Lithuania vs Poland
On research quality in 2022-now, Poland ranks #23 in the world and Lithuania #73, of 189 countries. Lithuania stands higher in 0 of the 26 fields both publish in, Poland in 26.
Research profiles alike: 0.51similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Lithuania
- World rank, 2022-now
- #73
- #71 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 8.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 65%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Language and Linguistics, Algebra and Number Theory.
Poland
- World rank, 2022-now
- #23
- #28 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 250k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 9.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 49%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Linguistics and Language, General Social Sciences, History.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Poland leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and citations per work. Lithuania leads on 3 of 9 measures: open access, international co-authorship and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #73Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#23
- 0.71×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.93×
- 20kOutputfractional works, 2022-now250k
- 8.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited9.2%
- 8.7Citations per workall time, per fractional work9.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 65%Open accessof its works free to read, all time49%
- 18%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time13%
- +6%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-11%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Lithuania stands higher in 0 of 26 fields, Poland in 26. Poland leads most in Chemistry (#17 against #64). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #63Agricultural and Biological Sciences#21
- #63Arts and Humanities#19
- #47Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#25
- #62Business, Management and Accounting#25
- -Chemical Engineering#25
- #64Chemistry#17
- #65Computer Science#23
- #59Decision Sciences#30
- -Dentistry#18
- #71Earth and Planetary Sciences#35
- #64Economics, Econometrics and Finance#21
- -Energy#22
- #62Engineering#25
- #70Environmental Science#28
- #63Health Professions#28
- -Immunology and Microbiology#30
- #56Materials Science#17
- #72Mathematics#24
- #83Medicine#29
- #50Neuroscience#29
- -Nursing#21
- -Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#18
- #60Physics and Astronomy#23
- #55Psychology#30
- #77Social Sciences#24
- -Veterinary#16
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Lithuania rank | Poland rank | Lithuania top 10% | Poland top 10% | Lithuania works | Poland works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #63 | #21 | 12.2% | 11.8% | 1.1k | 12k |
| Arts and Humanities | #63 | #19 | 8.7% | 9.8% | 1.2k | 17k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #47 | #25 | 8.2% | 9.3% | 796 | 12k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #62 | #25 | 10.4% | 8.7% | 996 | 7.4k |
| Chemical Engineering | - | #25 | - | 7.2% | - | 905 |
| Chemistry | #64 | #17 | 8.9% | 9.0% | 222 | 4.5k |
| Computer Science | #65 | #23 | 9.0% | 8.1% | 1.1k | 11k |
| Decision Sciences | #59 | #30 | 11.8% | 8.1% | 207 | 1.7k |
| Dentistry | - | #18 | - | 20.1% | - | 965 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #71 | #35 | 5.6% | 7.1% | 240 | 3.3k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #64 | #21 | 10.1% | 8.5% | 683 | 6.7k |
| Energy | - | #22 | - | 10.1% | - | 2.1k |
| Engineering | #62 | #25 | 7.2% | 8.3% | 2.7k | 32k |
| Environmental Science | #70 | #28 | 8.6% | 9.0% | 1.1k | 12k |
| Health Professions | #63 | #28 | 8.3% | 10.4% | 479 | 3.7k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #30 | - | 9.9% | - | 2.1k |
| Materials Science | #56 | #17 | 6.5% | 7.2% | 622 | 8.7k |
| Mathematics | #72 | #24 | 5.7% | 8.1% | 250 | 2.9k |
| Medicine | #83 | #29 | 7.3% | 10.5% | 2.9k | 40k |
| Neuroscience | #50 | #29 | 7.9% | 8.9% | 255 | 3.4k |
| Nursing | - | #21 | - | 12.0% | - | 1.3k |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | - | #18 | - | 12.5% | - | 779 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #60 | #23 | 6.3% | 7.3% | 359 | 5.6k |
| Psychology | #55 | #30 | 8.6% | 8.2% | 850 | 7k |
| Social Sciences | #77 | #24 | 8.0% | 8.7% | 3.6k | 50k |
| Veterinary | - | #16 | - | 10.4% | - | 359 |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Lithuania
- National Stereotypes
- Social Perception
- Australia
- Cold War
- Eastern Europe
- Social Competence
- Soviet Union
- Entrepreneurship
- Ethics
- International Relations
- Identity
- Economic Growth
- Energy Efficiency
- Higher Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Climate Change
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Environmental Impact
- Renewable Energy
- Mental Health
- Pedagogy
- Leadership
- Environmental Management
- European Union
- Literature
- Learning
- Professional Identity
- Digital Competence
- Feminist Research
- European Integration
- Diplomacy
- Postcolonial Theory
- Rhetoric
- Imagology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability824▲ 1.45×121 topics
- Climate Change727◆ 1.15×118 topics
- Epidemiology724▼ 0.78×135 topics
- Education679▲ 1.70×124 topics
- Globalization673▲ 1.47×156 topics
- Sustainable Development616▲ 1.70×98 topics
- Environmental Impact523▲ 1.32×70 topics
- Human Rights478▲ 2.0×81 topics
- Renewable Energy472▲ 1.40×55 topics
- Innovation454▲ 1.89×74 topics
- Mental Health415▲ 1.25×46 topics
- Artificial Intelligence405▲ 1.22×63 topics
- Pedagogy400▲ 3.4×30 topics
- Higher Education392▲ 3.2×32 topics
- Leadership360▲ 3.2×35 topics
- Energy Efficiency334▲ 1.56×43 topics
- Environmental Management326▲ 3.5×19 topics
- Economic Growth325▲ 1.72×34 topics
- European Union302▲ 5.8×27 topics
- Identity292▲ 1.73×72 topics
- Literature263▲ 2.1×51 topics
- International Relations262▲ 4.7×28 topics
- Learning248▲ 3.6×14 topics
- Ethics247▲ 2.1×50 topics
- Professional Identity240▲ 12×5 topics
- Entrepreneurship232▲ 2.5×22 topics
- Digital Competence226▲ 11×3 topics
- Soviet Union217▲ 17×3 topics
- Feminist Research215▲ 165×1 topic
- Social Competence215▲ 165×1 topic
- European Integration209▲ 16×6 topics
- Eastern Europe202▲ 17×3 topics
- Diplomacy177▲ 8.2×8 topics
- Cold War168▲ 12×5 topics
- Postcolonial Theory156▲ 26×4 topics
- Australia155▲ 42×1 topic
- Rhetoric151▲ 6.4×6 topics
- Social Perception142▲ 15×5 topics
- Imagology132▲ 57×1 topic
- National Stereotypes132▲ 57×1 topic
Poland
- Anthropology
- Historiography
- Social Change
- Digital Innovations
- European Union Law
- Ethnolinguistics
- Social Sciences
- Translation
- Multilingualism
- Language
- Sociolinguistics
- Ethics
- Polish history
- Cultural Identity
- Soviet Union
- Literature
- Ethnography
- Nationalism
- European Union
- Education
- Globalization
- Cultural Studies
- Human Rights
- Migration
- Innovation
- Eastern Europe
- Pedagogy
- Cultural Discourse
- Polish minority
- Cultural Heritage
- Culture
- Urban Development
- Lexicography
- Media Discourse
- Lifelong Learning
- Public Administration
- Youth Development
- National Identity
- Data Privacy
- Memory Studies
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization11k▲ 2.1×185 topics
- Education10k▲ 2.2×159 topics
- Cultural Studies7,244▲ 7.1×45 topics
- European Union7,132▲ 12×29 topics
- Human Rights6,479▲ 2.3×90 topics
- Nationalism6,245▲ 5.0×34 topics
- Migration6,012▲ 6.4×35 topics
- Ethnography5,863▲ 12×16 topics
- Innovation5,612▲ 1.97×90 topics
- Literature5,338▲ 3.5×64 topics
- Eastern Europe5,308▲ 37×3 topics
- Soviet Union5,301▲ 35×3 topics
- Pedagogy4,873▲ 3.5×30 topics
- Cultural Identity4,864▲ 3.5×40 topics
- Cultural Discourse4,864▲ 49×3 topics
- Polish history4,844▲ 71×1 topic
- Polish minority4,844▲ 71×1 topic
- Ethics4,813▲ 3.4×62 topics
- Cultural Heritage4,748▲ 3.2×40 topics
- Sociolinguistics4,605▲ 9.1×9 topics
- Culture4,528▲ 3.1×40 topics
- Language4,404▲ 6.4×15 topics
- Urban Development4,401▲ 4.5×23 topics
- Multilingualism4,107▲ 9.2×6 topics
- Lexicography4,106▲ 17×5 topics
- Translation4,103▲ 9.0×7 topics
- Media Discourse3,674▲ 21×4 topics
- Social Sciences3,670▲ 9.2×24 topics
- Lifelong Learning3,640▲ 6.4×11 topics
- Ethnolinguistics3,637▲ 44×2 topics
- Public Administration3,554▲ 16×6 topics
- European Union Law3,482▲ 79×2 topics
- Youth Development3,383▲ 13×9 topics
- Digital Innovations3,236▲ 81×1 topic
- National Identity3,110▲ 9.7×11 topics
- Social Change3,067▲ 9.0×21 topics
- Data Privacy2,893▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Historiography2,859▲ 8.5×15 topics
- Memory Studies2,850▲ 16×6 topics
- Anthropology2,767▲ 11×11 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Poland has out-published Lithuania every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5001
- 0In the top 1,0005
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#29
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Lithuania or Poland?
Poland publishes 12.3× as much research as Lithuania in 2022-now (250k against 20k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Lithuania or Poland?
9.2% of Poland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 8.4% for Lithuania.
Is Lithuania or Poland growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +6% against 2018-21 for Lithuania, and -11% for Poland.
Which has more open access research, Lithuania or Poland?
65% of Lithuania's research is free to read, against 49% of Poland's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Lithuania or Poland?
Lithuania holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Poland 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 5.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Lithuania
- 1Vytautas Magnus University9.8% top 10% · 1.7k works
- 2Vilnius University7.0% top 10% · 5.1k works
- 3Kaunas University of Technology11.3% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 4Vilnius Gediminas Technical University9.2% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 5Mykolas Romeris University8.3% top 10% · 635 works
- 6Klaipėda University7.7% top 10% · 550 works
Poland
- 1Polish Academy of Sciences9.4% top 10% · 21k works
- 2Jagiellonian University8.7% top 10% · 14k works
- 3University of Warsaw8.8% top 10% · 11k works
- 4AGH University of Krakow9.1% top 10% · 8k works
- 5University of Wrocław7.6% top 10% · 4.2k works
- 6Wrocław University of Science and Technology8.6% top 10% · 3.4k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Lithuania
- 1 Morteza Ghobakhloo #2,585 worldwide 15k citations · 136 works
- 2 Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas #8,332 worldwide 56k citations · 838 works
- 3 Dalia Štreimikienė #21,194 worldwide 25k citations · 825 works
- 4 Jelena Čelutkienė #36,225 worldwide 49k citations · 275 works
- 5 Tomas Baležentis #51,809 worldwide 12k citations · 422 works
Poland
- 1 P. Jaranowski #637 worldwide 94k citations · 375 works
- 2 T. Kunigo #1,235 worldwide 24k citations · 283 works
- 3 N. Haddad #1,253 worldwide 21k citations · 240 works
- 4 O. Arslan #1,266 worldwide 42k citations · 484 works
- 5 M. Lisovyi #1,357 worldwide 65k citations · 863 works