Children's Cancer Institute Australia
In research, Children's Cancer Institute Australia stands highest in Life Sciences (#7,320 of 14,347 worldwide), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (#4,630 of 7,814 worldwide) and Medicine (#11,048 of 17,978 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology — Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology is 7.7× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #17,189 of 28,054 · #15,695 all time
- Rank in Australia
- #278 of 391
- Research works
- 477 ▼ 24% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 20k 41.6 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 19.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 42% world 28%
What is Children's Cancer Institute Australia known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life SciencesDomain | #7,320 of 14,347 | 20.5% | 221 | |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField | #4,630 of 7,814 | 21.3% | 195 | |
| MedicineField | #11,048 of 17,978 | 25.2% | 217 | |
| Molecular BiologySubfield | #3,312 of 4,961 | 21.2% | 127 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #14,086 of 20,462 | 26.2% | 225 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Children's Cancer Institute Australia sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Children's Cancer Institute Australia specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology takes 7.7× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField · 25.2 works7.7×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 7.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.5×
- Medicine 2.3×
- Nursing 1.5×
- Neuroscience 1.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.7×
- Chemistry 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Health Professions 0.4×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Psychology 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
- Social Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Children's Cancer Institute Australia?
Ranked on the composite score, Richard B. Lock, Rosemary Sutton and Karen L. MacKenzie lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Children's Cancer Institute Australia.
- 1 Richard B. Lock Australia · #271,934 worldwide 221 citations · 71 works
- 2 Rosemary Sutton Australia · #496,733 worldwide 53 citations · 29 works
- 3 Karen L. MacKenzie Australia · #524,801 worldwide 67 citations · 16 works
- 4 Murray D. Norris Australia · #604,970 worldwide 72 citations · 45 works
- 5 Maria Kavallaris Australia · #628,319 worldwide 97 citations · 49 works
- 6 Tao Liu Australia · #641,958 worldwide 205 citations · 90 works
- 7 Jamie I. Fletcher Australia · #700,984 worldwide 24 citations · 17 works
- 8 Michelle Haber Australia · #704,569 worldwide 106 citations · 64 works
- 9 Belamy B. Cheung Australia · #1,026,739 worldwide 19 citations · 20 works
- 10 Jayne Murray Australia · #1,098,840 worldwide 27 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at Children's Cancer Institute Australia?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Immunotherapy, Prognostic Factors, Genetic Mutations, Cancer Therapy, Therapy, Staging System, ALK and Neuroblastoma.
- Arginine Deprivation
- Transcriptional Regulation
- Warburg Effect
- Epigenetic Regulation
- Cell Death
- Health-related Quality of Life
- m6A-seq
- Gene Expression
- Childhood Cancer
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Tumor Regression
- Gene Therapy
- Cancer Genomics
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Temozolomide
- Radiotherapy
- ALK
- Therapy
- Genetic Mutations
- Prognostic Factors
- Immunotherapy
- Cancer
- Cancer Therapy
- Staging System
- Neuroblastoma
- Glioblastoma
- Targeted Therapy
- Genomic Instability
- Mutational Signatures
- Minimal Residual Disease
- Tumor Targeting
- Cancer Progression
- Clinical Trials
- RNA methylation
- Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
- Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
- Chemotherapy
- HIF-1
- Genetic Variants
- Cancer Immunotherapy
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Immunotherapy11▲ 25×10 topics
- Prognostic Factors5▲ 18×10 topics
- Cancer4▲ 5.3×25 topics
- Genetic Mutations4▲ 16×10 topics
- Cancer Therapy4▲ 12×11 topics
- Therapy4▲ 33×4 topics
- Staging System4▲ 104×2 topics
- ALK4▲ 242×1 topic
- Neuroblastoma4▲ 242×1 topic
- Radiotherapy4▲ 16×3 topics
- Glioblastoma4▲ 90×1 topic
- Temozolomide4▲ 90×1 topic
- Targeted Therapy4▲ 27×4 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment3▲ 12×7 topics
- Genomic Instability3▲ 44×2 topics
- Cancer Genomics3▲ 63×1 topic
- Mutational Signatures3▲ 63×1 topic
- Gene Therapy3▲ 22×4 topics
- Minimal Residual Disease2▲ 54×2 topics
- Tumor Regression2▲ 33×2 topics
- Tumor Targeting2▲ 21×3 topics
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia2▲ 108×1 topic
- Cancer Progression2▲ 20×4 topics
- Childhood Cancer2▲ 108×1 topic
- Clinical Trials2▲ 5.2×10 topics
- Gene Expression2▲ 6.0×8 topics
- RNA methylation2▲ 36×1 topic
- m6A-seq2▲ 36×1 topic
- Childhood Cancer Survivor Study2▲ 68×1 topic
- Health-related Quality of Life2▲ 13×2 topics
- Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory2▲ 68×1 topic
- Cell Death2▲ 13×5 topics
- Chemotherapy2▲ 4.3×10 topics
- Epigenetic Regulation2▲ 13×5 topics
- HIF-12▲ 49×1 topic
- Warburg Effect2▲ 49×1 topic
- Genetic Variants2▲ 14×3 topics
- Transcriptional Regulation2▲ 15×6 topics
- Cancer Immunotherapy1▲ 14×3 topics
- Arginine Deprivation1▲ 60×1 topic
Which research topics does Children's Cancer Institute Australia publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments, Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments Neurology 4 works
- 2 Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment Genetics 4 works
- 3 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Research 3 works
- 4 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 5 RNA modifications and cancer Molecular Biology 2 works
- 6 Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2 works
- 7 Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism Cancer Research 2 works
- 8 Cancer Research and Treatments Biotechnology 1 works
- 9 Genomics and Rare Diseases Genetics 1 works
- 10 Protein Degradation and Inhibitors Molecular Biology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Children's Cancer Institute Australia's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 24% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Randwick
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.