Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH
In research, Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH stands highest in Health Sciences (#6,524 of 11,982 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Health Professions — Health Professions is 6.7× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #13,943 of 28,054 · #18,942 all time
- Rank in Austria
- #74 of 168
- Research works
- 319 ▲ 56% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 5.1k 16.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 28.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 63% world 28%
What is Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #6,524 of 11,982 | 26.1% | 74 | #7403 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Health Professions takes 6.7× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Health ProfessionsField · 20.3 works6.7×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 6.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 6.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.3×
- Medicine 2.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.3×
- Psychology 1.7×
- Nursing 1.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.9×
- Decision Sciences 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Veterinary 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Social Sciences 0.3×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH?
Ranked on the composite score, R Winkler, Claudia Wild and Petra Schnell‐Inderst lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH.
- 1 R Winkler Austria · #456,847 worldwide 22 citations · 23 works
- 2 Claudia Wild Austria · #980,781 worldwide 40 citations · 60 works
- 3 Petra Schnell‐Inderst Austria · #982,715 worldwide 27 citations · 23 works
- 4 Ingrid Zechmeister‐Koss Austria · #1,362,380 worldwide 14 citations · 42 works
- 5 B. Piso Austria · #1,551,755 worldwide 2 citations · 21 works
- 6 A. Nachtnebel Austria · #1,553,886 worldwide 3 citations · 28 works
- 7 Gregor Goetz Austria · #1,587,746 worldwide 0 citations · 26 works
Which keywords describe research at Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Health, Chronic Disease Management, Behavior Change, Patient Engagement, Mobile Health, Adherence, Quality of Life and Primary Care.
- Health Information Exchange
- Physical Fitness
- Health Benefits
- Drug Development Costs
- Quality Improvement
- Critical Care
- Pharmaceutical Industry
- Coronary Heart Disease
- Adolescents
- Health Care
- Heart Failure
- mHealth
- Text Messaging
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Anxiety
- Primary Care
- Mobile Health
- Patient Engagement
- Epidemiology
- Chronic Disease Management
- Public Health
- Quality of Life
- Behavior Change
- Depression
- Adherence
- Chronic Diseases
- Meta-Analysis
- Health Utility Measures
- Health Apps
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Electronic Health Records
- Myocardial Infarction
- Cardiac Rehabilitation
- Healthcare Utilization
- Precision Medicine
- Medication Errors
- Telemedicine
- Generic Drugs
- Data Collection
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Public Health9▲ 5.5×13 topics
- Chronic Disease Management7▲ 31×5 topics
- Quality of Life7▲ 4.1×15 topics
- Epidemiology6▲ 1.38×30 topics
- Behavior Change6▲ 34×4 topics
- Patient Engagement6▲ 37×4 topics
- Depression5▲ 5.3×8 topics
- Mobile Health5▲ 34×3 topics
- Adherence5▲ 39×2 topics
- Primary Care5▲ 12×8 topics
- Chronic Diseases5▲ 17×5 topics
- Anxiety4▲ 8.1×5 topics
- Meta-Analysis4▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis4▲ 41×1 topic
- Health Utility Measures4▲ 41×1 topic
- Text Messaging4▲ 46×2 topics
- Health Apps4▲ 60×1 topic
- mHealth4▲ 60×1 topic
- Cardiovascular Disease4▲ 3.0×16 topics
- Heart Failure3▲ 6.4×6 topics
- Electronic Health Records3▲ 27×2 topics
- Health Care3▲ 25×2 topics
- Myocardial Infarction3▲ 11×2 topics
- Adolescents3▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Cardiac Rehabilitation3▲ 60×1 topic
- Coronary Heart Disease3▲ 60×1 topic
- Healthcare Utilization3▲ 30×2 topics
- Pharmaceutical Industry3▲ 63×2 topics
- Precision Medicine3▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Critical Care3▲ 9.7×6 topics
- Medication Errors3▲ 49×2 topics
- Quality Improvement2▲ 11×7 topics
- Telemedicine2▲ 17×4 topics
- Drug Development Costs2▲ 79×1 topic
- Generic Drugs2▲ 79×1 topic
- Health Benefits2▲ 6.4×4 topics
- Data Collection2▲ 70×2 topics
- Physical Fitness2▲ 14×2 topics
- Clinical Decision Support Systems2▲ 84×1 topic
- Health Information Exchange2▲ 84×1 topic
Which research topics does Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Cardiac Health and Mental Health and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 4 works
- 2 Mobile Health and mHealth Applications General Health Professions 4 works
- 3 Cardiac Health and Mental Health Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3 works
- 4 Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 5 Physical Activity and Health Physiology 2 works
- 6 Electronic Health Records Systems Health Information Management 2 works
- 7 Health and Medical Studies General Health Professions 2 works
- 8 Obesity and Health Practices Pharmacy 2 works
- 9 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 10 Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 56% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Vienna
- University of Vienna
- TU Wien
- Medical University of Vienna
- BOKU University
- Vienna University of Economics and Business
- Austrian Academy of Sciences
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
- Austrian Institute of Technology
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.