Italy vs Sweden
On research quality in 2022-now, Italy ranks #11 in the world and Sweden #12, of 189 countries. Italy stands higher in 16 of the 26 fields both publish in, Sweden in 10.
Research profiles alike: 0.53similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Italy
- World rank, 2022-now
- #11
- #13 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 479k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 12.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 43%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Industrial relations, General Arts and Humanities, Space and Planetary Science.
Sweden
- World rank, 2022-now
- #12
- #12 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 121k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 13.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 41%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Research and Theory, Equine.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Italy leads on 4 of 9 measures: research quality, output, open access and growth. Sweden leads on 3 of 9 measures: top-10% rate, citations per work and international co-authorship. The two are level on excellence for its fields and institutions in the world top 100.
- #11Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#12
- 1.29×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.28×
- 479kOutputfractional works, 2022-now121k
- 12.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited13.6%
- 22.5Citations per workall time, per fractional work32.8
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 43%Open accessof its works free to read, all time41%
- 23%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time27%
- +10%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+1%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Italy stands higher in 16 of 26 fields, Sweden in 10. Italy leads most in Dentistry (#7 against #14); Sweden leads most in Chemical Engineering (#16 against #19). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #11Agricultural and Biological Sciences#12
- #12Arts and Humanities#13
- #16Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#11
- #9Business, Management and Accounting#12
- #19Chemical Engineering#16
- #16Chemistry#19
- #11Computer Science#14
- #13Decision Sciences#10
- #7Dentistry#14
- #11Earth and Planetary Sciences#12
- #11Economics, Econometrics and Finance#12
- #12Energy#18
- #12Engineering#14
- #12Environmental Science#11
- #12Health Professions#11
- #11Immunology and Microbiology#14
- #16Materials Science#15
- #6Mathematics#11
- #13Medicine#10
- #10Neuroscience#13
- #12Nursing#13
- #14Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#15
- #7Physics and Astronomy#13
- #13Psychology#11
- #14Social Sciences#11
- #12Veterinary#10
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Italy rank | Sweden rank | Italy top 10% | Sweden top 10% | Italy works | Sweden works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #11 | #12 | 15.7% | 15.3% | 17k | 3.3k |
| Arts and Humanities | #12 | #13 | 10.2% | 15.9% | 19k | 3.5k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #16 | #11 | 11.8% | 12.7% | 29k | 7k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #9 | #12 | 16.7% | 16.2% | 12k | 3.4k |
| Chemical Engineering | #19 | #16 | 8.6% | 10.2% | 1.5k | 362 |
| Chemistry | #16 | #19 | 9.8% | 10.7% | 5.7k | 1.3k |
| Computer Science | #11 | #14 | 11.2% | 12.3% | 30k | 8k |
| Decision Sciences | #13 | #10 | 12.7% | 12.6% | 3.8k | 1.2k |
| Dentistry | #7 | #14 | 21.7% | 17.4% | 2.6k | 501 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #11 | #12 | 11.0% | 13.1% | 10k | 1.8k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #11 | #12 | 12.5% | 13.1% | 11k | 2.2k |
| Energy | #12 | #18 | 10.0% | 12.0% | 2.9k | 793 |
| Engineering | #12 | #14 | 10.2% | 11.6% | 67k | 16k |
| Environmental Science | #12 | #11 | 11.2% | 12.9% | 23k | 6.6k |
| Health Professions | #12 | #11 | 15.6% | 13.7% | 8.1k | 4.1k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #11 | #14 | 12.9% | 12.1% | 5.3k | 1.5k |
| Materials Science | #16 | #15 | 8.6% | 10.6% | 11k | 3.2k |
| Mathematics | #6 | #11 | 12.1% | 11.4% | 7.2k | 1.4k |
| Medicine | #13 | #10 | 15.4% | 14.9% | 129k | 27k |
| Neuroscience | #10 | #13 | 12.5% | 11.6% | 11k | 2.5k |
| Nursing | #12 | #13 | 15.2% | 14.8% | 2.1k | 523 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #14 | #15 | 13.6% | 12.6% | 1.2k | 260 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #7 | #13 | 10.5% | 12.7% | 18k | 3.3k |
| Psychology | #13 | #11 | 14.7% | 12.9% | 14k | 5.6k |
| Social Sciences | #14 | #11 | 11.9% | 15.7% | 37k | 16k |
| Veterinary | #12 | #10 | 15.3% | 14.0% | 912 | 255 |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Italy
- Italy
- Echocardiography
- Literature
- Prognostic Factors
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Neurological Disorders
- Biomarkers
- Identity
- Management
- Innovation
- Neural Networks
- Chemotherapy
- Remote Sensing
- Diagnosis
- Cultural Heritage
- Quality of Life
- Oxidative Stress
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Treatment
- Environmental Impact
- Globalization
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Cancer
- Immunotherapy
- Risk Factors
- Public Health
- Genetics
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Clinical Trials
- Obesity
- Genetic Mutations
- Heart Failure
- Guidelines
- Complications
- Urban Planning
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology27k▲ 1.22×140 topics
- Climate Change16k◆ 1.11×132 topics
- Machine Learning15k▼ 0.82×97 topics
- Deep Learning15k▼ 0.77×85 topics
- Inflammation14k▲ 1.25×83 topics
- Sustainability13k◆ 1.00×140 topics
- Treatment9,894▲ 1.49×52 topics
- Oxidative Stress9,864◆ 1.10×63 topics
- Environmental Impact9,329◆ 1.00×74 topics
- Quality of Life9,189▲ 1.17×61 topics
- Globalization8,884▼ 0.83×186 topics
- Cultural Heritage8,644▲ 3.0×40 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease7,916▲ 1.27×39 topics
- Diagnosis7,824▲ 1.54×41 topics
- Cancer7,806◆ 1.07×59 topics
- Remote Sensing7,239◆ 1.09×42 topics
- Immunotherapy6,484▲ 1.65×19 topics
- Chemotherapy6,439▲ 1.67×25 topics
- Risk Factors6,280◆ 1.05×37 topics
- Neural Networks6,165▼ 0.73×42 topics
- Public Health6,139▼ 0.77×77 topics
- Innovation5,919◆ 1.05×90 topics
- Genetics5,915▲ 1.54×27 topics
- Management5,743▲ 1.32×40 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome5,706▲ 1.29×24 topics
- Identity5,391▲ 1.37×80 topics
- Clinical Trials5,280▲ 1.45×19 topics
- Biomarkers5,232▲ 1.38×18 topics
- Obesity5,218▲ 1.24×29 topics
- Neurological Disorders5,214▲ 1.68×20 topics
- Genetic Mutations4,983▲ 2.1×23 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines4,902▲ 1.64×14 topics
- Heart Failure4,469▲ 1.84×14 topics
- Prognostic Factors4,419▲ 1.87×14 topics
- Guidelines4,360▲ 1.70×13 topics
- Literature4,118▲ 1.38×64 topics
- Complications4,115▲ 1.52×17 topics
- Echocardiography3,514▲ 2.3×8 topics
- Urban Planning2,099▲ 4.5×15 topics
- Italy1,777▲ 13×2 topics
Sweden
- Quantitative Methods
- Gender Studies
- Prevalence
- Neoliberalism
- Learning
- Ethics
- Health Effects
- Obesity
- Biomarkers
- Genetics
- Qualitative Research
- Depression
- Renewable Energy
- Environmental Impact
- Education
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- Deep Learning
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Globalization
- Mental Health
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Oxidative Stress
- Treatment
- Risk Factors
- Cancer
- Pedagogy
- Big Data
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Global Burden
- Anxiety
- Resilience
- Social Sciences
- Discourse Analysis
- Special Education
- Methodology
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology6,544▲ 1.18×140 topics
- Climate Change4,486▲ 1.19×130 topics
- Machine Learning3,820▼ 0.83×95 topics
- Sustainability3,715◆ 1.09×137 topics
- Inflammation3,539▲ 1.20×83 topics
- Deep Learning3,371▼ 0.70×84 topics
- Globalization3,192▲ 1.17×178 topics
- Quality of Life2,646▲ 1.32×61 topics
- Mental Health2,575▲ 1.30×48 topics
- Public Health2,428▲ 1.20×74 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease2,363▲ 1.49×39 topics
- Education2,204◆ 0.92×157 topics
- Oxidative Stress2,176◆ 0.95×63 topics
- Environmental Impact2,085◆ 0.88×72 topics
- Treatment1,949◆ 1.15×52 topics
- Renewable Energy1,903◆ 0.95×61 topics
- Risk Factors1,892▲ 1.24×37 topics
- Depression1,857▲ 1.52×26 topics
- Cancer1,618◆ 0.87×59 topics
- Qualitative Research1,570▲ 1.33×44 topics
- Pedagogy1,566▲ 2.2×30 topics
- Genetics1,468▲ 1.49×27 topics
- Big Data1,423◆ 1.07×36 topics
- Biomarkers1,375▲ 1.42×18 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome1,372▲ 1.22×24 topics
- Obesity1,261▲ 1.18×29 topics
- Global Burden1,216▲ 1.61×12 topics
- Health Effects1,214▲ 1.44×24 topics
- Anxiety1,175▲ 1.78×12 topics
- Ethics1,128▲ 1.60×61 topics
- Resilience1,072▲ 1.57×19 topics
- Learning985▲ 2.4×17 topics
- Social Sciences983▲ 4.9×23 topics
- Neoliberalism978▲ 1.95×29 topics
- Discourse Analysis974▲ 2.9×11 topics
- Prevalence974▲ 1.71×15 topics
- Special Education874▲ 11×6 topics
- Gender Studies862▲ 4.1×20 topics
- Methodology806▲ 12×7 topics
- Quantitative Methods780▲ 43×2 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Italy has out-published Sweden every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 14In the top 5009
- 38In the top 1,00012
- #9Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#14
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Italy or Sweden?
Italy publishes 4.0× as much research as Sweden in 2022-now (479k against 121k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Italy or Sweden?
13.6% of Sweden's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 12.8% for Italy.
Is Italy or Sweden growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +10% against 2018-21 for Italy, and +1% for Sweden.
Which has more open access research, Italy or Sweden?
43% of Italy's research is free to read, against 41% of Sweden's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Italy or Sweden?
Italy holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Sweden 0; in the top 1,000 it is 38 against 12.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Italy
- 1University of Padua13.0% top 10% · 17k works
- 2Sapienza University of Rome12.5% top 10% · 24k works
- 3University of Bologna12.5% top 10% · 17k works
- 4National Research Council12.6% top 10% · 19k works
- 5University of Naples Federico II14.3% top 10% · 15k works
- 6University of Turin12.9% top 10% · 11k works
Sweden
- 1Karolinska Institutet16.4% top 10% · 12k works
- 2Uppsala University13.3% top 10% · 11k works
- 3University of Gothenburg14.4% top 10% · 9.8k works
- 4Lund University13.0% top 10% · 12k works
- 5Stockholm University14.7% top 10% · 7.1k works
- 6Chalmers University of Technology12.9% top 10% · 5.3k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Italy
- 1 M. Razzano #143 worldwide 134k citations · 578 works
- 2 Stefano Carniani #211 worldwide 17k citations · 427 works
- 3 F. Pannarale #213 worldwide 85k citations · 265 works
- 4 M. Pesce-Rollins #346 worldwide 55k citations · 464 works
- 5 Nicola Segata #448 worldwide 122k citations · 539 works
Sweden
- 1 Fredrik Bäckhed #256 worldwide 117k citations · 348 works
- 2 Carl Folke #294 worldwide 182k citations · 488 works
- 3 Patrik K. E. Magnusson #1,844 worldwide 120k citations · 734 works
- 4 Anna Maria Langkilde #2,063 worldwide 23k citations · 310 works
- 5 Garry Peterson #2,140 worldwide 33k citations · 234 works
Other comparisons
Canadavs
Italy
Italyvs
Netherlands
Netherlandsvs
Sweden
Spainvs
Italy
Spainvs
Sweden
Italyvs
Singapore
Italyvs
South Korea
Swedenvs
Singapore
South Koreavs
Sweden
Denmarkvs
Sweden