Japan vs North Korea
On research quality in 2022-now, Japan ranks #16 in the world and North Korea #183, of 189 countries. Japan stands higher in 26 of the 26 fields both publish in, North Korea in 0.
Research profiles alike: 0.56similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Japan
- World rank, 2022-now
- #16
- #17 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 558k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.0%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 42%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Condensed Matter Physics, Structural Biology, Gastroenterology.
North Korea
- World rank, 2022-now
- #183
- #191 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 841
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 4.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 54%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Condensed Matter Physics, Geometry and Topology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Japan leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, output, top-10% rate, citations per work and institutions in the world top 100. North Korea leads on 4 of 9 measures: citation excellence for its fields, open access, international co-authorship and growth.
- #16Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#183
- 0.64×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.81×
- 558kOutputfractional works, 2022-now841
- 6.0%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited4.4%
- 17.2Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.1
- 1World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 42%Open accessof its works free to read, all time54%
- 12%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time48%
- -5%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+168%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Japan stands higher in 26 of 26 fields, North Korea in 0. Japan leads most in Engineering (#16 against #120). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #16Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- #22Arts and Humanities-
- #13Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-
- #26Business, Management and Accounting-
- #13Chemical Engineering-
- #14Chemistry-
- #16Computer Science-
- #25Decision Sciences-
- #12Dentistry-
- #15Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #17Economics, Econometrics and Finance-
- #21Energy-
- #16Engineering#120
- #20Environmental Science-
- #22Health Professions-
- #15Immunology and Microbiology-
- #12Materials Science-
- #14Mathematics-
- #18Medicine-
- #16Neuroscience-
- #18Nursing-
- #13Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #10Physics and Astronomy-
- #23Psychology-
- #26Social Sciences-
- #17Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Japan rank | North Korea rank | Japan top 10% | North Korea top 10% | Japan works | North Korea works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #16 | - | 6.4% | - | 16k | - |
| Arts and Humanities | #22 | - | 9.5% | - | 5.2k | - |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #13 | - | 5.5% | - | 41k | - |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #26 | - | 6.2% | - | 5.2k | - |
| Chemical Engineering | #13 | - | 4.8% | - | 2.5k | - |
| Chemistry | #14 | - | 4.8% | - | 12k | - |
| Computer Science | #16 | - | 5.1% | - | 37k | - |
| Decision Sciences | #25 | - | 5.7% | - | 2.9k | - |
| Dentistry | #12 | - | 7.7% | - | 2.9k | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #15 | - | 6.7% | - | 8.7k | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #17 | - | 7.4% | - | 6.1k | - |
| Energy | #21 | - | 6.9% | - | 3.6k | - |
| Engineering | #16 | #120 | 4.6% | 3.1% | 94k | 262 |
| Environmental Science | #20 | - | 6.0% | - | 21k | - |
| Health Professions | #22 | - | 6.9% | - | 8.9k | - |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #15 | - | 6.3% | - | 7k | - |
| Materials Science | #12 | - | 4.9% | - | 27k | - |
| Mathematics | #14 | - | 6.3% | - | 6.9k | - |
| Medicine | #18 | - | 6.6% | - | 167k | - |
| Neuroscience | #16 | - | 5.2% | - | 14k | - |
| Nursing | #18 | - | 5.6% | - | 2.8k | - |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #13 | - | 6.5% | - | 2.6k | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #10 | - | 7.4% | - | 22k | - |
| Psychology | #23 | - | 6.2% | - | 14k | - |
| Social Sciences | #26 | - | 7.1% | - | 27k | - |
| Veterinary | #17 | - | 5.0% | - | 773 | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Japan
- Adjuvant Therapy
- Molecular Characterization
- Echocardiography
- Surgery
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Heart Failure
- Aging
- Clinical Trials
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Surgical Management
- Mechanical Properties
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Neural Networks
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Nanoparticles
- Cancer
- Chemotherapy
- Oxidative Stress
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Treatment
- Climate Change
- Quality of Life
- Diagnosis
- Biomedical Applications
- Immunotherapy
- Risk Factors
- Management
- Prognostic Factors
- Neurological Disorders
- Genetic Mutations
- Guidelines
- Complications
- Radiotherapy
- Prognosis
- Survival Analysis
- Modernization
- Endoscopic Resection
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology32k▲ 1.28×140 topics
- Inflammation21k▲ 1.54×83 topics
- Deep Learning18k▼ 0.85×85 topics
- Machine Learning14k▼ 0.67×97 topics
- Treatment12k▲ 1.59×52 topics
- Oxidative Stress12k◆ 1.15×63 topics
- Climate Change12k▼ 0.69×132 topics
- Chemotherapy11k▲ 2.6×25 topics
- Quality of Life11k▲ 1.17×61 topics
- Cancer11k▲ 1.24×59 topics
- Diagnosis10k▲ 1.78×41 topics
- Nanoparticles9,087◆ 1.14×44 topics
- Biomedical Applications8,930▲ 1.20×36 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease8,839▲ 1.23×39 topics
- Immunotherapy8,823▲ 1.94×19 topics
- Neural Networks8,643◆ 0.89×42 topics
- Risk Factors8,023▲ 1.16×37 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines7,936▲ 2.3×14 topics
- Management7,655▲ 1.52×40 topics
- Mechanical Properties6,915◆ 1.12×39 topics
- Prognostic Factors6,756▲ 2.5×14 topics
- Surgical Management6,288▲ 2.4×20 topics
- Neurological Disorders5,916▲ 1.64×20 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment5,642▲ 1.98×8 topics
- Genetic Mutations5,620▲ 2.0×23 topics
- Clinical Trials5,573▲ 1.32×19 topics
- Guidelines5,493▲ 1.84×13 topics
- Aging5,443▲ 1.58×19 topics
- Complications5,433▲ 1.73×17 topics
- Heart Failure5,273▲ 1.87×14 topics
- Radiotherapy5,136▲ 2.1×13 topics
- Neoadjuvant Therapy4,824▲ 3.2×5 topics
- Prognosis4,800▲ 2.3×9 topics
- Surgery4,267▲ 1.94×12 topics
- Survival Analysis4,083▲ 2.4×7 topics
- Echocardiography4,000▲ 2.3×8 topics
- Modernization3,683▲ 3.2×5 topics
- Molecular Characterization3,645▲ 3.3×6 topics
- Endoscopic Resection3,093▲ 4.9×2 topics
- Adjuvant Therapy3,069▲ 3.9×2 topics
North Korea
- Hydrometallurgical Processes
- Functionally Graded Materials
- Optical Modulators
- Metamaterials
- Superconductivity
- Materials
- Molecular Dynamics
- Finite Element Method
- Buckling Behavior
- Numerical Simulation
- Biosensors
- Nonlinear Systems
- Vibration Analysis
- Remote Sensing
- Oxidative Stress
- Nanocomposites
- Environmental Impact
- Biomedical Applications
- Neural Networks
- Deep Learning
- Machine Learning
- Climate Change
- Mechanical Properties
- Nanoparticles
- Nanomaterials
- Renewable Energy
- Energy Efficiency
- Graphene
- Catalysis
- Microstructure
- Metal Recovery
- Artificial Neural Networks
- Nonlinear Dynamics
- Stability Analysis
- Fluid-Structure Interaction
- Rare Earth Elements
- Entanglement
- Microstructural Evolution
- Composite Plates
- Battery Recycling
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning45▲ 1.25×70 topics
- Deep Learning42◆ 1.15×65 topics
- Climate Change30◆ 1.02×66 topics
- Neural Networks30▲ 1.77×33 topics
- Mechanical Properties24▲ 2.3×28 topics
- Biomedical Applications24▲ 1.86×30 topics
- Nanoparticles23▲ 1.72×37 topics
- Environmental Impact20◆ 1.10×38 topics
- Nanomaterials20▲ 1.78×17 topics
- Nanocomposites20▲ 2.3×21 topics
- Renewable Energy19▲ 1.24×31 topics
- Oxidative Stress18◆ 1.05×47 topics
- Energy Efficiency18▲ 1.76×22 topics
- Remote Sensing17▲ 1.32×31 topics
- Graphene16▲ 2.3×11 topics
- Vibration Analysis15▲ 5.3×9 topics
- Catalysis15▲ 2.1×22 topics
- Nonlinear Systems14▲ 6.1×8 topics
- Microstructure13▲ 2.3×19 topics
- Biosensors12▲ 2.4×11 topics
- Metal Recovery12▲ 5.5×3 topics
- Numerical Simulation11▲ 3.6×12 topics
- Artificial Neural Networks11▲ 2.2×9 topics
- Buckling Behavior11▲ 14×2 topics
- Nonlinear Dynamics10▲ 4.4×6 topics
- Finite Element Method10▲ 9.8×6 topics
- Stability Analysis10▲ 5.7×6 topics
- Molecular Dynamics9▲ 4.8×7 topics
- Fluid-Structure Interaction9▲ 5.6×6 topics
- Materials9▲ 3.5×6 topics
- Rare Earth Elements8▲ 5.1×4 topics
- Superconductivity8▲ 4.4×9 topics
- Entanglement8▲ 4.9×4 topics
- Metamaterials8▲ 4.9×5 topics
- Microstructural Evolution8▲ 4.8×4 topics
- Optical Modulators7▲ 4.8×3 topics
- Composite Plates7▲ 21×1 topic
- Functionally Graded Materials7▲ 21×1 topic
- Battery Recycling6▲ 7.2×1 topic
- Hydrometallurgical Processes6▲ 7.2×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Japan has out-published North Korea every year since 1981.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 1In the top 1000
- 8In the top 5000
- 16In the top 1,0000
- #13Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Japan or North Korea?
Japan publishes 663.2× as much research as North Korea in 2022-now (558k against 841 fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Japan or North Korea?
6.0% of Japan's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 4.4% for North Korea.
Is Japan or North Korea growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +168% against 2018-21 for North Korea, and -5% for Japan.
Which has more open access research, Japan or North Korea?
54% of North Korea's research is free to read, against 42% of Japan's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Japan or North Korea?
Japan holds 1 of the world's top 100 research institutions and North Korea 0; in the top 1,000 it is 16 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Japan
- 1The University of Tokyo8.1% top 10% · 26k works
- 2Kyoto University7.5% top 10% · 16k works
- 3RIKEN11.4% top 10% · 4.7k works
- 4The University of Osaka7.0% top 10% · 13k works
- 5Nagoya University6.8% top 10% · 10k works
- 6Tohoku University7.6% top 10% · 14k works
North Korea
- 1Kim Il-sung University2.5% top 10% · 173 works
- 2Kim Chaek University of Technology1.4% top 10% · 232 works
- 3Institute of Natural Science9.3% top 10% · 287 works
- 4Pyongyang University of Science and Technology1.7% top 10% · 104 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Japan
- 1 Md. Rabiul Awual #6 worldwide 41k citations · 208 works
- 2 Ayyoob Sharifi #295 worldwide 23k citations · 468 works
- 3 A. S. Bell #544 worldwide 76k citations · 479 works
- 4 Noboru Mizushima #728 worldwide 143k citations · 420 works
- 5 Haoshen S. Zhou #1,003 worldwide 71k citations · 809 works
North Korea
- 1 Un-Gi Jong #589,064 worldwide 2k citations · 71 works
- 2 Yun-Hyok Kye #951,780 worldwide 1.1k citations · 38 works
- 3 Chol‐Jun Yu #1,569,436 worldwide 2.7k citations · 144 works
- 4 Sunghyok Kim #1,881,333 worldwide 656 citations · 15 works
- 5 O Hyong-Chol #2,399,720 worldwide 182 citations · 44 works