Australia vs Iceland
On research quality in 2022-now, Australia ranks #7 in the world and Iceland #50, of 189 countries. Australia stands higher in 26 of the 26 fields both publish in, Iceland in 0.
Research profiles alike: 0.64similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Australia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #7
- #8 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 343k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 15.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 40%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Research and Theory, Public Administration, Medical Terminology.
Iceland
- World rank, 2022-now
- #50
- #42 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 5.2k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 10.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 46%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Chemical Health and Safety, Classics, Geophysics.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Australia leads on 6 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate, citations per work and institutions in the world top 100. Iceland leads on 3 of 9 measures: open access, international co-authorship and growth.
- #7Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#50
- 1.29×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.95×
- 343kOutputfractional works, 2022-now5.2k
- 15.0%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited10.0%
- 28.5Citations per workall time, per fractional work25.7
- 5World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 40%Open accessof its works free to read, all time46%
- 26%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time42%
- -3%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+11%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Australia stands higher in 26 of 26 fields, Iceland in 0. Australia leads most in Computer Science (#6 against #69). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #6Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- #9Arts and Humanities#40
- #8Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#37
- #8Business, Management and Accounting-
- #5Chemical Engineering-
- #12Chemistry-
- #6Computer Science#69
- #7Decision Sciences-
- #8Dentistry-
- #6Earth and Planetary Sciences#34
- #8Economics, Econometrics and Finance-
- #6Energy-
- #5Engineering#54
- #4Environmental Science#49
- #5Health Professions-
- #7Immunology and Microbiology-
- #6Materials Science-
- #12Mathematics-
- #9Medicine#40
- #9Neuroscience-
- #7Nursing-
- #9Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #12Physics and Astronomy-
- #5Psychology#41
- #7Social Sciences#55
- #6Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Australia rank | Iceland rank | Australia top 10% | Iceland top 10% | Australia works | Iceland works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #6 | - | 15.4% | - | 12k | - |
| Arts and Humanities | #9 | #40 | 14.3% | 12.6% | 9.7k | 249 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #8 | #37 | 13.0% | 12.4% | 16k | 228 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #8 | - | 16.3% | - | 9.8k | - |
| Chemical Engineering | #5 | - | 15.5% | - | 779 | - |
| Chemistry | #12 | - | 12.8% | - | 2.8k | - |
| Computer Science | #6 | #69 | 16.7% | 5.8% | 20k | 255 |
| Decision Sciences | #7 | - | 15.0% | - | 3.7k | - |
| Dentistry | #8 | - | 18.7% | - | 1.1k | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #6 | #34 | 14.0% | 11.0% | 6.3k | 221 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #8 | - | 12.4% | - | 8.1k | - |
| Energy | #6 | - | 17.0% | - | 2.7k | - |
| Engineering | #5 | #54 | 16.2% | 11.3% | 37k | 443 |
| Environmental Science | #4 | #49 | 14.3% | 9.1% | 21k | 428 |
| Health Professions | #5 | - | 15.4% | - | 16k | - |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #7 | - | 13.3% | - | 3.6k | - |
| Materials Science | #6 | - | 15.8% | - | 6.8k | - |
| Mathematics | #12 | - | 13.5% | - | 2.5k | - |
| Medicine | #9 | #40 | 14.0% | 11.3% | 80k | 971 |
| Neuroscience | #9 | - | 12.8% | - | 7.1k | - |
| Nursing | #7 | - | 15.7% | - | 1.9k | - |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #9 | - | 14.2% | - | 814 | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #12 | - | 12.5% | - | 5.8k | - |
| Psychology | #5 | #41 | 16.5% | 9.0% | 18k | 304 |
| Social Sciences | #7 | #55 | 16.0% | 9.1% | 47k | 831 |
| Veterinary | #6 | - | 14.8% | - | 738 | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Australia
- Decolonization
- Population Dynamics
- Health Equity
- Adolescents
- Primary Care
- Physical Activity
- Anxiety
- Prevalence
- Social Support
- Biodiversity
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Social Media
- Oxidative Stress
- Depression
- Environmental Impact
- Quality of Life
- Public Health
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Mental Health
- Globalization
- Inflammation
- Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Treatment
- Healthcare
- Resilience
- Genetics
- Identity
- Mortality
- Global Burden
- Aging
- Ethics
- Ethical Considerations
- Neoliberalism
- Vulnerability
- Health Disparities
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology21k▲ 1.37×140 topics
- Climate Change15k▲ 1.45×132 topics
- Machine Learning11k▼ 0.86×97 topics
- Deep Learning11k▼ 0.79×85 topics
- Mental Health9,669▲ 1.74×48 topics
- Sustainability9,393◆ 0.99×140 topics
- Globalization9,017▲ 1.18×185 topics
- Public Health8,739▲ 1.54×77 topics
- Inflammation8,511◆ 1.03×83 topics
- Quality of Life8,357▲ 1.49×61 topics
- Risk Factors6,421▲ 1.50×37 topics
- Environmental Impact6,048◆ 0.91×74 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease5,888▲ 1.33×39 topics
- Depression5,660▲ 1.65×26 topics
- Treatment5,636▲ 1.19×52 topics
- Oxidative Stress5,147▼ 0.80×63 topics
- Healthcare5,064◆ 1.14×44 topics
- Social Media4,900◆ 0.91×41 topics
- Resilience4,114▲ 2.1×19 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome4,006▲ 1.27×24 topics
- Genetics3,863▲ 1.40×27 topics
- Biodiversity3,847▲ 1.30×38 topics
- Identity3,769▲ 1.34×79 topics
- Social Support3,667▲ 1.75×20 topics
- Mortality3,644▲ 1.65×13 topics
- Prevalence3,622▲ 2.3×15 topics
- Global Burden3,532▲ 1.66×12 topics
- Anxiety3,449▲ 1.86×12 topics
- Aging3,396▲ 1.60×19 topics
- Physical Activity3,364▲ 1.78×13 topics
- Ethics3,337▲ 1.69×62 topics
- Primary Care3,139▲ 2.2×15 topics
- Ethical Considerations3,109▲ 2.3×21 topics
- Adolescents3,045▲ 2.1×11 topics
- Neoliberalism2,940▲ 2.1×30 topics
- Health Equity2,880▲ 2.5×6 topics
- Vulnerability2,625▲ 2.9×9 topics
- Population Dynamics2,566▲ 2.6×13 topics
- Health Disparities2,466▲ 2.4×9 topics
- Decolonization1,706▲ 5.4×8 topics
Iceland
- Northern Sea Route
- Oil and Gas
- Iceland
- Shipping
- Holocene
- Medieval
- Hydrology
- Aquaculture
- Labor Market
- Arctic
- Religion
- Resilience
- Literature
- Depression
- Treatment
- Quality of Life
- Environmental Impact
- Inflammation
- Globalization
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Mental Health
- Remote Sensing
- Public Health
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Risk Factors
- Biodiversity
- Meta-Analysis
- Invasive Species
- Prevalence
- Fisheries Sustainability
- Governance
- International Relations
- Plate Tectonics
- Financial Crisis
- Freshwater Biodiversity
- Banking Sector
- Socioeconomic Inequality
- Maritime Transport
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change398▲ 2.5×100 topics
- Epidemiology292▲ 1.23×130 topics
- Sustainability196▲ 1.35×88 topics
- Globalization185▲ 1.58×95 topics
- Mental Health156▲ 1.83×41 topics
- Inflammation143◆ 1.13×76 topics
- Remote Sensing110▲ 1.52×31 topics
- Environmental Impact109◆ 1.08×52 topics
- Public Health104▲ 1.20×59 topics
- Quality of Life97◆ 1.13×52 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease96▲ 1.41×37 topics
- Treatment93▲ 1.29×49 topics
- Risk Factors87▲ 1.33×36 topics
- Depression87▲ 1.66×22 topics
- Biodiversity78▲ 1.72×34 topics
- Literature72▲ 2.2×37 topics
- Meta-Analysis67▲ 1.92×18 topics
- Resilience67▲ 2.3×17 topics
- Invasive Species66▲ 2.6×20 topics
- Religion64▲ 2.3×29 topics
- Prevalence63▲ 2.6×14 topics
- Arctic62▲ 9.4×4 topics
- Fisheries Sustainability60▲ 12×2 topics
- Labor Market58▲ 3.5×14 topics
- Governance56▲ 2.9×16 topics
- Aquaculture51▲ 3.4×8 topics
- International Relations49▲ 3.4×17 topics
- Hydrology45▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Plate Tectonics44▲ 4.9×3 topics
- Medieval43▲ 21×3 topics
- Financial Crisis41▲ 6.2×12 topics
- Holocene40▲ 6.0×3 topics
- Freshwater Biodiversity36▲ 9.9×2 topics
- Shipping35▲ 12×2 topics
- Banking Sector34▲ 43×3 topics
- Iceland34▲ 138×1 topic
- Socioeconomic Inequality34▲ 69×1 topic
- Oil and Gas33▲ 16×2 topics
- Maritime Transport33▲ 21×1 topic
- Northern Sea Route33▲ 21×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Australia has out-published Iceland every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 3In the world top 500
- 5In the top 1000
- 19In the top 5000
- 35In the top 1,0001
- #6Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#42
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Australia or Iceland?
Australia publishes 66.3× as much research as Iceland in 2022-now (343k against 5.2k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Australia or Iceland?
15.0% of Australia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 10.0% for Iceland.
Is Australia or Iceland growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +11% against 2018-21 for Iceland, and -3% for Australia.
Which has more open access research, Australia or Iceland?
46% of Iceland's research is free to read, against 40% of Australia's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Australia or Iceland?
Australia holds 5 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Iceland 0; in the top 1,000 it is 35 against 1.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Australia
- 1The University of Melbourne14.9% top 10% · 23k works
- 2UNSW Sydney15.7% top 10% · 19k works
- 3Monash University16.1% top 10% · 20k works
- 4The University of Queensland15.0% top 10% · 20k works
- 5The University of Sydney14.4% top 10% · 25k works
- 6Australian National University13.7% top 10% · 11k works
Iceland
- 1University of Iceland10.7% top 10% · 2.7k works
- 2Reykjavík University13.8% top 10% · 690 works
- 3Directorate of Health4.1% top 10% · 610 works
- 4University of Akureyri7.6% top 10% · 236 works
- 5Matís (Iceland)3.4% top 10% · 84 works
- 6Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies8.9% top 10% · 70 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Australia
- 1 Seyedali Mirjalili #9 worldwide 154k citations · 823 works
- 2 Weng Marc Lim #78 worldwide 42k citations · 417 works
- 3 Shulei Chou #90 worldwide 63k citations · 657 works
- 4 Shi‐Zhang Qiao #130 worldwide 159k citations · 811 works
- 5 X. J. Zhu #134 worldwide 95k citations · 301 works
Iceland
- 1 Unnur Arna Thorsteinsdottir #13 worldwide 144k citations · 597 works
- 2 Kāri Stefánsson #43 worldwide 211k citations · 1,140 works
- 3 Augustine Kong #84 worldwide 97k citations · 293 works
- 4 Guðmar Þorleifsson #122 worldwide 120k citations · 579 works
- 5 Daniel Fannar Gudbjartsson #133 worldwide 88k citations · 524 works
Other comparisons
Australiavs
United Kingdom
Australiavs
France
Australiavs
Switzerland
Australiavs
Canada
Australiavs
Netherlands
Australiavs
Spain