Group for the Analysis of Development
In research, Group for the Analysis of Development stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,854 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #19,420 of 22,385 · #17,558 all time
- Rank in Peru
- #97 of 99
- Research works
- 306 ▼ 16% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 4.6k 15.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 10.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.96× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 69% world 40%
- International
- 41% world 18%
What is Group for the Analysis of Development known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,854 of 14,833 | 12.1% | 174 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Group for the Analysis of Development sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Group for the Analysis of Development work in?
In 2022-now, 47% of research at Group for the Analysis of Development is in Social Sciences, 27% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (25%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (10%), Medicine (8%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences3447.1%
- Social Sciences1825.1%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance710.1%
- Business, Management and Accounting34.8%
- Psychology33.9%
- Decision Sciences22.8%
- Arts and Humanities00.4%
- Physical Sciences1926.9%
- Environmental Science67.8%
- Engineering57.5%
- Computer Science34.9%
- Chemistry22.5%
- Materials Science12.1%
- Energy11.8%
- Mathematics00.4%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
- Health Sciences1014.7%
- Medicine68.4%
- Health Professions44.9%
- Nursing11.1%
- Veterinary00.2%
- Life Sciences811.3%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 22 fields, with their numbers
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.70×7 works
- Decision Sciences2.92×2 works
- Nursing2.26×1 works
- Social Sciences1.99×18 works
- Energy1.92×1 works
- Health Professions1.87×4 works
- Veterinary1.72×0 works
- Chemistry1.58×2 works
- Environmental Science1.57×6 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.54×5 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.48×3 works
- Psychology1.27×3 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.66×0 works
- Computer Science0.62×4 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.61×2 works
- Materials Science0.59×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.50×0 works
- Engineering0.50×5 works
- Medicine0.44×6 works
- Mathematics0.30×0 works
- Arts and Humanities0.15×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.05×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.7×
- Decision Sciences 2.9×
- Nursing 2.3×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Energy 1.9×
- Health Professions 1.9×
- Veterinary 1.7×
- Chemistry 1.6×
- Environmental Science 1.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.5×
- Psychology 1.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Materials Science 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Group for the Analysis of Development?
Ranked on the quality score, Alan Sánchez, Javier Escobal and Santiago Cueto lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Group for the Analysis of Development.
- 1
Alan Sánchez
Peru · #888,697 worldwide 992 citations · 134 works
- 2
Javier Escobal
Peru · #1,029,326 worldwide 2.2k citations · 164 works
- 3
Santiago Cueto
Peru · #1,247,122 worldwide 6.5k citations · 206 works
- 4
Eduardo Zegarra
Peru · #1,429,654 worldwide 442 citations · 23 works
- 5
Ricardo Fort
Peru · #1,876,946 worldwide 786 citations · 64 works
- 6
Martín Valdivia
Peru · #1,889,324 worldwide 1.5k citations · 127 works
- 7
Juan León
Peru · #1,991,209 worldwide 1.7k citations · 101 works
- 8
Carmen Ponce
Peru · #2,362,555 worldwide 296 citations · 48 works
- 9
Claudia Sugimaru
Peru · #2,422,242 worldwide 170 citations · 20 works
- 10
Miguel Jaramillo
Peru · #2,498,423 worldwide 498 citations · 81 works
Which keywords describe research at Group for the Analysis of Development?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Sustainable Development, Small and Medium Enterprises, Mental Health, Sustainability, Economic Growth, Rural Tourism and Organizational Culture.
- Nutritional Consequences
- Food Insecurity
- Digital Divide
- Social Determinants
- Institutional Quality
- Environmental Education
- Neoliberalism
- Economic Analysis
- Gender Inequality
- Rural Development
- Public Policy
- E-Learning
- Labor Market
- Agricultural Sustainability
- Regional Development
- Consumer Behavior
- COVID-19
- Economic Growth
- Mental Health
- Sustainability
- Globalization
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Rural Tourism
- Organizational Culture
- Financial Performance
- Leadership Emergence
- Pandemic
- Health Outcomes
- Risk Management
- Social Justice
- Technology
- Digital Transformation
- Chronic Disease
- Gender Equality
- Poverty Reduction
- Social Networks
- Education Policy
- Inequality
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization6▲ 4.0×22 topics
- Sustainability6▲ 3.2×26 topics
- Sustainable Development5▲ 4.6×12 topics
- Mental Health5▲ 4.5×8 topics
- Education4▲ 3.2×15 topics
- Economic Growth4▲ 6.5×6 topics
- Small and Medium Enterprises4▲ 29×4 topics
- COVID-194▲ 3.8×9 topics
- Rural Tourism3▲ 138×3 topics
- Consumer Behavior3▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Organizational Culture3▲ 11×5 topics
- Regional Development3▲ 12×3 topics
- Financial Performance3▲ 6.8×2 topics
- Agricultural Sustainability2▲ 31×1 topic
- Leadership Emergence2▲ 255×1 topic
- Labor Market2▲ 12×5 topics
- Pandemic2▲ 3.4×5 topics
- E-Learning2▲ 3.1×4 topics
- Health Outcomes2▲ 11×2 topics
- Public Policy2▲ 6.2×8 topics
- Risk Management2▲ 6.0×3 topics
- Rural Development2▲ 8.3×9 topics
- Social Justice2▲ 4.7×7 topics
- Gender Inequality2▲ 19×4 topics
- Technology2▲ 5.0×4 topics
- Economic Analysis2▲ 18×4 topics
- Digital Transformation2▲ 4.3×4 topics
- Neoliberalism2▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Chronic Disease2▲ 13×3 topics
- Environmental Education1▲ 13×5 topics
- Gender Equality1▲ 6.8×4 topics
- Institutional Quality1▲ 18×3 topics
- Poverty Reduction1▲ 15×2 topics
- Social Determinants1▲ 9.5×2 topics
- Social Networks1▲ 7.3×5 topics
- Digital Divide1▲ 7.2×3 topics
- Education Policy1▲ 26×3 topics
- Food Insecurity1▲ 31×1 topic
- Inequality1▲ 8.0×8 topics
- Nutritional Consequences1▲ 38×1 topic
Which research topics does Group for the Analysis of Development publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Regional Development and Management Studies, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts and Education and Teacher Training.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Regional Development and Management Studies Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 2 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 1 works
- 3 COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 4 Education and Teacher Training Education 1 works
- 5 Global Educational Policies and Reforms Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 6 Taxation and Compliance Studies Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 7 Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning Information Systems 1 works
- 8 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
- 9 Renewable energy and sustainable power systems Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1 works
- 10 Construction Project Management and Performance Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Group for the Analysis of Development's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 16% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Group for the Analysis of Development as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00022% in 2024.
Fractional works of Group for the Analysis of Development over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Lima
- National University of San Marcos
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
- Peruvian University of Applied Sciences
- Universidad de Lima
- Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
- Universidad de San Martín de Porres
- Universidad Científica del Sur
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Group for the Analysis of Development. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
