Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Genetics

Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments

Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments is a research topic within Genetics. Science Explorer counts 23k research works in it since 1950. 8.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the genetics, development, and management of craniofacial abnormalities such as craniosynostosis, Treacher Collins syndrome, and positional plagiocephaly. It explores topics such as neural crest cell formation, FGF signaling, skull vault growth, genetic mutations associated with craniofacial disorders, suture development, and the use of distraction osteogenesis for treatment.

  • Craniosynostosis
  • Neural Crest
  • FGF Signaling
  • Skull Vault Growth
  • Genetic Mutations
  • Osteogenesis
  • Positional Plagiocephaly
  • Treacher Collins Syndrome
  • Suture Development
  • Distraction Osteogenesis
Research works
23k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
8.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+26%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (903 and 343 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 903 works
  2. 2 China 343 works
  3. 3 India 330 works
  4. 4 Brazil 227 works
  5. 5 Japan 148 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 129 works
  7. 7 Germany 118 works
  8. 8 Türkiye 107 works
  9. 9 Italy 104 works
  10. 10 France 89 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 36.2%China: 13.8%India: 13.2%Brazil: 9.1%6 others listed: 27.8%36%largest
United States903 · 36.2%China343 · 13.8%India330 · 13.2%Brazil227 · 9.1%6 others listed694 · 27.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia publishes the most Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments research, followed by Universidade de São Paulo and Services Institute of Medical Sciences.

Who are the leading researchers in Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments include Benjamin B. Massenburg and Steven A. Goldstein.

  1. 1 Benjamin B. Massenburg United States 2.7k citations
  2. 2 Steven A. Goldstein United States 2.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments research done?

The largest centres of Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), São Paulo (Brazil), Philadelphia (United States) and Los Angeles (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Mountain View, Rotterdam and Lahore.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 82 works
  2. 2 São Paulo Brazil 59 works
  3. 3 Philadelphia United States 53 works
  4. 4 Los Angeles United States 50 works
  5. 5 New York United States 44 works
  6. 6 London United Kingdom 42 works
  7. 7 Seoul South Korea 42 works
  8. 8 Tokyo Japan 40 works
  9. 9 Lahore Pakistan 40 works
  10. 10 Shanghai China 39 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Mountain ViewUS · 21.8 works11×
  2. RotterdamNL · 24.8 works11×
  3. LahorePK · 39.7 works6.2×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments than the world average.

See Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments on the map

Where is the best place to study Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Southern California, University College London and Capital Medical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 12.68%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Southern California: 14, 18.0%University College London: 11, 18.9%Capital Medical University: 9, 18.9%Yale University: 16, 13.9%Services Institute of Medical Sciences: 22, 0.7%Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: 17, 9.7%Harvard University: 11, 15.1%University of Pennsylvania: 12, 10.4%Sichuan University: 21, 8.4%Washington University in St. Louis: 9, 12.8%University College L…Capital Medical Univ…University of Southe…Yale University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of Southern CaliforniaUnited States 55.218.0%5.5×14 +5.7%
2 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 54.418.9%2.3×11 +62.5%
3 Capital Medical UniversityChina 53.218.9%4.4×9 +63.5%
4 Yale UniversityUnited States 53.113.9%4.5×16 +48.3%
5 Services Institute of Medical SciencesPakistan 51.40.7%361.5×22
6 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 48.59.7%4.9×17 +58.4%
7 Harvard UniversityUnited States 43.515.1%2.6×11 +20.6%
8 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 40.910.4%3.6×12 +51.5%
9 Sichuan UniversityChina 40.48.4%3.5×21 +17.1%
10 Washington University in St. LouisUnited States 39.412.8%3.5×9 +47.6%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 26% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.