Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Shiraz · Iran

Dr. Daneshbod Labratory

Research works
72
▲ 9% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.2k
16.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
38%
world 40%
International
15%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Dr. Daneshbod Labratory is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Dr. Daneshbod Labratory work in?

In all years, 70% of research at Dr. Daneshbod Labratory is in Health Sciences, 17% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (66%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (9%), Immunology and Microbiology (4%). It does 2.7× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 51 fractional works · 70.4% of its workMedicine: 48 fractional works · 66.0% of its workSurgery: 9 fractional works · 12.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 4 fractional works · 5.7% of its workOncology: 4 fractional works · 4.9% of its workEpidemiology: 3 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 3 fractional works · 3.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workRheumatology: 2 fractional works · 2.9% of its workHematology: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workDermatology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workReproductive Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workRehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workUrology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOphthalmology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmall Animals: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLife Sciences: 12 fractional works · 16.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 6 fractional works · 9.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 4.0% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workCancer Research: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 3 fractional works · 4.2% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workParasitology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 8.9% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 3.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workBiomaterials: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBioengineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKDr. DaneshbodLabratory72fractional works, all years
Life Sciences17%Physical Sciences9%Health Sciences70%Social Sciences4%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine4866.0%
    2. Dentistry11.8%
    3. Health Professions11.2%
    4. Veterinary10.9%
    5. Nursing00.6%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology69.0%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology34.2%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.8%
    4. Neuroscience11.3%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.3%
    1. Engineering33.9%
    2. Materials Science12.0%
    3. Environmental Science11.0%
    4. Computer Science10.9%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.4%
    6. Energy00.2%
    7. Chemical Engineering00.2%
    8. Physics and Astronomy00.2%
    9. Chemistry00.1%
    1. Social Sciences22.3%
    2. Psychology11.2%
    3. Arts and Humanities00.5%
    4. Decision Sciences00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.81× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.17× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 5.23× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 2.00× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2.63× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Energy: 1.57× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.31× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceDentistry: 1.39× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.45× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.91× its world share, 7 worksMedicineNursing: 1.10× its world share, 0 worksNursingPsychology: 1.05× its world share, 0 worksPsychology1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Immunology and Microbiology, 5.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 14 fields, with their numbers
  1. Immunology and Microbiology5.23×1 works
  2. Medicine2.91×7 works
  3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.63×0 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.17×1 works
  5. Neuroscience2.00×0 works
  6. Energy1.57×0 works
  7. Health Professions1.45×0 works
  8. Dentistry1.39×0 works
  9. Materials Science1.31×1 works
  10. Nursing1.10×0 works
  11. Psychology1.05×0 works
  12. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.81×0 works
  13. Environmental Science0.27×0 works
  14. Engineering0.25×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Dr. Daneshbod Labratory?

Ranked on the quality score, Azita Aledavood, Yahya Daneshbod and Shahrzad Negahban lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Dr. Daneshbod Labratory.

  1. 1 Azita Aledavood Iran · #3,771,906 worldwide 290 citations · 19 works
  2. 2 Yahya Daneshbod Iran · #4,217,662 worldwide 3.8k citations · 198 works
  3. 3 Shahrzad Negahban Iran · #4,706,594 worldwide 428 citations · 37 works
  4. 4 Khosrow Daneshbod Iran · #5,245,399 worldwide 879 citations · 55 works
All ranked researchers at Dr. Daneshbod Labratory

What are the most cited papers from Dr. Daneshbod Labratory?

The most cited paper from Dr. Daneshbod Labratory is "A geometric approach to the synthesis of failure detection filters" (Mohammad-Ali Massoumnia, 1986), with 584 citations. Next come "Effect of Addition of Silymarin to Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Proteinuria in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial" (137) and "Dual spinneret electrospun nanofibrous/gel structure of chitosan-gelatin/chitosan-hyaluronic acid as a wound dressing: In-vitro and in-vivo studies" (111).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A geometric approach to the synthesis of failure detection filters Mohammad-Ali Massoumnia · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Sep 1986 584
2 Effect of Addition of Silymarin to Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Proteinuria in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Mohammad Kazem Fallahzadeh, Banafshe Dormanesh, Mohammad Mahdi Sagheb et al. · American Journal of Kidney Diseases 7 Jul 2012 137
3 Dual spinneret electrospun nanofibrous/gel structure of chitosan-gelatin/chitosan-hyaluronic acid as a wound dressing: In-vitro and in-vivo studies Abbas Zakeri Bazmandeh, Esmaeil Mirzaei, Milad Fadaie et al. · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 20 Jun 2020 111
4 Surgical Revascularization Is Associated With Maximal Survival in Patients With Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Anthony W. Castleberry, Judson B. Williams, Mani Ali Daneshmand et al. · Circulation Open access 18 Apr 2014 99
5 Comparison of Conventional, Molecular, and Immunohistochemical Methods in Diagnosis of Typical and Atypical Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Sadegh Shirian, Ahmad Oryan, Gholamreza Hatam et al. · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Open access 30 Jan 2014 83
All 58 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Dr. Daneshbod Labratory?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Treatment, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Drug Resistance and Vaccine Development.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology9▲ 3.1×34 topics
  2. Treatment6▲ 6.8×15 topics
  3. Diagnosis6▲ 7.8×14 topics
  4. Prognostic Factors5▲ 16×10 topics
  5. Inflammation5▲ 3.0×23 topics
  6. Chemotherapy4▲ 8.3×18 topics
  7. Radiotherapy4▲ 15×6 topics
  8. Drug Resistance4▲ 18×3 topics
  9. Vaccine Development4▲ 18×3 topics
  10. Immunity4▲ 15×3 topics
  11. Leishmaniasis3▲ 173×1 topic
  12. Parasite3▲ 153×1 topic
  13. Molecular Classification3▲ 27×2 topics
  14. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma3▲ 127×1 topic
  15. Salivary Gland Tumors3▲ 127×1 topic
  16. Surgical Management3▲ 8.2×5 topics
  17. Public Health3▲ 2.7×12 topics
  18. Immunotherapy2▲ 4.8×12 topics
  19. Thyroid Carcinoma2▲ 55×2 topics
  20. Clinical Practice Guidelines2▲ 4.7×6 topics
  21. Endoscopic Surgery2▲ 24×2 topics
  22. Biomarkers2▲ 4.1×7 topics
  23. Metastasis2▲ 7.2×6 topics
  24. Squamous Cell Carcinoma2▲ 26×3 topics
  25. Immunohistochemistry2▲ 23×3 topics
  26. Molecular Pathology2▲ 20×3 topics
  27. Ultrasound2▲ 19×2 topics
  28. Wound Healing2▲ 8.8×7 topics
  29. Diagnostic Algorithm1▲ 31×2 topics
  30. Gene Expression Profiling1▲ 20×2 topics
  31. Genomic Analysis1▲ 6.6×8 topics
  32. Lymphoma1▲ 13×2 topics
  33. Molecular Profiling1▲ 16×2 topics
  34. Regeneration1▲ 10×5 topics
  35. Regenerative Medicine1▲ 8.3×4 topics
  36. Staging System1▲ 29×2 topics
  37. Diagnosis Criteria1▲ 55×1 topic
  38. International Myeloma Working Group1▲ 55×1 topic
  39. Keratocystic Odontogenic Tumor1▲ 44×1 topic
  40. Odontogenic Tumors1▲ 44×1 topic

Which research topics does Dr. Daneshbod Labratory publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Wound Healing and Treatments, Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Sperm and Testicular Function and Reproductive Biology and Fertility.

  1. 1 Wound Healing and Treatments Rehabilitation 1 works
  2. 2 Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Oncology 0 works
  3. 3 Sperm and Testicular Function Reproductive Medicine 0 works
  4. 4 Reproductive Biology and Fertility Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  5. 5 Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis Molecular Biology 0 works
  6. 6 Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Clinical Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 0 works
  8. 8 Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders Immunology 0 works
  9. 9 Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence Physiology 0 works
  10. 10 Circadian rhythm and melatonin Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available37.9%not open62.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors15.1%domestic only84.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Dr. Daneshbod Labratory's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 9% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Dr. Daneshbod Labratory as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000078% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Dr. Daneshbod Labratory0.000046% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Dr. Daneshbod Labratory over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Shiraz

All research institutions in Shiraz

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Dr. Daneshbod Labratory. Posts are plain text and can be reported.