Brazil vs Uruguay
On research quality in 2022-now, Brazil ranks #28 in the world and Uruguay #80, of 189 countries. Brazil stands higher in 26 of the 26 fields both publish in, Uruguay in 0.
Research profiles alike: 0.79very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Brazil
- World rank, 2022-now
- #28
- #23 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 703k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 69%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Forestry, General Arts and Humanities, Information Systems and Management.
Uruguay
- World rank, 2022-now
- #80
- #73 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 10k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 5.7%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 58%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Life-span and Life-course Studies, Paleontology, General Social Sciences.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Brazil leads on 4 of 9 measures: research quality, output, top-10% rate and open access. Uruguay leads on 4 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #28Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#80
- 0.67×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.70×
- 703kOutputfractional works, 2022-now10k
- 6.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited5.7%
- 9.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work9.6
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 69%Open accessof its works free to read, all time58%
- 14%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time36%
- -8%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+6%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Brazil stands higher in 26 of 26 fields, Uruguay in 0. Brazil leads most in Business, Management and Accounting (#24 against #87). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #24Agricultural and Biological Sciences#83
- #21Arts and Humanities#60
- #33Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#54
- #24Business, Management and Accounting#87
- #30Chemical Engineering-
- #33Chemistry-
- #28Computer Science#100
- #22Decision Sciences-
- #22Dentistry-
- #29Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #30Economics, Econometrics and Finance#77
- #34Energy-
- #33Engineering#102
- #21Environmental Science#88
- #20Health Professions#60
- #29Immunology and Microbiology-
- #35Materials Science-
- #31Mathematics-
- #25Medicine#65
- #33Neuroscience-
- #16Nursing-
- #26Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #26Physics and Astronomy-
- #26Psychology#68
- #18Social Sciences#67
- #18Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Brazil rank | Uruguay rank | Brazil top 10% | Uruguay top 10% | Brazil works | Uruguay works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #24 | #83 | 5.7% | 6.1% | 53k | 914 |
| Arts and Humanities | #21 | #60 | 8.0% | 8.3% | 40k | 354 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #33 | #54 | 5.1% | 5.2% | 23k | 624 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #24 | #87 | 4.5% | 5.5% | 14k | 229 |
| Chemical Engineering | #30 | - | 5.4% | - | 1k | - |
| Chemistry | #33 | - | 5.7% | - | 5.8k | - |
| Computer Science | #28 | #100 | 6.4% | 5.0% | 31k | 500 |
| Decision Sciences | #22 | - | 8.7% | - | 16k | - |
| Dentistry | #22 | - | 5.8% | - | 8.7k | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #29 | - | 5.9% | - | 6.2k | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #30 | #77 | 4.8% | 7.3% | 8.9k | 240 |
| Energy | #34 | - | 4.7% | - | 2.6k | - |
| Engineering | #33 | #102 | 4.7% | 4.2% | 46k | 448 |
| Environmental Science | #21 | #88 | 6.9% | 5.2% | 55k | 686 |
| Health Professions | #20 | #60 | 7.0% | 4.9% | 38k | 460 |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #29 | - | 5.2% | - | 6.1k | - |
| Materials Science | #35 | - | 4.5% | - | 10k | - |
| Mathematics | #31 | - | 5.5% | - | 4.8k | - |
| Medicine | #25 | #65 | 4.8% | 4.1% | 113k | 2.2k |
| Neuroscience | #33 | - | 4.6% | - | 6.4k | - |
| Nursing | #16 | - | 5.3% | - | 3.8k | - |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #26 | - | 6.1% | - | 1.6k | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #26 | - | 4.8% | - | 7k | - |
| Psychology | #26 | #68 | 5.5% | 4.8% | 22k | 333 |
| Social Sciences | #18 | #67 | 8.2% | 7.6% | 177k | 2.2k |
| Veterinary | #18 | - | 4.8% | - | 1.9k | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Brazil
- Organizational Management
- Human Resources Management
- Quantitative Research
- Innovation Management
- Discourse Analysis
- Environmental Education
- Anthropology
- Critical Pedagogy
- Educational Policies
- Distance Learning
- Social Determinants
- Brazil
- Biodiversity
- Healthcare
- Online Learning
- Educational Technology
- Quality of Life
- Globalization
- Public Policy
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Teacher Training
- Qualitative Research
- Public Health
- Education
- Social Inequality
- Curriculum Development
- Healthcare Access
- Cultural Identity
- Social Movements
- Inclusive Education
- Pedagogical Practices
- Educational Reform
- Health Policy
- Agroecology
- Data Analysis
- Research Methods
- Marketing Strategies
- Case Study
- Competence Management
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology44k▲ 1.41×140 topics
- Sustainability41k▲ 2.2×139 topics
- Teacher Training41k▲ 8.6×30 topics
- Public Policy40k▲ 11×34 topics
- Qualitative Research39k▲ 5.9×46 topics
- Globalization36k▲ 2.4×185 topics
- Public Health35k▲ 3.1×77 topics
- Quality of Life30k▲ 2.7×61 topics
- Education30k▲ 2.3×160 topics
- Educational Technology30k▲ 3.2×48 topics
- Social Inequality24k▲ 12×21 topics
- Online Learning24k▲ 3.7×27 topics
- Curriculum Development23k▲ 4.4×20 topics
- Healthcare23k▲ 2.6×44 topics
- Healthcare Access20k▲ 9.4×13 topics
- Biodiversity20k▲ 3.3×38 topics
- Cultural Identity19k▲ 4.8×40 topics
- Brazil18k▲ 26×5 topics
- Social Movements18k▲ 7.6×33 topics
- Social Determinants16k▲ 10×8 topics
- Inclusive Education16k▲ 5.8×20 topics
- Distance Learning16k▲ 5.8×14 topics
- Pedagogical Practices15k▲ 22×3 topics
- Educational Policies15k▲ 18×3 topics
- Educational Reform15k▲ 16×9 topics
- Critical Pedagogy15k▲ 22×4 topics
- Health Policy14k▲ 12×7 topics
- Anthropology13k▲ 18×11 topics
- Agroecology13k▲ 12×6 topics
- Environmental Education13k▲ 11×11 topics
- Data Analysis13k▲ 6.4×14 topics
- Discourse Analysis13k▲ 6.8×12 topics
- Research Methods13k▲ 10×9 topics
- Innovation Management13k▲ 10×10 topics
- Marketing Strategies13k▲ 17×3 topics
- Quantitative Research12k▲ 13×5 topics
- Case Study12k▲ 25×2 topics
- Human Resources Management12k▲ 25×2 topics
- Competence Management12k▲ 27×1 topic
- Organizational Management12k▲ 27×1 topic
Uruguay
- Aging Population
- Legal Philosophy
- Research
- Welfare State
- Chronic Diseases
- Inclusive Education
- Health Policy
- Invasive Species
- Social Determinants
- Teacher Training
- Healthcare Access
- Qualitative Research
- Healthcare
- Innovation
- Mental Health
- Biodiversity
- Latin America
- Sustainability
- Public Health
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Education
- Quality of Life
- Educational Technology
- Human Rights
- Oxidative Stress
- Sustainable Development
- Public Policy
- Treatment
- Knowledge Management
- Social Movements
- Social Inequality
- Drug Resistance
- Communication
- Evolution
- Inequality
- Constitutional Law
- Legal Theory
- Dairy Cattle
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology790▲ 1.68×137 topics
- Climate Change549▲ 1.71×107 topics
- Globalization529▲ 2.3×120 topics
- Public Health505▲ 2.9×68 topics
- Education416▲ 2.0×104 topics
- Sustainability402▲ 1.39×101 topics
- Quality of Life357▲ 2.1×58 topics
- Latin America301▲ 13×23 topics
- Educational Technology292▲ 2.1×37 topics
- Biodiversity287▲ 3.2×33 topics
- Human Rights286▲ 2.4×58 topics
- Mental Health259▲ 1.53×47 topics
- Oxidative Stress258▲ 1.32×60 topics
- Innovation246▲ 2.0×56 topics
- Sustainable Development245▲ 1.32×66 topics
- Healthcare238▲ 1.76×29 topics
- Public Policy231▲ 4.1×23 topics
- Qualitative Research220▲ 2.2×31 topics
- Treatment218▲ 1.52×51 topics
- Healthcare Access205▲ 6.4×12 topics
- Knowledge Management196▲ 3.0×29 topics
- Teacher Training196▲ 2.7×23 topics
- Social Movements192▲ 5.5×29 topics
- Social Determinants181▲ 7.4×8 topics
- Social Inequality169▲ 5.3×16 topics
- Invasive Species160▲ 3.2×20 topics
- Drug Resistance157▲ 4.6×9 topics
- Health Policy156▲ 8.6×7 topics
- Communication144▲ 3.9×23 topics
- Inclusive Education138▲ 3.2×18 topics
- Evolution135▲ 4.2×17 topics
- Chronic Diseases127▲ 4.2×9 topics
- Inequality117▲ 4.3×15 topics
- Welfare State106▲ 11×4 topics
- Constitutional Law102▲ 6.6×7 topics
- Research99▲ 6.7×10 topics
- Legal Theory98▲ 12×3 topics
- Legal Philosophy96▲ 13×2 topics
- Dairy Cattle95▲ 15×2 topics
- Aging Population95▲ 9.1×4 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Brazil has out-published Uruguay every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 1In the top 5000
- 5In the top 1,0000
- #30Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Brazil or Uruguay?
Brazil publishes 68.5× as much research as Uruguay in 2022-now (703k against 10k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Brazil or Uruguay?
6.4% of Brazil's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 5.7% for Uruguay.
Is Brazil or Uruguay growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +6% against 2018-21 for Uruguay, and -8% for Brazil.
Which has more open access research, Brazil or Uruguay?
69% of Brazil's research is free to read, against 58% of Uruguay's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Brazil or Uruguay?
Brazil holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Uruguay 0; in the top 1,000 it is 5 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Brazil
- 1Universidade de São Paulo7.3% top 10% · 42k works
- 2Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)8.0% top 10% · 16k works
- 3Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro7.0% top 10% · 16k works
- 4Universidade Federal de Pernambuco6.1% top 10% · 10k works
- 5Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina7.1% top 10% · 14k works
- 6Universidade Federal de São Carlos7.3% top 10% · 8k works
Uruguay
- 1Universidad de la República de Uruguay5.3% top 10% · 5.3k works
- 2Universitario Francisco de Asís4.0% top 10% · 1.6k works
- 3Universidad de Montevideo5.6% top 10% · 567 works
- 4Universidad Católica del Uruguay9.4% top 10% · 277 works
- 5Universidad ORT Uruguay10.3% top 10% · 276 works
- 6Ministerio de Educación y Cultura9.5% top 10% · 195 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Brazil
- 1 Cesar Augusto Costa #1,403 worldwide 92k citations · 285 works
- 2 M. Constancio #1,669 worldwide 67k citations · 138 works
- 3 Amanda Lange Sálvia #2,241 worldwide 7.4k citations · 432 works
- 4 E. C. Ferreira #3,093 worldwide 73k citations · 138 works
- 5 Marcos Roberto Tovani‐Palone #5,134 worldwide 120k citations · 231 works
Uruguay
- 1 Rafael Radí #57,480 worldwide 48k citations · 529 works
- 2 Valentina Colistro #96,125 worldwide 24k citations · 76 works
- 3 Gustavo J. Nagy #150,922 worldwide 3.4k citations · 101 works
- 4 José Luis Badano #151,123 worldwide 8.5k citations · 73 works
- 5 Gastón Ares #170,491 worldwide 24k citations · 521 works
Other comparisons
Brazilvs
New Zealand
Brazilvs
Czechia
Brazilvs
Portugal
Brazilvs
South Africa
Brazilvs
Ireland
Brazilvs
Saudi Arabia