Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Burbank · United States

Los Angeles Clinical Trials

In research, Los Angeles Clinical Trials stands highest in Medicine (#6,531 of 14,558 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#7,576 of 16,688 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#22,306
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#4,649
of 7,310
Research works
220
▲ 61% vs 2018-21
Citations
8.1k
36.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.4%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.12×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
27%
world 40%
International
29%
world 18%

What is Los Angeles Clinical Trials known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
MedicineField #6,531 of 14,558 11.4%134
Health SciencesDomain #7,576 of 16,688 11.5%142

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Los Angeles Clinical Trials sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Los Angeles Clinical Trials work in?

In 2022-now, 68% of research at Los Angeles Clinical Trials is in Health Sciences, 18% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (63%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (10%), Health Professions (5%). It does 2.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 27 fractional works · 68.5% of its workMedicine: 25 fractional works · 63.1% of its workSurgery: 3 fractional works · 8.0% of its workNeurology: 3 fractional works · 6.5% of its workOncology: 3 fractional works · 6.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 5.2% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workRheumatology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 7 fractional works · 17.8% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 10.1% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 5.6% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workCancer Research: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 7.8% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.0% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workStatistics and Probability: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKLos AngelesClinical Trials40fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences18%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences68%Social Sciences8%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2563.1%
    2. Health Professions24.7%
    3. Veterinary00.6%
    4. Dentistry00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology410.1%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences13.1%
    3. Neuroscience13.1%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology11.3%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance24.2%
    2. Psychology12.3%
    3. Social Sciences00.7%
    4. Decision Sciences00.4%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    1. Mathematics13.5%
    2. Engineering00.9%
    3. Computer Science00.4%
    4. Environmental Science00.4%
    5. Materials Science00.4%
    6. Chemistry00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.65× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.90× its world share, 4 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.26× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.88× its world share, 1 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 2.96× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsDentistry: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.77× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.29× its world share, 25 worksMedicineVeterinary: 4.10× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.43× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.95× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.74× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 20 fields, with their numbers
  1. Veterinary4.10×0 works
  2. Medicine3.29×25 works
  3. Mathematics2.96×1 works
  4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.95×2 works
  5. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.90×4 works
  6. Neuroscience1.88×1 works
  7. Health Professions1.77×2 works
  8. Immunology and Microbiology1.26×0 works
  9. Psychology0.74×1 works
  10. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.66×0 works
  11. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.65×1 works
  12. Decision Sciences0.43×0 works
  13. Dentistry0.29×0 works
  14. Chemistry0.18×0 works
  15. Materials Science0.12×0 works
  16. Business, Management and Accounting0.09×0 works
  17. Environmental Science0.08×0 works
  18. Engineering0.06×0 works
  19. Computer Science0.05×0 works
  20. Social Sciences0.05×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Los Angeles Clinical Trials?

Ranked on the quality score, Mohamed Bidair, Mitchell A. Nides and Thomas M. Shiovitz lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Los Angeles Clinical Trials.

  1. 1 Mohamed Bidair United States · #276,764 worldwide 2.4k citations · 35 works
  2. 2 Mitchell A. Nides United States · #277,299 worldwide 5.8k citations · 53 works
  3. 3 Thomas M. Shiovitz United States · #1,122,411 worldwide 5.2k citations · 38 works
  4. 4 Mark T. Leibowitz United States · #1,134,757 worldwide 1.1k citations · 30 works
  5. 5 Mo Bidair United States · #1,206,699 worldwide 354 citations · 21 works
  6. 6 David Berz United States · #1,377,206 worldwide 1.9k citations · 133 works
  7. 7 Neal R. Cutler United States · #2,118,334 worldwide 9.3k citations · 228 works
  8. 8 Stanford S. Jhee United States · #2,669,703 worldwide 2.2k citations · 70 works
  9. 9 S. S. Jhee United States · #2,700,892 worldwide 486 citations · 15 works
  10. 10 Amy E. Veroff United States · #2,765,263 worldwide 794 citations · 37 works
All ranked researchers at Los Angeles Clinical Trials

What are the most cited papers from Los Angeles Clinical Trials?

The most cited paper from Los Angeles Clinical Trials is "Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease" (William J. Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan, Paul J. Rutgeerts et al., 2013), with 2,734 citations. Next come "A Controlled Trial of Sustained-Release Bupropion, a Nicotine Patch, or Both for Smoking Cessation" (1,609) and "Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review" (1,064).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease William J. Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan, Paul J. Rutgeerts et al. · New England Journal of Medicine Open access 21 Aug 2013 2,734
2 A Controlled Trial of Sustained-Release Bupropion, a Nicotine Patch, or Both for Smoking Cessation Douglas E. Jorenby, Scott James Leischow, Mitchell A. Nides et al. · New England Journal of Medicine Open access 4 Mar 1999 1,609
3 Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review David B. Fogel · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Open access 7 Aug 2018 1,064
4 Effects of Xanomeline, a Selective Muscarinic Receptor Agonist, on Cognitive Function and Behavioral Symptoms in Alzheimer Disease Neil C. Bodick, Walter Offen, Allan I. Levey et al. · Archives of Neurology Apr 1997 697
5 Efficacy and safety of rilonacept (interleukin‐1 trap) in patients with cryopyrin‐associated periodic syndromes: Results from two sequential placebo‐controlled studies Hal M. Hoffman, Martin L. Throne, N. Amar et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatism 30 Jul 2008 584
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Los Angeles Clinical Trials?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Neurodegeneration, Clinical Trials, Epidemiology, Biomarkers, FUS/TLS, TDP-43, Quality of Life and Genetics.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 17 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 17 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology4▲ 2.3×32 topics
  2. Quality of Life2▲ 4.2×13 topics
  3. Clinical Trials2▲ 8.2×10 topics
  4. Neurodegeneration2▲ 18×4 topics
  5. Biomarkers2▲ 7.3×7 topics
  6. FUS/TLS2▲ 192×1 topic
  7. Genetics2▲ 6.8×3 topics
  8. TDP-432▲ 192×1 topic
  9. Inflammation2▲ 2.0×21 topics
  10. Chemotherapy2▲ 5.5×10 topics
  11. Protein Aggregation2▲ 71×2 topics
  12. Adaptive Designs1▲ 154×1 topic
  13. Cost-effectiveness Analysis1▲ 42×1 topic
  14. False Discovery Rate1▲ 154×1 topic
  15. Health Utility Measures1▲ 42×1 topic
  16. Depression1▲ 3.2×8 topics
  17. Immunotherapy1▲ 3.9×10 topics

Which research topics does Los Angeles Clinical Trials publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding.

  1. 1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research Neurology 2 works
  2. 2 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  3. 3 Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistics and Probability 1 works
  4. 4 Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding Molecular Biology 1 works
  5. 5 Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1 works
  6. 6 HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research Oncology 1 works
  7. 7 Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  8. 8 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  9. 9 Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  10. 10 Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available26.6%not open73.4%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.6%domestic only71.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Los Angeles Clinical Trials's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 61% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Los Angeles Clinical Trials as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00013% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Los Angeles Clinical Trials0.00020% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Los Angeles Clinical Trials over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Burbank

All research institutions in Burbank

Share Los Angeles Clinical Trials's ranking

Los Angeles Clinical Trials on Science Explorer

A card with Los Angeles Clinical Trials's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Los Angeles Clinical Trials. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.