Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Surgery

Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries is a research topic within Surgery. Science Explorer counts 28k research works in it since 1950. 9.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the operative management, epidemiology, and outcomes of pelvic fractures, including acetabular and sacral fractures. It covers topics such as hemorrhage control, surgical treatment modalities, embolization, mortality predictors, and complications associated with pelvic fractures.

  • Pelvic Fractures
  • Acetabular Fractures
  • Hemorrhage
  • Surgical Treatment
  • Embolization
  • Sacral Fractures
  • Internal Fixation
  • Mortality
  • Epidemiology
  • Complications
Research works
28k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+25%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.1k and 520 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.1k works
  2. 2 China 520 works
  3. 3 India 380 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 268 works
  5. 5 Germany 257 works
  6. 6 Japan 228 works
  7. 7 Türkiye 162 works
  8. 8 Russia 155 works
  9. 9 Italy 152 works
  10. 10 France 126 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 32.7%China: 15.6%India: 11.4%United Kingdom: 8.0%6 others listed: 32.3%33%largest
United States1,092 · 32.7%China520 · 15.6%India380 · 11.4%United Kingdom268 · 8.0%6 others listed1,079 · 32.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Ain Shams University publishes the most Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries research, followed by All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Ain Shams UniversityEgypt 20 works
  2. 2 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 20 works
  3. 3 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 16 works
  4. 4 Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 12 works
  5. 5 Cairo UniversityEgypt 12 works
  6. 6 Massachusetts General HospitalUnited States 12 works
  7. 7 Cleveland ClinicUnited States 11 works
  8. 8 University of WashingtonUnited States 11 works
  9. 9 Chinese PLA General HospitalChina 11 works
  10. 10 University of Colorado DenverUnited States 11 works

Where is Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries research done?

The largest centres of Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia), London (United Kingdom) and New York (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cleveland.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 75 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 63 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 63 works
  4. 4 New York United States 60 works
  5. 5 Istanbul Türkiye 50 works
  6. 6 Seoul South Korea 46 works
  7. 7 Tokyo Japan 45 works
  8. 8 Shanghai China 45 works
  9. 9 New Delhi India 38 works
  10. 10 Boston United States 37 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ClevelandUS · 30.1 works4.3×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries than the world average.

See Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries on the map

Where is the best place to study Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Colorado Denver, Ain Shams University and Institute of Medical Sciences score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 10.54%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Colorado Denver: 11, 25.9%Ain Shams University: 20, 3.6%Institute of Medical Sciences: 12, 6.4%All India Institute of Medical Sciences: 20, 4.9%Peking University: 10, 26.7%Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi: 16, 3.0%University of Southern California: 10, 17.0%Zagazig University: 10, 2.7%The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston: 9, 7.4%University of Maryland, Baltimore: 10, 7.8%University of Colora…Institute of Medical…All India Institute …Ain Shams University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of Colorado DenverUnited States 55.825.9%6.9×11 +0.8%
2 Ain Shams UniversityEgypt 53.83.6%5.8×20 +419.9%
3 Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 50.26.4%7.9×12 +333.8%
4 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 46.74.9%6.7×20 +68.9%
5 Peking UniversityChina 46.426.7%1.4×10 +70.4%
6 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 42.73.0%6.0×16 —
7 University of Southern CaliforniaUnited States 39.417.0%3.0×10 +79.1%
8 Zagazig UniversityEgypt 36.62.7%5.6×10 +145.6%
9 The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonUnited States 36.67.4%6.2×9 +134.0%
10 University of Maryland, BaltimoreUnited States 35.57.8%6.8×10 +19.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 25% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.