Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Lima · Peru

Group for the Analysis of Development

In research, Group for the Analysis of Development stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,854 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, 2022-now
#19,420
of 22,385 · #17,558 all time
Rank in Peru
#97
of 99
Research works
306
▼ 16% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.6k
15.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.96×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
69%
world 40%
International
41%
world 18%

What is Group for the Analysis of Development known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #7,854 of 14,833 12.1%174

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Group for the Analysis of Development sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Group for the Analysis of Development work in?

In 2022-now, 47% of research at Group for the Analysis of Development is in Social Sciences, 27% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (25%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (10%), Medicine (8%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 34 fractional works · 47.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 18 fractional works · 25.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 5 fractional works · 7.0% of its workEducation: 5 fractional works · 6.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workCultural Studies: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 7 fractional works · 10.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 7 fractional works · 9.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3 fractional works · 4.8% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBusiness and International Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workTourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 3.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 19 fractional works · 26.9% of its workEnvironmental Science: 6 fractional works · 7.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workWater Science and Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 5 fractional works · 7.5% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 4.9% of its workInformation Systems: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnergy: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 10 fractional works · 14.7% of its workMedicine: 6 fractional works · 8.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 4 fractional works · 4.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEquine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 8 fractional works · 11.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 5 fractional works · 7.3% of its workSoil Science: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 3.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKGroup for theAnalysis of…71fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences11%Physical Sciences27%Health Sciences15%Social Sciences47%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1825.1%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance710.1%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting34.8%
    4. Psychology33.9%
    5. Decision Sciences22.8%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.4%
    1. Environmental Science67.8%
    2. Engineering57.5%
    3. Computer Science34.9%
    4. Chemistry22.5%
    5. Materials Science12.1%
    6. Energy11.8%
    7. Mathematics00.4%
    8. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
    1. Medicine68.4%
    2. Health Professions44.9%
    3. Nursing11.1%
    4. Veterinary00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences57.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology23.3%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.5%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.54× its world share, 5 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.61× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 1.58× its world share, 2 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.62× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 1.92× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.50× its world share, 5 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.57× its world share, 6 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.59× its world share, 2 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 1.87× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.44× its world share, 6 worksMedicineNursing: 2.26× its world share, 1 worksNursingVeterinary: 1.72× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.48× its world share, 3 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.92× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.70× its world share, 7 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.27× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.99× its world share, 18 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 22 fields, with their numbers
  1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.70×7 works
  2. Decision Sciences2.92×2 works
  3. Nursing2.26×1 works
  4. Social Sciences1.99×18 works
  5. Energy1.92×1 works
  6. Health Professions1.87×4 works
  7. Veterinary1.72×0 works
  8. Chemistry1.58×2 works
  9. Environmental Science1.57×6 works
  10. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.54×5 works
  11. Business, Management and Accounting1.48×3 works
  12. Psychology1.27×3 works
  13. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.66×0 works
  14. Computer Science0.62×4 works
  15. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.61×2 works
  16. Materials Science0.59×2 works
  17. Immunology and Microbiology0.50×0 works
  18. Engineering0.50×5 works
  19. Medicine0.44×6 works
  20. Mathematics0.30×0 works
  21. Arts and Humanities0.15×0 works
  22. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.05×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Group for the Analysis of Development?

Ranked on the quality score, Alan Sánchez, Javier Escobal and Santiago Cueto lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Group for the Analysis of Development.

  1. 1 Alan Sánchez Peru · #888,697 worldwide 992 citations · 134 works
  2. 2 Javier Escobal Peru · #1,029,326 worldwide 2.2k citations · 164 works
  3. 3 Santiago Cueto Peru · #1,247,122 worldwide 6.5k citations · 206 works
  4. 4 Eduardo Zegarra Peru · #1,429,654 worldwide 442 citations · 23 works
  5. 5 Ricardo Fort Peru · #1,876,946 worldwide 786 citations · 64 works
  6. 6 Martín Valdivia Peru · #1,889,324 worldwide 1.5k citations · 127 works
  7. 7 Juan León Peru · #1,991,209 worldwide 1.7k citations · 101 works
  8. 8 Carmen Ponce Peru · #2,362,555 worldwide 296 citations · 48 works
  9. 9 Claudia Sugimaru Peru · #2,422,242 worldwide 170 citations · 20 works
  10. 10 Miguel Jaramillo Peru · #2,498,423 worldwide 498 citations · 81 works
All ranked researchers at Group for the Analysis of Development

What are the most cited papers from Group for the Analysis of Development?

The most cited paper from Group for the Analysis of Development is "Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries" (Sally Grantham‐McGregor, Yin Bun Cheung, Santiago Cueto et al., 2007), with 3,673 citations. Next come "Teaching Entrepreneurship: Impact of Business Training on Microfinance Clients and Institutions" (734) and "The Determinants of Nonfarm Income Diversification in Rural Peru" (349).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries Sally Grantham‐McGregor, Yin Bun Cheung, Santiago Cueto et al. · The Lancet Open access 2007 3,673
2 Teaching Entrepreneurship: Impact of Business Training on Microfinance Clients and Institutions Dean Karlan, Martín Valdivia · The Review of Economics and Statistics 5 Aug 2010 734
3 The Determinants of Nonfarm Income Diversification in Rural Peru Javier Escobal · World Development Mar 2001 349
4 The Impact of Fair Trade Certification for Coffee Farmers in Peru Ruerd Ruben, Ricardo Fort · World Development 10 Sep 2011 306
5 Postinfancy growth, schooling, and cognitive achievement: Young Lives Benjamin T. Crookston, Whitney Schott, Santiago Cueto et al. · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Open access 26 Sep 2013 219
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Group for the Analysis of Development?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Sustainable Development, Small and Medium Enterprises, Mental Health, Sustainability, Economic Growth, Rural Tourism and Organizational Culture.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Globalization6▲ 4.0×22 topics
  2. Sustainability6▲ 3.2×26 topics
  3. Sustainable Development5▲ 4.6×12 topics
  4. Mental Health5▲ 4.5×8 topics
  5. Education4▲ 3.2×15 topics
  6. Economic Growth4▲ 6.5×6 topics
  7. Small and Medium Enterprises4▲ 29×4 topics
  8. COVID-194▲ 3.8×9 topics
  9. Rural Tourism3▲ 138×3 topics
  10. Consumer Behavior3▲ 6.5×7 topics
  11. Organizational Culture3▲ 11×5 topics
  12. Regional Development3▲ 12×3 topics
  13. Financial Performance3▲ 6.8×2 topics
  14. Agricultural Sustainability2▲ 31×1 topic
  15. Leadership Emergence2▲ 255×1 topic
  16. Labor Market2▲ 12×5 topics
  17. Pandemic2▲ 3.4×5 topics
  18. E-Learning2▲ 3.1×4 topics
  19. Health Outcomes2▲ 11×2 topics
  20. Public Policy2▲ 6.2×8 topics
  21. Risk Management2▲ 6.0×3 topics
  22. Rural Development2▲ 8.3×9 topics
  23. Social Justice2▲ 4.7×7 topics
  24. Gender Inequality2▲ 19×4 topics
  25. Technology2▲ 5.0×4 topics
  26. Economic Analysis2▲ 18×4 topics
  27. Digital Transformation2▲ 4.3×4 topics
  28. Neoliberalism2▲ 6.0×5 topics
  29. Chronic Disease2▲ 13×3 topics
  30. Environmental Education1▲ 13×5 topics
  31. Gender Equality1▲ 6.8×4 topics
  32. Institutional Quality1▲ 18×3 topics
  33. Poverty Reduction1▲ 15×2 topics
  34. Social Determinants1▲ 9.5×2 topics
  35. Social Networks1▲ 7.3×5 topics
  36. Digital Divide1▲ 7.2×3 topics
  37. Education Policy1▲ 26×3 topics
  38. Food Insecurity1▲ 31×1 topic
  39. Inequality1▲ 8.0×8 topics
  40. Nutritional Consequences1▲ 38×1 topic

Which research topics does Group for the Analysis of Development publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Regional Development and Management Studies, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts and Education and Teacher Training.

  1. 1 Regional Development and Management Studies Economics and Econometrics 2 works
  2. 2 Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations General Health Professions 1 works
  3. 3 COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  4. 4 Education and Teacher Training Education 1 works
  5. 5 Global Educational Policies and Reforms Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  6. 6 Taxation and Compliance Studies Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  7. 7 Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning Information Systems 1 works
  8. 8 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
  9. 9 Renewable energy and sustainable power systems Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1 works
  10. 10 Construction Project Management and Performance Management Science and Operations Research 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available68.6%not open31.4%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors40.6%domestic only59.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Group for the Analysis of Development's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 16% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Group for the Analysis of Development as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00022% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Group for the Analysis of Development0.00024% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Group for the Analysis of Development over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Lima

All research institutions in Lima

Share Group for the Analysis of Development's ranking

Group for the Analysis of Development on Science Explorer

A card with Group for the Analysis of Development's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Group for the Analysis of Development. Posts are plain text and can be reported.