Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Albany · United States

Group for Organizational Effectiveness

groupoe.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
78
▼ 20% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.9k
62.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
15.3%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
23%
world 18%
Group for Organizational Effectiveness

Not ranked overall: Group for Organizational Effectiveness is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Group for Organizational Effectiveness work in?

In all years, 71% of research at Group for Organizational Effectiveness is in Social Sciences, 21% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Business, Management and Accounting (25%), Social Sciences (21%), Psychology (20%). It does 3.0× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 56 fractional works · 71.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 19 fractional works · 24.6% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 11 fractional works · 14.0% of its workStrategy and Management: 4 fractional works · 5.2% of its workManagement Information Systems: 2 fractional works · 2.9% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 16 fractional works · 20.5% of its workEducation: 6 fractional works · 7.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 4 fractional works · 4.7% of its workCommunication: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPublic Administration: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 15 fractional works · 19.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 7 fractional works · 8.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 5 fractional works · 6.3% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 4 fractional works · 4.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 3 fractional works · 3.4% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 17 fractional works · 21.1% of its workMedicine: 11 fractional works · 14.1% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPhysiology: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 5 fractional works · 5.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 6.7% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workArchitecture: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Materials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKGroup forOrganizational…78fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences7%Health Sciences21%Social Sciences71%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Business, Management and Accounting1924.6%
    2. Social Sciences1620.5%
    3. Psychology1519.6%
    4. Decision Sciences44.8%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance11.5%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.1%
    1. Medicine1114.1%
    2. Health Professions55.8%
    3. Nursing11.2%
    1. Computer Science22.7%
    2. Engineering22.1%
    3. Environmental Science11.2%
    4. Materials Science00.4%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.4%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.4%
    2. Neuroscience00.2%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Computer Science: 0.39× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 1.42× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 4.80× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.57× its world share, 2 worksMedicineNursing: 4.12× its world share, 0 worksNursingBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3.64× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 4.70× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.94× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.45× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.53× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions4.80×1 works
  2. Decision Sciences4.70×0 works
  3. Nursing4.12×0 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting3.64×1 works
  5. Psychology2.45×1 works
  6. Medicine1.57×2 works
  7. Social Sciences1.53×2 works
  8. Environmental Science1.42×1 works
  9. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.94×0 works
  10. Computer Science0.39×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Group for Organizational Effectiveness?

Ranked on the quality score, Scott I. Tannenbaum lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Group for Organizational Effectiveness.

  1. 1 Scott I. Tannenbaum United States · #38,330 worldwide 14k citations · 132 works
All ranked researchers at Group for Organizational Effectiveness

What are the most cited papers from Group for Organizational Effectiveness?

The most cited paper from Group for Organizational Effectiveness is "Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis." (Christopher P. Cerasoli, Jessica M. Nicklin, Michael T. Ford, 2014), with 1,982 citations. Next come "The Science of Training and Development in Organizations" (1,077) and "Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession" (964).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Christopher P. Cerasoli, Jessica M. Nicklin, Michael T. Ford · Psychological Bulletin 2014 1,982
2 The Science of Training and Development in Organizations Eduardo Salas, Scott I. Tannenbaum, Kurt Kraiger et al. · Gothic.net Open access Jun 2012 1,077
3 Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession Isabelle Le Breton‐Miller, Danny L. Miller, Lloyd Steier · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 14 May 2004 964
4 Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis Scott I. Tannenbaum, Christopher P. Cerasoli · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Review 4 Jun 2012 630
5 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Bradford S. Bell, Scott I. Tannenbaum, J. Kevin Ford et al. · Journal of Applied Psychology 2017 458
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Group for Organizational Effectiveness?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Leadership, Performance Improvement, Organizational Learning, Employee Development, Meta-Analysis, Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Culture and Training Motivation.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Leadership9▲ 34×12 topics
  2. Performance Improvement8▲ 314×3 topics
  3. Organizational Learning7▲ 98×3 topics
  4. Employee Development6▲ 334×2 topics
  5. Meta-Analysis5▲ 12×5 topics
  6. Knowledge Sharing4▲ 34×4 topics
  7. Organizational Culture4▲ 20×6 topics
  8. Training Motivation4▲ 404×1 topic
  9. Training Transfer4▲ 404×1 topic
  10. Change Management4▲ 157×3 topics
  11. Employee Engagement4▲ 49×4 topics
  12. Institutional Theory4▲ 58×2 topics
  13. Knowledge Management4▲ 9.8×6 topics
  14. Job Satisfaction3▲ 17×7 topics
  15. Organizational Performance3▲ 29×8 topics
  16. Organizational Change3▲ 49×3 topics
  17. Professionalism3▲ 30×2 topics
  18. Institutional Entrepreneurship3▲ 118×1 topic
  19. Reflective Practice3▲ 21×6 topics
  20. Sensemaking3▲ 118×1 topic
  21. Higher Education3▲ 9.4×7 topics
  22. Performance Measurement3▲ 18×4 topics
  23. Human Resource Management3▲ 37×2 topics
  24. Psychological Capital3▲ 46×2 topics
  25. Management3▲ 4.2×6 topics
  26. Supply Chain Management3▲ 6.3×6 topics
  27. Competitive Advantage2▲ 74×3 topics
  28. Dimensions of Learning2▲ 260×1 topic
  29. Learning Organization2▲ 221×1 topic
  30. Shared Mental Models2▲ 217×1 topic
  31. Team Processes2▲ 217×1 topic
  32. Student Engagement2▲ 11×5 topics
  33. Organizational Behavior2▲ 29×1 topic
  34. Work Engagement2▲ 46×1 topic
  35. Customer Satisfaction2▲ 16×3 topics
  36. Motivation2▲ 8.3×5 topics
  37. Professional Development2▲ 15×6 topics
  38. Strategic Management2▲ 24×3 topics
  39. Self-Regulation2▲ 14×4 topics
  40. Strategic Planning2▲ 26×3 topics

Which research topics does Group for Organizational Effectiveness publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Innovations in Medical Education, Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes, Business and Economic Development and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration.

Innovations in Medical E…1Innovations in Medical Education: 1 fractional worksPharmaceutical Practices…0Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes: 0 fractional worksBusiness and Economic De…0Business and Economic Development: 0 fractional worksInterprofessional Educat…0Interprofessional Education and Collaboration: 0 fractional worksSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices: 0 fractional worksEmployer Branding and e-HRM: 0 fractional worksImpact of AI and Big Dat…0Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society: 0 fractional worksTeam Dynamics and Perfor…0Team Dynamics and Performance: 0 fractional worksAI and HR Technologies0AI and HR Technologies: 0 fractional worksEvaluation of Teaching P…0Evaluation of Teaching Practices: 0 fractional works
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeriatrics and GerontologyManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawGeneral Health Professions5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Innovations in Medical Education Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
  2. 2 Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes Geriatrics and Gerontology 0 works
  3. 3 Business and Economic Development Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  4. 4 Interprofessional Education and Collaboration General Health Professions 0 works
  5. 5 Software Engineering Techniques and Practices Information Systems 0 works
  6. 6 Employer Branding and e-HRM Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
  7. 7 Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society Management Science and Operations Research 0 works
  8. 8 Team Dynamics and Performance Social Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 AI and HR Technologies Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
  10. 10 Evaluation of Teaching Practices Education 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available23.6%not open76.4%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.8%domestic only77.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Group for Organizational Effectiveness's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 20% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Group for Organizational Effectiveness as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000025% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Group for Organizational Effectiveness0.000043% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Group for Organizational Effectiveness over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Albany

All research institutions in Albany

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Group for Organizational Effectiveness. Posts are plain text and can be reported.