Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy is a research topic within Surgery. Science Explorer counts 41k research works in it since 1950. 16.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the optimization of perioperative fluid therapy, with an emphasis on assessing fluid responsiveness, hemodynamic monitoring, and goal-directed therapy. It explores various methods such as pulmonary artery catheterization, stroke volume variation, and passive leg raising to guide intraoperative fluid management and improve postoperative outcomes.
- Fluid Responsiveness
- Hemodynamic Monitoring
- Perioperative Care
- Cardiac Output
- Goal-Directed Therapy
- Intraoperative Fluid Management
- Pulmonary Artery Catheterization
- Stroke Volume Variation
- Passive Leg Raising
- Arterial Pressure Waveform
- Research works
- 41k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 6.6k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 16.0% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +21% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.6k and 783 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 1.6k works
- 2 China 783 works
- 3 India 395 works
- 4 United Kingdom 311 works
- 5 Italy 290 works
- 6 Japan 264 works
- 7 Germany 263 works
- 8 France 200 works
- 9 Canada 188 works
- 10 Türkiye 183 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Cleveland Clinic publishes the most Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy research, followed by Ain Shams University and Cairo University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Cleveland ClinicUnited States 27 works
- 2 Ain Shams UniversityEgypt 23 works
- 3 Cairo UniversityEgypt 23 works
- 4 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 22 works
- 5 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 20 works
- 6 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 19 works
- 7 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 19 works
- 8 University of PittsburghUnited States 18 works
- 9 Harvard UniversityUnited States 17 works
- 10 Massachusetts General HospitalUnited States 17 works
Who are the leading researchers in Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy include David Moher.
- 1 David Moher Canada 38k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy research done?
The largest centres of Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Seoul (South Korea), London (United Kingdom) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cleveland.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- ClevelandUS · 54.4 works5.7×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy?
Among universities, judged by research, Karolinska Institutet, Cairo University and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karolinska InstitutetSweden | 69.9 | 39.0% | 5.7× | 16 | +75.4% |
| 2 | Cairo UniversityEgypt | 50.9 | 5.1% | 4.6× | 23 | +202.0% |
| 3 | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina | 48.1 | 19.0% | 3.0× | 19 | +156.4% |
| 4 | Université Libre de BruxellesBelgium | 44.5 | 28.7% | 5.1× | 9 | +28.9% |
| 5 | Universität HamburgGermany | 44.1 | 40.9% | 2.5× | 9 | +25.3% |
| 6 | All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia | 44.0 | 9.9% | 5.5× | 22 | +66.8% |
| 7 | Ain Shams UniversityEgypt | 43.6 | 2.3% | 5.0× | 23 | +122.3% |
| 8 | Alexandria UniversityEgypt | 43.5 | 1.2% | 5.0× | 16 | +252.4% |
| 9 | Harvard UniversityUnited States | 42.5 | 20.9% | 2.1× | 17 | +51.7% |
| 10 | Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye | 41.7 | 5.8% | 5.3× | 20 | — |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 21% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.