Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning is a research topic within Artificial Intelligence. Science Explorer counts 21k research works in it since 1950. 20.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the effectiveness and impact of intelligent tutoring systems, exploring topics such as cognitive-affective interaction, meta-cognitive skills, knowledge tracing, student modeling, and adaptive learning environments. It also delves into the use of educational agents, Bayesian networks, and pedagogical strategies to enhance learning outcomes.

  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems
  • Affective States
  • Cognitive-Affective Interaction
  • Meta-cognitive Skills
  • Knowledge Tracing
  • Student Modeling
  • Adaptive Learning Environments
  • Educational Agents
  • Bayesian Networks
  • Pedagogical Strategies
Research works
21k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4.2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
20.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+13%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (993 and 872 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 993 works
  2. 2 China 872 works
  3. 3 India 514 works
  4. 4 Indonesia 213 works
  5. 5 Germany 201 works
  6. 6 Japan 153 works
  7. 7 United Kingdom 145 works
  8. 8 Canada 124 works
  9. 9 Australia 109 works
  10. 10 Türkiye 98 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 29.0%China: 25.5%India: 15.0%Indonesia: 6.2%6 others listed: 24.2%29%largest
United States993 · 29.0%China872 · 25.5%India514 · 15.0%Indonesia213 · 6.2%6 others listed829 · 24.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Central China Normal University publishes the most Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning research, followed by Carnegie Mellon University and East China Normal University.

Who are the leading researchers in Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning include Richard E. Mayer, Robert J. Sternberg and Richard G. Baraniuk.

  1. 1 Richard E. Mayer United States 4.7k citations
  2. 2 Robert J. Sternberg United States 4.4k citations
  3. 3 Richard G. Baraniuk United States 4.4k citations
  4. 4 Herbert A. Simon United States 4.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning research done?

The largest centres of Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Wuhan (China), Shanghai (China) and Guangzhou (China).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 138 works
  2. 2 Wuhan China 76 works
  3. 3 Shanghai China 66 works
  4. 4 Guangzhou China 66 works
  5. 5 Chennai India 56 works
  6. 6 Tokyo Japan 48 works
  7. 7 Pittsburgh United States 42 works
  8. 8 Bengaluru India 39 works
  9. 9 Singapore Singapore 39 works
  10. 10 London United Kingdom 38 works
See Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning on the map

Where is the best place to study Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning?

Among universities, judged by research, Central China Normal University, Education University of Hong Kong and Carnegie Mellon University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%50%100%mean 39.18%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Central China Normal University: 47, 26.9%Education University of Hong Kong: 12, 60.3%Carnegie Mellon University: 33, 41.4%East China Normal University: 24, 34.0%Abdelmalek Essaâdi University: 15, 15.2%University of West Attica: 9, 52.3%Beijing Normal University: 23, 24.9%Monash University: 9, 74.4%Macao Polytechnic University: 9, 21.9%University of Florida: 16, 40.5%Education University…Carnegie Mellon Univ…East China Normal Un…Central China Normal…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Central China Normal UniversityChina 72.526.9%35.4×47 +325.2%
2 Education University of Hong KongHong Kong 71.860.3%15.8×12 +143.4%
3 Carnegie Mellon UniversityUnited States 63.841.4%15.6×33 +1.5%
4 East China Normal UniversityChina 56.934.0%9.2×24
5 Abdelmalek Essaâdi UniversityMorocco 55.315.2%17.1×15 +449.1%
6 University of West AtticaGreece 55.352.3%12.2×9
7 Beijing Normal UniversityChina 53.624.9%6.3×23 +222.0%
8 Monash UniversityAustralia 50.474.4%2.1×9 +111.6%
9 Macao Polytechnic UniversityMacau 48.421.9%20.5×9
10 University of FloridaUnited States 45.940.5%2.9×16 +193.0%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 13% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.