Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Oklahoma City · United States

Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Research works
71
▲ 14% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.6k
64.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
16.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
12%
world 40%
International
2%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality work in?

In all years, 60% of research at Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality is in Health Sciences, 15% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (43%), Health Professions (16%), Engineering (13%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 43 fractional works · 59.9% of its workMedicine: 31 fractional works · 43.3% of its workEpidemiology: 9 fractional works · 13.1% of its workSurgery: 4 fractional works · 5.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPhysiology: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workInternal Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHepatology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 12 fractional works · 16.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 9 fractional works · 12.9% of its workHealth Information Management: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 11 fractional works · 15.4% of its workEngineering: 9 fractional works · 13.1% of its workOcean Engineering: 6 fractional works · 9.0% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 13.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 5 fractional works · 6.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 5 fractional works · 6.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.8% of its workHealth: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workArcheology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 8 fractional works · 11.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 5.8% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 3 fractional works · 4.7% of its workImmunology: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKOklahomaFoundation for…71fractional works, all years
Life Sciences12%Physical Sciences15%Health Sciences60%Social Sciences13%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine3143.3%
    2. Health Professions1216.3%
    3. Nursing00.3%
    1. Engineering913.1%
    2. Chemistry10.8%
    3. Environmental Science00.5%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.5%
    5. Materials Science00.2%
    6. Physics and Astronomy00.2%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance56.8%
    2. Social Sciences34.8%
    3. Arts and Humanities11.4%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology45.8%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology34.7%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.5%
    4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.4%
    5. Neuroscience00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.00× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemistry: 5.96× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEnvironmental Science: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 2.68× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 4.20× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 4.33× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.79× its world share, 1 worksMedicine1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemistry, 6.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Chemistry5.96×0 works
  2. Health Professions4.33×0 works
  3. Physics and Astronomy4.20×0 works
  4. Medicine2.79×1 works
  5. Materials Science2.68×0 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.00×0 works
  7. Environmental Science0.33×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality?

Ranked on the quality score, Dale W. Bratzler, Allen Ma and Wato Nsa lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality.

  1. 1 Dale W. Bratzler United States · #271,020 worldwide 18k citations · 135 works
  2. 2 Allen Ma United States · #1,014,033 worldwide 2.6k citations · 32 works
  3. 3 Wato Nsa United States · #1,316,246 worldwide 2.8k citations · 48 works
All ranked researchers at Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

What are the most cited papers from Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality?

The most cited paper from Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality is "Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project" (Dale W. Bratzler, Peter M. Houck, 2005), with 1,168 citations. Next come "Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgery: An Advisory Statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project" (884) and "Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement" (857).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project Dale W. Bratzler, Peter M. Houck · The American Journal of Surgery Apr 2005 1,168
2 Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgery: An Advisory Statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project William Dale, M. Peter, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup · Clinical Infectious Diseases Open access 2 Jun 2004 884
3 Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement Peter K. Lindenauer, Denise Remus, Sheila H. Roman et al. · New England Journal of Medicine 26 Jan 2007 857
4 Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Outcomes for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Peter M. Houck, Dale W. Bratzler, Wato Nsa et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine 22 Mar 2004 803
5 Healthcare Epidemiology: The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: National Initiatives to Improve Outcomes for Patients Having Surgery Dale W. Bratzler, David R. Hunt · Clinical Infectious Diseases 30 Jun 2006 583
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Primary Care, Epidemiology, Quality Improvement, Antimicrobial Resistance, Health Care Utilization, Chronic Disease Management, Healthcare-Associated Infections and Continuity of Care.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology11▲ 4.0×17 topics
  2. Primary Care9▲ 29×5 topics
  3. Quality Improvement7▲ 48×4 topics
  4. Antimicrobial Resistance5▲ 28×4 topics
  5. Inflammation5▲ 2.9×17 topics
  6. Chronic Disease Management4▲ 41×2 topics
  7. Health Care Utilization4▲ 44×2 topics
  8. Healthcare-Associated Infections4▲ 49×4 topics
  9. Risk Factors4▲ 5.8×6 topics
  10. Continuity of Care4▲ 96×2 topics
  11. Patient-Centered Medical Home4▲ 119×1 topic
  12. Pay for Performance4▲ 119×1 topic
  13. Health Care Spending4▲ 87×1 topic
  14. Insurance Markets4▲ 87×1 topic
  15. Clinical Practice Guidelines4▲ 9.2×4 topics
  16. Optimization4▲ 8.9×2 topics
  17. Data Assimilation3▲ 25×1 topic
  18. Ensemble Kalman Filter3▲ 39×1 topic
  19. Guidelines3▲ 8.3×7 topics
  20. Diagnosis3▲ 3.6×8 topics
  21. Respiratory3▲ 36×2 topics
  22. Pathogenesis2▲ 6.1×4 topics
  23. Vaccination2▲ 46×2 topics
  24. Respiratory Infections2▲ 36×2 topics
  25. Clinical Guidelines2▲ 11×2 topics
  26. Community-Acquired Pneumonia2▲ 80×1 topic
  27. Management2▲ 4.2×6 topics
  28. Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine2▲ 80×1 topic
  29. Patient Satisfaction2▲ 12×4 topics
  30. Influenza2▲ 61×1 topic
  31. Mortality2▲ 5.8×4 topics
  32. Virus2▲ 24×1 topic
  33. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis2▲ 153×1 topic
  34. Catheter-Associated Infections2▲ 83×1 topic
  35. Surgical Site Infection2▲ 153×1 topic
  36. Urinary Tract Infections2▲ 65×1 topic
  37. Clinical Outcomes2▲ 14×2 topics
  38. ICU2▲ 93×1 topic
  39. Surfactants2▲ 21×4 topics
  40. Ventilator-associated Pneumonia2▲ 93×1 topic

Which research topics does Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research, Surfactants and Colloidal Systems, Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization and Frailty in Older Adults.

  1. 1 Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research Physiology 0 works
  2. 2 Surfactants and Colloidal Systems Organic Chemistry 0 works
  3. 3 Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization Materials Chemistry 0 works
  4. 4 Frailty in Older Adults Geriatrics and Gerontology 0 works
  5. 5 Vasculitis and related conditions Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  6. 6 Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments Physiology 0 works
  7. 7 Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 0 works
  8. 8 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 0 works
  9. 9 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  10. 10 Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques Molecular Biology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available12.4%not open87.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors1.5%domestic only98.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 14% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000090% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality0.00000051% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Oklahoma City

All research institutions in Oklahoma City

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.