Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Facility Location and Emergency Management

Facility Location and Emergency Management is a research topic within Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Science Explorer counts 11k research works in it since 1950. 30.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on humanitarian logistics and disaster relief operations management, covering topics such as supply chain management, facility location, emergency logistics planning, optimization models, stochastic programming, reliability models, coordination in relief chains, and healthcare facility location. The research aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of logistics and operations in responding to natural disasters and humanitarian crises.

  • Humanitarian Logistics
  • Disaster Relief
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Facility Location
  • Emergency Logistics Planning
  • Optimization Models
  • Stochastic Programming
  • Reliability Models
  • Coordination
  • Healthcare Facility Location
Research works
11k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
3.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
30.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+38%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Facility Location and Emergency Management research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (646 and 289 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 646 works
  2. 2 United States 289 works
  3. 3 Iran 122 works
  4. 4 Türkiye 121 works
  5. 5 India 120 works
  6. 6 Indonesia 76 works
  7. 7 United Kingdom 67 works
  8. 8 Canada 62 works
  9. 9 Germany 55 works
  10. 10 France 51 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 40.1%United States: 18.0%Iran: 7.6%Türkiye: 7.5%6 others listed: 26.8%40%largest
China646 · 40.1%United States289 · 18.0%Iran122 · 7.6%Türkiye121 · 7.5%6 others listed431 · 26.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Facility Location and Emergency Management research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Sichuan University publishes the most Facility Location and Emergency Management research, followed by University of Tehran and Beijing Jiaotong University.

Who are the leading researchers in Facility Location and Emergency Management?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Facility Location and Emergency Management include Gilbert Laporte.

  1. 1 Gilbert Laporte Canada 2.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Facility Location and Emergency Management research done?

The largest centres of Facility Location and Emergency Management research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tehran (Iran), Shanghai (China) and Chengdu (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Tehran and Istanbul.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 121 works
  2. 2 Tehran Iran 66 works
  3. 3 Shanghai China 60 works
  4. 4 Chengdu China 43 works
  5. 5 Nanjing China 42 works
  6. 6 Istanbul Türkiye 38 works
  7. 7 Wuhan China 34 works
  8. 8 Xi'an China 32 works
  9. 9 Changsha China 22 works
  10. 10 Chongqing China 20 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. TehranIR · 65.7 works5.2×
  2. IstanbulTR · 38.3 works3.5×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Facility Location and Emergency Management than the world average.

See Facility Location and Emergency Management on the map

Where is the best place to study Facility Location and Emergency Management?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Tehran, Beijing Jiaotong University and Hong Kong Polytechnic University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 31.48%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Tehran: 18, 52.3%Beijing Jiaotong University: 16, 31.1%Hong Kong Polytechnic University: 10, 55.9%Sichuan University: 19, 40.0%Iran University of Science and Technology: 8, 33.4%University of Žilina: 8, 6.5%Indian Institute of Technology Delhi: 8, 11.6%Shanghai University: 9, 19.1%Southwest Jiaotong University: 10, 30.2%Wuhan University of Technology: 10, 34.7%Hong Kong Polytechni…University of TehranSichuan UniversityBeijing Jiaotong Uni…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of TehranIran 86.652.3%13.5×18 +141.4%
2 Beijing Jiaotong UniversityChina 61.031.1%11.5×16 +18.7%
3 Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong 56.055.9%5.0×10 +0.9%
4 Sichuan UniversityChina 53.740.0%4.9×19 +51.5%
5 Iran University of Science and TechnologyIran 48.233.4%12.6×8 +42.2%
6 University of ŽilinaSlovakia 43.46.5%31.4×8 +378.0%
7 Indian Institute of Technology DelhiIndia 32.711.6%6.8×8 +301.5%
8 Shanghai UniversityChina 32.119.1%5.2×9 +179.6%
9 Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChina 30.830.2%5.8×10 -81.7%
10 Wuhan University of TechnologyChina 30.634.7%5.0×10 -21.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Facility Location and Emergency Management research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 38% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Facility Location and Emergency Management.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.