Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Saint Paul · United States

Twin Cities Public Television

Research works
119
▲ 54% vs 2018-21
Citations
3.1k
26.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.6%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
47%
world 40%
International
21%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Twin Cities Public Television is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Twin Cities Public Television work in?

In 2022-now, 33% of research at Twin Cities Public Television is in Life Sciences, 31% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (21%), Social Sciences (18%), Medicine (12%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 13 fractional works · 33.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 8 fractional works · 21.3% of its workPlant Science: 3 fractional works · 8.2% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 9.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 4.1% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBehavioral Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 30.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 18.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 4.9% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 8.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 8 fractional works · 20.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 8.0% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 6.1% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workInorganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workElectrochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workProcess Chemistry and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 6 fractional works · 15.9% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 11.5% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLeadership and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKTwin CitiesPublic Television39fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences33%Physical Sciences21%Health Sciences16%Social Sciences31%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences821.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology49.7%
    3. Neuroscience11.4%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.5%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    1. Social Sciences718.0%
    2. Psychology38.7%
    3. Arts and Humanities13.0%
    4. Decision Sciences00.4%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.4%
    1. Environmental Science38.0%
    2. Engineering26.1%
    3. Energy11.9%
    4. Chemistry11.5%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.3%
    6. Computer Science01.0%
    7. Materials Science00.4%
    8. Chemical Engineering00.3%
    1. Medicine411.5%
    2. Health Professions23.9%
    3. Nursing00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 4.49× its world share, 8 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.81× its world share, 4 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.48× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.85× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 0.82× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.99× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.84× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 2.10× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.41× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.61× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 1.47× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.60× its world share, 4 worksMedicineNursing: 0.94× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.04× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.85× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.42× its world share, 7 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 4.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 21 fields, with their numbers
  1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences4.49×8 works
  2. Psychology2.85×3 works
  3. Energy2.10×1 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.81×4 works
  5. Environmental Science1.61×3 works
  6. Health Professions1.47×2 works
  7. Social Sciences1.42×7 works
  8. Arts and Humanities1.04×1 works
  9. Chemistry0.99×1 works
  10. Nursing0.94×0 works
  11. Neuroscience0.85×0 works
  12. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.84×0 works
  13. Chemical Engineering0.82×0 works
  14. Medicine0.60×4 works
  15. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.49×0 works
  16. Immunology and Microbiology0.48×0 works
  17. Decision Sciences0.44×0 works
  18. Engineering0.41×2 works
  19. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.19×0 works
  20. Computer Science0.13×0 works
  21. Materials Science0.11×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Twin Cities Public Television?

Ranked on the quality score, Ashley Shelby and Albert C. Holler lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Twin Cities Public Television.

  1. 1 Ashley Shelby United States · #1,847,474 worldwide 246 citations · 37 works
  2. 2 Albert C. Holler United States · #3,828,897 worldwide 119 citations · 19 works
All ranked researchers at Twin Cities Public Television

What are the most cited papers from Twin Cities Public Television?

The most cited paper from Twin Cities Public Television is "Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Kerry L. Donnelly, Coleman I. Smith, Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg et al., 2005), with 3,526 citations. Next come "Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes" (1,868) and "Bioimpedance at the Bedside" (334).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Kerry L. Donnelly, Coleman I. Smith, Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg et al. · Journal of Clinical Investigation Open access 2 May 2005 3,526
2 Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes Forest Isaac Isbell et al. · Nature Open access Oct 2015 1,868
3 Bioimpedance at the Bedside Urvashi Mulasi, Adam J. Kuchnia, Abigail J. Cole et al. · Nutrition in Clinical Practice 22 Jan 2015 334
4 Mapping human pressures on biodiversity across the planet uncovers anthropogenic threat complexes Diana E. Bowler et al. · People and Nature Open access 27 Feb 2020 294
5 Auxin signaling Marcel Quint, William M. Gray · Current Opinion in Plant Biology ReviewOpen access 30 Jul 2006 277
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Twin Cities Public Television?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Environmental Impact, Technology Integration, Social Media, Neoliberalism, Feminism, Geodetic and Monitoring.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 17 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 17 words, with their numbers
  1. Environmental Impact2▲ 3.1×8 topics
  2. Mental Health2▲ 3.6×13 topics
  3. Climate Change2▲ 1.62×19 topics
  4. Social Media2▲ 3.2×6 topics
  5. Sustainability2▲ 1.76×11 topics
  6. Epidemiology2◆ 0.94×19 topics
  7. Technology Integration1▲ 10×2 topics
  8. Gender1▲ 5.4×3 topics
  9. Genetics1▲ 4.0×8 topics
  10. Neoliberalism1▲ 7.9×2 topics
  11. Oxidative Stress1▲ 1.74×10 topics
  12. Feminism1▲ 8.8×1 topic
  13. Geodetic1▲ 325×1 topic
  14. Monitoring1▲ 28×1 topic
  15. Multimodal Literacy1▲ 139×1 topic
  16. New Literacies1▲ 139×1 topic
  17. Postfeminism1▲ 80×1 topic

Which research topics does Twin Cities Public Television publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures, Gender, Feminism, and Media, Literacy, Media, and Education and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development.

  1. 1 Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures Civil and Structural Engineering 1 works
  2. 2 Gender, Feminism, and Media Gender Studies 1 works
  3. 3 Literacy, Media, and Education Literature and Literary Theory 1 works
  4. 4 Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Clinical Psychology 1 works
  5. 5 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Health Information Management 0 works
  6. 6 Research studies in Vietnam Ecology 0 works
  7. 7 Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 0 works
  8. 8 Chromosomal and Genetic Variations Plant Science 0 works
  9. 9 Child Abuse and Trauma Clinical Psychology 0 works
  10. 10 Plant Diversity and Evolution Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available46.7%not open53.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors20.8%domestic only79.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Twin Cities Public Television's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 54% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Twin Cities Public Television as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00012% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%Twin Cities Public Television0.00018% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Twin Cities Public Television over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Saint Paul

All research institutions in Saint Paul

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Twin Cities Public Television. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.