Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 22k research works in it since 1950. 8.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the molecular mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of amyloidosis, with a particular emphasis on transthyretin-related cardiac and familial amyloid polyneuropathy. It covers topics such as RNAi therapy, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and immunoglobulin light chain involvement.

  • Transthyretin
  • Cardiac Amyloidosis
  • Light Chain Amyloidosis
  • RNAi Therapy
  • Diagnosis
  • Treatment
  • Prognosis
  • Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy
  • Immunoglobulin Light Chain
  • Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Research works
22k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
8.6%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+39%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.4k and 385 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.4k works
  2. 2 China 385 works
  3. 3 Japan 336 works
  4. 4 Italy 296 works
  5. 5 India 197 works
  6. 6 France 181 works
  7. 7 United Kingdom 163 works
  8. 8 Spain 162 works
  9. 9 Germany 139 works
  10. 10 Brazil 100 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 41.8%China: 11.4%Japan: 10.0%Italy: 8.8%6 others listed: 28.0%42%largest
United States1,409 · 41.8%China385 · 11.4%Japan336 · 10.0%Italy296 · 8.8%6 others listed941 · 28.0%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Cleveland Clinic publishes the most Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes research, followed by Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic in Arizona.

Who are the leading researchers in Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes include John C. Morris, Hugo A. Katus and Kaj Blennow.

  1. 1 John C. Morris United States 5.1k citations
  2. 2 Hugo A. Katus Germany 3.8k citations
  3. 3 Kaj Blennow Sweden 3.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes research done?

The largest centres of Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes research in 2022–2025 are New York (United States), Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom) and Boston (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Clarkston, Kumamoto and Rochester.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 New York United States 93 works
  2. 2 Beijing China 92 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 89 works
  4. 4 Boston United States 84 works
  5. 5 Tokyo Japan 71 works
  6. 6 Paris France 65 works
  7. 7 Cleveland United States 51 works
  8. 8 Rome Italy 44 works
  9. 9 Madrid Spain 43 works
  10. 10 Philadelphia United States 41 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ClarkstonUS · 20.7 works1082×
  2. KumamotoJP · 30.5 works32×
  3. RochesterUS · 36.9 works21×
  4. ScottsdaleUS · 33.1 works16×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes than the world average.

See Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes on the map

Where is the best place to study Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes?

Among universities, judged by research, Medical University of Vienna, University College London and Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 12.88%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Medical University of Vienna: 22, 10.6%University College London: 32, 16.5%Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna: 12, 16.4%Kumamoto University: 21, 12.2%National and Kapodistrian University of Athens: 22, 5.9%University of Pavia: 10, 16.5%Boston University: 17, 9.3%Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: 21, 5.2%Harvard University: 12, 17.7%University of Padua: 10, 18.5%University College L…Scuola Superiore San…Kumamoto UniversityMedical University o…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Medical University of ViennaAustria 75.710.6%16.8×22 +398.3%
2 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 66.516.5%5.5×32 +37.1%
3 Scuola Superiore Sant'AnnaItaly 64.016.4%28.9×12
4 Kumamoto UniversityJapan 61.812.2%36.8×21 +31.9%
5 National and Kapodistrian University of AthensGreece 57.15.9%10.1×22 +58.1%
6 University of PaviaItaly 55.016.5%8.3×10 +15.6%
7 Boston UniversityUnited States 47.69.3%8.0×17 -8.5%
8 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 46.45.2%5.1×21 +235.0%
9 Harvard UniversityUnited States 45.017.7%2.3×12 +43.1%
10 University of PaduaItaly 43.218.5%3.0×10 +22.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 39% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.