Netherlands vs Sweden
On research quality in 2022-now, The Netherlands ranks #9 in the world and Sweden #12, of 189 countries. The Netherlands stands higher in 25 of the 26 fields both publish in, Sweden in 1.
Research profiles alike: 0.88very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Netherlands
- World rank, 2022-now
- #9
- #9 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 191k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 14.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 48%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Medical Terminology, General Decision Sciences, Structural Biology.
Sweden
- World rank, 2022-now
- #12
- #12 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 121k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 13.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 41%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Research and Theory, Equine.
Who leads, measure by measure?
The Netherlands leads on 8 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate, citations per work, institutions in the world top 100, open access and international co-authorship. Sweden leads on 1 of 9 measures: growth.
- #9Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#12
- 1.42×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.28×
- 191kOutputfractional works, 2022-now121k
- 14.6%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited13.6%
- 34.1Citations per workall time, per fractional work32.8
- 4World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 48%Open accessof its works free to read, all time41%
- 29%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time27%
- -2%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+1%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Netherlands stands higher in 25 of 26 fields, Sweden in 1. The Netherlands leads most in Chemical Engineering (#11 against #16); Sweden leads most in Mathematics (#11 against #15). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #9Agricultural and Biological Sciences#12
- #8Arts and Humanities#13
- #9Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#11
- #5Business, Management and Accounting#12
- #11Chemical Engineering#16
- #13Chemistry#19
- #13Computer Science#14
- #5Decision Sciences#10
- #10Dentistry#14
- #8Earth and Planetary Sciences#12
- #6Economics, Econometrics and Finance#12
- #17Energy#18
- #11Engineering#14
- #10Environmental Science#11
- #8Health Professions#11
- #9Immunology and Microbiology#14
- #13Materials Science#15
- #15Mathematics#11
- #6Medicine#10
- #8Neuroscience#13
- #9Nursing#13
- #12Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#15
- #8Physics and Astronomy#13
- #6Psychology#11
- #8Social Sciences#11
- #9Veterinary#10
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Netherlands rank | Sweden rank | Netherlands top 10% | Sweden top 10% | Netherlands works | Sweden works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #9 | #12 | 16.5% | 15.3% | 5.4k | 3.3k |
| Arts and Humanities | #8 | #13 | 15.5% | 15.9% | 6k | 3.5k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #9 | #11 | 13.3% | 12.7% | 11k | 7k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #5 | #12 | 16.4% | 16.2% | 5.6k | 3.4k |
| Chemical Engineering | #11 | #16 | 12.6% | 10.2% | 542 | 362 |
| Chemistry | #13 | #19 | 13.5% | 10.7% | 1.7k | 1.3k |
| Computer Science | #13 | #14 | 11.7% | 12.3% | 12k | 8k |
| Decision Sciences | #5 | #10 | 14.3% | 12.6% | 2.5k | 1.2k |
| Dentistry | #10 | #14 | 18.4% | 17.4% | 662 | 501 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #8 | #12 | 13.1% | 13.1% | 2.8k | 1.8k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #6 | #12 | 13.6% | 13.1% | 4.7k | 2.2k |
| Energy | #17 | #18 | 10.6% | 12.0% | 1.1k | 793 |
| Engineering | #11 | #14 | 11.6% | 11.6% | 20k | 16k |
| Environmental Science | #10 | #11 | 14.0% | 12.9% | 9k | 6.6k |
| Health Professions | #8 | #11 | 14.2% | 13.7% | 6.1k | 4.1k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #9 | #14 | 13.9% | 12.1% | 2.5k | 1.5k |
| Materials Science | #13 | #15 | 11.7% | 10.6% | 3.1k | 3.2k |
| Mathematics | #15 | #11 | 12.2% | 11.4% | 1.9k | 1.4k |
| Medicine | #6 | #10 | 16.1% | 14.9% | 51k | 27k |
| Neuroscience | #8 | #13 | 12.6% | 11.6% | 5.3k | 2.5k |
| Nursing | #9 | #13 | 14.1% | 14.8% | 887 | 523 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #12 | #15 | 13.2% | 12.6% | 446 | 260 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #8 | #13 | 13.3% | 12.7% | 4.6k | 3.3k |
| Psychology | #6 | #11 | 15.3% | 12.9% | 9.7k | 5.6k |
| Social Sciences | #8 | #11 | 17.2% | 15.7% | 23k | 16k |
| Veterinary | #9 | #10 | 15.6% | 14.0% | 355 | 255 |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Netherlands
- Emotion Regulation
- Guidelines
- Aging
- Neurological Disorders
- Obesity
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Clinical Trials
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Biomarkers
- Diagnosis
- Cancer
- Renewable Energy
- Environmental Impact
- Oxidative Stress
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Public Health
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Inflammation
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Quality of Life
- Mental Health
- Treatment
- Depression
- Risk Factors
- Human Rights
- Artificial Intelligence
- Chemotherapy
- Big Data
- Immunotherapy
- Genetics
- Management
- Meta-Analysis
- Ethics
- Anxiety
- Resilience
- Heart Failure
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology11k▲ 1.26×140 topics
- Climate Change6,594◆ 1.11×131 topics
- Machine Learning5,981▼ 0.82×97 topics
- Inflammation5,839▲ 1.26×83 topics
- Deep Learning5,083▼ 0.68×85 topics
- Sustainability4,728◆ 0.89×139 topics
- Quality of Life4,599▲ 1.46×61 topics
- Globalization4,492◆ 1.05×182 topics
- Mental Health3,903▲ 1.25×47 topics
- Public Health3,634◆ 1.14×77 topics
- Treatment3,313▲ 1.25×52 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease3,186▲ 1.28×39 topics
- Depression2,953▲ 1.54×26 topics
- Oxidative Stress2,939▼ 0.82×63 topics
- Risk Factors2,929▲ 1.22×37 topics
- Environmental Impact2,862▼ 0.77×74 topics
- Human Rights2,682▲ 1.20×91 topics
- Renewable Energy2,558▼ 0.81×58 topics
- Artificial Intelligence2,544▼ 0.82×67 topics
- Cancer2,462▼ 0.84×59 topics
- Chemotherapy2,404▲ 1.56×25 topics
- Diagnosis2,398▲ 1.18×41 topics
- Big Data2,310◆ 1.11×37 topics
- Biomarkers2,265▲ 1.49×18 topics
- Immunotherapy2,187▲ 1.39×19 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome2,179▲ 1.23×24 topics
- Genetics2,129▲ 1.38×27 topics
- Clinical Trials2,079▲ 1.43×19 topics
- Management2,062▲ 1.18×40 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines2,045▲ 1.71×14 topics
- Meta-Analysis1,965▲ 1.53×21 topics
- Obesity1,959▲ 1.17×29 topics
- Ethics1,957▲ 1.77×61 topics
- Neurological Disorders1,871▲ 1.50×20 topics
- Anxiety1,841▲ 1.78×12 topics
- Aging1,766▲ 1.49×19 topics
- Resilience1,708▲ 1.59×19 topics
- Guidelines1,685▲ 1.64×13 topics
- Heart Failure1,569▲ 1.61×14 topics
- Emotion Regulation1,534▲ 2.2×9 topics
Sweden
- Quantitative Methods
- Gender Studies
- Prevalence
- Neoliberalism
- Learning
- Ethics
- Health Effects
- Obesity
- Biomarkers
- Genetics
- Qualitative Research
- Depression
- Renewable Energy
- Environmental Impact
- Education
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- Deep Learning
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Globalization
- Mental Health
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Oxidative Stress
- Treatment
- Risk Factors
- Cancer
- Pedagogy
- Big Data
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Global Burden
- Anxiety
- Resilience
- Social Sciences
- Discourse Analysis
- Special Education
- Methodology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology6,544▲ 1.18×140 topics
- Climate Change4,486▲ 1.19×130 topics
- Machine Learning3,820▼ 0.83×95 topics
- Sustainability3,715◆ 1.09×137 topics
- Inflammation3,539▲ 1.20×83 topics
- Deep Learning3,371▼ 0.70×84 topics
- Globalization3,192▲ 1.17×178 topics
- Quality of Life2,646▲ 1.32×61 topics
- Mental Health2,575▲ 1.30×48 topics
- Public Health2,428▲ 1.20×74 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease2,363▲ 1.49×39 topics
- Education2,204◆ 0.92×157 topics
- Oxidative Stress2,176◆ 0.95×63 topics
- Environmental Impact2,085◆ 0.88×72 topics
- Treatment1,949◆ 1.15×52 topics
- Renewable Energy1,903◆ 0.95×61 topics
- Risk Factors1,892▲ 1.24×37 topics
- Depression1,857▲ 1.52×26 topics
- Cancer1,618◆ 0.87×59 topics
- Qualitative Research1,570▲ 1.33×44 topics
- Pedagogy1,566▲ 2.2×30 topics
- Genetics1,468▲ 1.49×27 topics
- Big Data1,423◆ 1.07×36 topics
- Biomarkers1,375▲ 1.42×18 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome1,372▲ 1.22×24 topics
- Obesity1,261▲ 1.18×29 topics
- Global Burden1,216▲ 1.61×12 topics
- Health Effects1,214▲ 1.44×24 topics
- Anxiety1,175▲ 1.78×12 topics
- Ethics1,128▲ 1.60×61 topics
- Resilience1,072▲ 1.57×19 topics
- Learning985▲ 2.4×17 topics
- Social Sciences983▲ 4.9×23 topics
- Neoliberalism978▲ 1.95×29 topics
- Discourse Analysis974▲ 2.9×11 topics
- Prevalence974▲ 1.71×15 topics
- Special Education874▲ 11×6 topics
- Gender Studies862▲ 4.1×20 topics
- Methodology806▲ 12×7 topics
- Quantitative Methods780▲ 43×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
The Netherlands has out-published Sweden every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 4In the top 1000
- 14In the top 5009
- 17In the top 1,00012
- #11Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#14
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Netherlands or Sweden?
The Netherlands publishes 1.6× as much research as Sweden in 2022-now (191k against 121k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Netherlands or Sweden?
14.6% of the Netherlands's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 13.6% for Sweden.
Is Netherlands or Sweden growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +1% against 2018-21 for Sweden, and -2% for the Netherlands.
Which has more open access research, Netherlands or Sweden?
48% of the Netherlands's research is free to read, against 41% of Sweden's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Netherlands or Sweden?
The Netherlands holds 4 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Sweden 0; in the top 1,000 it is 17 against 12.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Netherlands
- 1University of Amsterdam17.4% top 10% · 12k works
- 2Radboud University Nijmegen15.7% top 10% · 13k works
- 3Utrecht University15.8% top 10% · 15k works
- 4University of Groningen15.8% top 10% · 14k works
- 5Erasmus University Rotterdam16.6% top 10% · 11k works
- 6Leiden University15.6% top 10% · 11k works
Sweden
- 1Karolinska Institutet16.4% top 10% · 12k works
- 2Uppsala University13.3% top 10% · 11k works
- 3University of Gothenburg14.4% top 10% · 9.8k works
- 4Lund University13.0% top 10% · 12k works
- 5Stockholm University14.7% top 10% · 7.1k works
- 6Chalmers University of Technology12.9% top 10% · 5.3k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Netherlands
- 1 Hans C. Clevers #12 worldwide 260k citations · 1,323 works
- 2 Arnold B. Bakker #298 worldwide 189k citations · 745 works
- 3 Detlef Peter van Vuuren #407 worldwide 126k citations · 877 works
- 4 Nancy Bocken #490 worldwide 37k citations · 229 works
- 5 Lourens Poorter #512 worldwide 50k citations · 402 works
Sweden
- 1 Fredrik Bäckhed #256 worldwide 117k citations · 348 works
- 2 Carl Folke #294 worldwide 182k citations · 488 works
- 3 Patrik K. E. Magnusson #1,844 worldwide 120k citations · 734 works
- 4 Anna Maria Langkilde #2,063 worldwide 23k citations · 310 works
- 5 Garry Peterson #2,140 worldwide 33k citations · 234 works
Other comparisons
Switzerlandvs
Netherlands
Australiavs
Netherlands
Canadavs
Netherlands
Spainvs
Netherlands
Italyvs
Netherlands
Spainvs
Sweden
Italyvs
Sweden
Swedenvs
Singapore
South Koreavs
Sweden
Denmarkvs
Sweden