Collaborative Research Group
In research, Collaborative Research Group stands highest in Health Sciences (#4,649 of 16,688 worldwide), Medicine (#4,403 of 14,558 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#14,132 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #16,427 of 22,385 · #9,344 all time
- Rank in Australia
- #179 of 270
- Research works
- 513 ▼ 5% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 12k 22.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.9% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.02× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 51% world 40%
- International
- 58% world 18%
What is Collaborative Research Group known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #4,649 of 16,688 | 18.2% | 205 | |
| MedicineField | #4,403 of 14,558 | 19.5% | 175 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #14,132 of 17,446 | 7.3% | 151 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Collaborative Research Group sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Collaborative Research Group work in?
In 2022-now, 52% of research at Collaborative Research Group is in Health Sciences, 21% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (42%), Social Sciences (12%), Health Professions (6%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences5451.6%
- Medicine4442.2%
- Health Professions76.4%
- Dentistry21.5%
- Nursing11.0%
- Veterinary10.5%
- Social Sciences2221.3%
- Life Sciences1514.2%
- Physical Sciences1312.9%
- Engineering65.7%
- Computer Science43.8%
- Environmental Science21.5%
- Chemistry10.6%
- Materials Science00.4%
- Mathematics00.4%
- Chemical Engineering00.2%
- Energy00.2%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 3.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Veterinary3.78×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology3.10×3 works
- Dentistry3.01×2 works
- Health Professions2.42×7 works
- Medicine2.20×44 works
- Nursing2.13×1 works
- Psychology1.69×5 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.36×0 works
- Neuroscience1.21×2 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.15×6 works
- Decision Sciences1.08×1 works
- Social Sciences0.94×12 works
- Chemical Engineering0.61×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.58×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.53×3 works
- Computer Science0.49×4 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.47×2 works
- Engineering0.38×6 works
- Chemistry0.35×1 works
- Mathematics0.33×0 works
- Environmental Science0.30×2 works
- Energy0.17×0 works
- Arts and Humanities0.15×0 works
- Materials Science0.12×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.06×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.03×0 works
- Veterinary 3.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology 3.1×
- Dentistry 3.0×
- Health Professions 2.4×
- Medicine 2.2×
- Nursing 2.1×
- Psychology 1.7×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.4×
- Neuroscience 1.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.1×
- Decision Sciences 1.1×
- Social Sciences 0.9×
- Chemical Engineering 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Energy 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Collaborative Research Group?
Ranked on the quality score, David H. Tian, Su C. Ang and Stine Munkholm-Larsen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Collaborative Research Group.
- 1
David H. Tian
Australia · #258,255 worldwide 6k citations · 165 works
- 2
Su C. Ang
Australia · #1,358,483 worldwide 1k citations · 23 works
- 3
Stine Munkholm-Larsen
Australia · #1,396,291 worldwide 726 citations · 21 works
- 4
Yi-Chin Tsai
Australia · #2,050,994 worldwide 576 citations · 18 works
- 5
Ashley R. Wilson‐Smith
Australia · #2,587,749 worldwide 678 citations · 45 works
- 6
Laurent Wicht
Australia · #3,246,012 worldwide 27 citations · 28 works
- 7
Nathan Scott Brown
Australia · #3,338,923 worldwide 0 citations · 24 works
- 8
Shane Leaning
Australia · #3,548,568 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 9
Aditya Eranki
Australia · #4,456,195 worldwide 382 citations · 39 works
- 10
佳奈 下田
Australia · #4,985,861 worldwide 0 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Collaborative Research Group?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Social Determinants of Health, Alzheimer's Disease, Healthcare Access, Neuroimaging, Inflammation, Gender Equality and Dementia.
- Integrated Care
- Vaccine Hesitancy
- COVID-19 Vaccine
- Myocardial Infarction
- Global Access
- Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Caregiver Burden
- Critical Care
- Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement
- Endovascular Repair
- Poverty Alleviation
- Echocardiography
- Inequality
- Primary Care
- Gender Equality
- Healthcare Access
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Social Determinants of Health
- Public Health
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Mental Health
- Aging
- Neuroimaging
- Guidelines
- Dementia
- Community Development
- Family Support Policies
- Public Policy
- Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement
- Cognitive Decline
- Heart Failure
- Ethical Considerations
- Vascular Risk Factors
- Health Behavior
- Aortic Aneurysm
- Citizenship
- Inflammatory Response
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology8▲ 1.93×53 topics
- Inflammation4▲ 1.91×30 topics
- Risk Factors3▲ 2.7×21 topics
- Public Health3▲ 1.96×23 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease3▲ 2.3×21 topics
- Social Determinants of Health3▲ 12×5 topics
- Mental Health2▲ 1.62×18 topics
- Alzheimer's Disease2▲ 8.0×4 topics
- Aging2▲ 3.9×7 topics
- Healthcare Access2▲ 7.5×2 topics
- Neuroimaging2▲ 7.5×3 topics
- Gender Equality2▲ 6.9×3 topics
- Guidelines2▲ 4.0×8 topics
- Primary Care2▲ 5.2×7 topics
- Dementia2▲ 19×2 topics
- Inequality2▲ 7.8×2 topics
- Community Development2▲ 9.5×2 topics
- Echocardiography2▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Family Support Policies2▲ 112×1 topic
- Poverty Alleviation2▲ 18×2 topics
- Public Policy2▲ 3.5×1 topic
- Endovascular Repair2▲ 19×2 topics
- Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement2▲ 23×1 topic
- Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement2▲ 23×1 topic
- Cognitive Decline2▲ 13×2 topics
- Critical Care2▲ 6.1×7 topics
- Heart Failure2▲ 3.5×9 topics
- Caregiver Burden2▲ 12×2 topics
- Ethical Considerations1▲ 4.0×7 topics
- Mild Cognitive Impairment1▲ 16×1 topic
- Vascular Risk Factors1▲ 16×1 topic
- Global Access1▲ 14×2 topics
- Health Behavior1▲ 13×3 topics
- Myocardial Infarction1▲ 5.2×6 topics
- Aortic Aneurysm1▲ 17×2 topics
- COVID-19 Vaccine1▲ 16×1 topic
- Citizenship1▲ 9.9×2 topics
- Vaccine Hesitancy1▲ 18×1 topic
- Inflammatory Response1▲ 14×3 topics
- Integrated Care1▲ 24×2 topics
Which research topics does Collaborative Research Group publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Social Policies and Family, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 2 Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2 works
- 3 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
- 4 Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Health 1 works
- 5 Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
- 6 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 1 works
- 7 Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques Surgery 1 works
- 8 Immune Cell Function and Interaction Immunology 1 works
- 9 Aortic aneurysm repair treatments Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
- 10 Interprofessional Education and Collaboration General Health Professions 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Collaborative Research Group's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 5% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Collaborative Research Group as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00025% in 2024.
Fractional works of Collaborative Research Group over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 33.7% in 2013.
Other research institutions in Sydney
- The University of Sydney
- UNSW Sydney
- Macquarie University
- University of Technology Sydney
- Prince of Wales Hospital
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
- Sax Institute
- The George Institute for Global Health
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Collaborative Research Group. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
