Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · St Louis · United States

Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy

aliperti.netROR OpenAlex
Research works
77
▲ 65% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.5k
20.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
32%
world 40%
International
20%
world 18%
Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy

Not ranked overall: Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy work in?

In all years, 57% of research at Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy is in Health Sciences, 23% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (49%), Engineering (14%), Health Professions (6%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 44 fractional works · 57.3% of its workMedicine: 37 fractional works · 48.7% of its workSurgery: 10 fractional works · 12.5% of its workOncology: 5 fractional works · 7.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 4 fractional works · 4.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workHematology: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workTransplantation: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNephrology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRheumatology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Professions: 5 fractional works · 6.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 4.6% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 18 fractional works · 23.0% of its workEngineering: 11 fractional works · 14.2% of its workMechanical Engineering: 4 fractional works · 4.7% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workMechanics of Materials: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 3 fractional works · 4.3% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMetals and Alloys: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Materials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workFluid Flow and Transfer Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 8 fractional works · 10.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workFinance: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 7 fractional works · 9.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 4.9% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 2 fractional works · 3.2% of its workImmunology: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKMidwestTherapeutic…77fractional works, all years
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences23%Health Sciences57%Social Sciences10%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine3748.7%
    2. Health Professions56.3%
    3. Dentistry11.7%
    4. Nursing00.6%
    5. Veterinary00.1%
    1. Engineering1114.2%
    2. Materials Science34.3%
    3. Environmental Science22.1%
    4. Computer Science11.3%
    5. Mathematics00.4%
    6. Chemistry00.3%
    7. Chemical Engineering00.2%
    8. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
    1. Social Sciences34.1%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.1%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting22.1%
    4. Psychology11.5%
    5. Decision Sciences00.4%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology44.9%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology23.2%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.0%
    4. Neuroscience00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.69× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.66× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceDentistry: 2.76× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.08× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.54× its world share, 8 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.71× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.98× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 3.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 14 fields, with their numbers
  1. Medicine3.54×8 works
  2. Dentistry2.76×0 works
  3. Immunology and Microbiology2.66×0 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting1.71×1 works
  5. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.69×1 works
  6. Health Professions1.08×0 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.98×0 works
  8. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.60×0 works
  9. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.30×0 works
  10. Environmental Science0.29×0 works
  11. Chemistry0.23×0 works
  12. Engineering0.22×0 works
  13. Neuroscience0.12×0 works
  14. Social Sciences0.07×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy?

Ranked on the quality score, Edward J. Gerber and Ralph Shapiro lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy.

  1. 1 Edward J. Gerber United States · #1,332,506 worldwide 1.1k citations · 27 works
  2. 2 Ralph Shapiro United States · #1,425,069 worldwide 5.3k citations · 150 works
All ranked researchers at Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy

What are the most cited papers from Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy?

The most cited paper from Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy is "Virus-Plus-Susceptibility Gene Interaction Determines Crohn's Disease Gene Atg16L1 Phenotypes in Intestine" (Ken Cadwell, Khushbu Patel, Nicole S. Maloney et al., 2010), with 910 citations. Next come "Immunodeficiency, autoinflammation and amylopectinosis in humans with inherited HOIL-1 and LUBAC deficiency" (486) and "Use and interpretation of diagnostic vaccination in primary immunodeficiency: A working group report of the Basic and Clinical Immunology Interest Section of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology" (455).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Virus-Plus-Susceptibility Gene Interaction Determines Crohn's Disease Gene Atg16L1 Phenotypes in Intestine Ken Cadwell, Khushbu Patel, Nicole S. Maloney et al. · Cell Open access Jun 2010 910
2 Immunodeficiency, autoinflammation and amylopectinosis in humans with inherited HOIL-1 and LUBAC deficiency Bertrand Boisson et al. · Nature Immunology Open access 28 Oct 2012 486
3 Use and interpretation of diagnostic vaccination in primary immunodeficiency: A working group report of the Basic and Clinical Immunology Interest Section of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Jordan Scott Orange, Mark C. Ballow, E. Richard Stiehm et al. · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 28 Aug 2012 455
4 Selective Subversion of Autophagy Complexes Facilitates Completion of the Brucella Intracellular Cycle Tregei Starr, Robert Child, Tara D. Wehrly et al. · Cell Host & Microbe Open access 2012 335
5 Effect of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Suspected Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction on Pain-Related Disability Following Cholecystectomy Peter B. Cotton et al. · JAMA Open access 27 May 2014 254
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Risk Factors, Genetic Mutations, Ethical Considerations, Epidemiology, Ethical Climate, Moral Distress, Quality of Life and Kidney Transplantation.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology6▲ 1.92×33 topics
  2. Risk Factors4▲ 5.2×8 topics
  3. Quality of Life4▲ 3.4×14 topics
  4. Ethical Considerations3▲ 13×5 topics
  5. Genetic Mutations3▲ 8.2×8 topics
  6. Ethical Climate3▲ 86×1 topic
  7. Moral Distress3▲ 86×1 topic
  8. Immunotherapy2▲ 4.8×9 topics
  9. Kidney Transplantation2▲ 44×2 topics
  10. Dynamic Response2▲ 42×2 topics
  11. Thrombosis2▲ 12×2 topics
  12. Chemotherapy2▲ 3.6×9 topics
  13. Graft Survival2▲ 26×3 topics
  14. Health Risks2▲ 83×2 topics
  15. Transplantation2▲ 23×2 topics
  16. Degenerative Disc Disease2▲ 28×2 topics
  17. Spinal Fusion2▲ 26×2 topics
  18. Vibration Analysis2▲ 7.8×2 topics
  19. Axially Moving Systems2▲ 44×1 topic
  20. Conflict Management2▲ 65×2 topics
  21. Health Disparities2▲ 11×2 topics
  22. Liver Transplantation2▲ 15×2 topics
  23. Living Kidney Donors2▲ 79×1 topic
  24. Nonlinear Dynamics2▲ 8.8×1 topic
  25. Organ Donation2▲ 79×1 topic
  26. Prevention2▲ 5.5×4 topics
  27. Prognostic Factors2▲ 5.0×8 topics
  28. Immune Dysregulation2▲ 26×1 topic
  29. Primary Immunodeficiency2▲ 53×1 topic
  30. Cancer Incidence2▲ 13×2 topics
  31. Incidence2▲ 34×2 topics
  32. Psychological Impact2▲ 9.0×4 topics
  33. Hemostasis1▲ 12×2 topics
  34. Neoadjuvant Therapy1▲ 8.3×3 topics
  35. Nutritional Support1▲ 20×3 topics
  36. Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura1▲ 43×1 topic
  37. Platelets1▲ 26×1 topic
  38. Preventive Services1▲ 32×2 topics
  39. Global Surveillance1▲ 41×1 topic
  40. Screening1▲ 17×2 topics

Which research topics does Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes, Organ Donation and Transplantation, Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment.

Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes: 1 fractional worksOrgan Donation and Transplantation: 0 fractional worksRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments: 0 fractional worksLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment: 0 fractional worksCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema: 0 fractional worksLiver Disease and Transplantation: 0 fractional worksCAR-T cell therapy resea…0CAR-T cell therapy research: 0 fractional worksGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening: 0 fractional worksEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer: 0 fractional worksEsophageal and GI Pathology: 0 fractional works
SurgeryPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthTransplantationPathology and Forensic Medicine4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes Surgery 1 works
  2. 2 Organ Donation and Transplantation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  3. 3 Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments Transplantation 0 works
  4. 4 Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
  5. 5 Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema Genetics 0 works
  6. 6 Liver Disease and Transplantation Hepatology 0 works
  7. 7 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 0 works
  8. 8 Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Oncology 0 works
  9. 9 Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  10. 10 Esophageal and GI Pathology Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available32.4%not open67.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors19.9%domestic only80.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 65% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000047% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy0.000053% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in St Louis

All research institutions in St Louis

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Midwest Therapeutic Endoscopy. Posts are plain text and can be reported.