Forskning.no (Norway)
In research, Forskning.no (Norway) stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,923 of 10,521 worldwide), Social Sciences (#5,829 of 6,365 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#11,307 of 11,982 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Social Psychology — Social Psychology is 10.3× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #24,336 of 28,054 · #22,400 all time
- Rank in Norway
- #121 of 133
- Research works
- 1.6k ▼ 42% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.5k 4.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 4.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 24% world 28%
What is Forskning.no (Norway) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,923 of 10,521 | 6.7% | 146 | #11909 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,829 of 6,365 | 7.2% | 77 | #7939 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #11,307 of 11,982 | 1.6% | 99 | #13778 | |
| MedicineField | #10,235 of 10,443 | 0.7% | 71 | #15992 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Forskning.no (Norway) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#11,909 #8,923
- Social Sciences#7,939 #5,829
- Health Sciences#13,778 #11,307
- Medicine#15,992 #10,235
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Forskning.no (Norway) specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Psychology takes 10.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Social PsychologySubfield · 26.7 works10×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 4.6×
- Health Professions 3.5×
- Social Sciences 2.1×
- Arts and Humanities 1.5×
- Decision Sciences 1.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.3×
- Medicine 1.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Nursing 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Energy 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Forskning.no (Norway)?
Ranked on the composite score, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Dorte Gannik and Dorthe Carlsen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Forskning.no (Norway).
- 1 Kaj Sparle Christensen Norway · #1,241,150 worldwide 23 citations · 35 works
- 2 Dorte Gannik Norway · #1,385,930 worldwide 3 citations · 27 works
- 3 Dorthe Carlsen Norway · #1,425,747 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
- 4 Thomas Rohde Skovdal Albrechtsen Norway · #1,446,278 worldwide 1 citations · 16 works
- 5 Annette Sofie Davidsen Norway · #1,588,095 worldwide 3 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Forskning.no (Norway)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Tacit Knowledge, Embodiment, Ethical Guidelines, Dementia Care, Interactional Expertise, Qualitative Research and Pedagogy.
- Reflective Practice
- Work Environment
- Judicial Review
- European Legal Systems
- Leadership
- Sense of Coherence
- Stress Management
- Adolescent Health
- Phenomenology
- Well-being
- Health Promotion
- Globalization
- Quality of Life
- Methodology
- Learning
- Epidemiology
- Pedagogy
- Interactional Expertise
- Ethical Guidelines
- Tacit Knowledge
- Education
- Embodiment
- Dementia Care
- Qualitative Research
- Social Sciences
- Public Health
- Discourse Analysis
- Special Education
- Sustainability
- Healthcare
- Human Rights
- Ethics
- Communication
- Psychological Resilience
- Salutogenesis
- Democracy
- Constitutionalism
- Health
- Family Dynamics
- Inclusion
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education30▲ 6.0×26 topics
- Tacit Knowledge26▲ 188×3 topics
- Embodiment26▲ 47×2 topics
- Ethical Guidelines24▲ 152×2 topics
- Dementia Care24▲ 667×1 topic
- Interactional Expertise24▲ 728×1 topic
- Qualitative Research23▲ 8.9×14 topics
- Pedagogy20▲ 14×5 topics
- Social Sciences20▲ 47×3 topics
- Epidemiology17▲ 1.47×48 topics
- Public Health16▲ 3.7×31 topics
- Learning16▲ 18×3 topics
- Discourse Analysis15▲ 20×2 topics
- Methodology14▲ 104×1 topic
- Special Education14▲ 86×1 topic
- Quality of Life11▲ 2.7×21 topics
- Sustainability11▲ 1.55×26 topics
- Globalization9▲ 1.50×16 topics
- Healthcare9▲ 2.6×11 topics
- Health Promotion8▲ 9.0×7 topics
- Human Rights8▲ 2.7×6 topics
- Well-being8▲ 7.0×9 topics
- Ethics7▲ 4.9×9 topics
- Phenomenology7▲ 21×4 topics
- Communication6▲ 7.1×5 topics
- Adolescent Health6▲ 25×2 topics
- Psychological Resilience6▲ 24×2 topics
- Stress Management6▲ 20×2 topics
- Salutogenesis6▲ 94×1 topic
- Sense of Coherence6▲ 94×1 topic
- Democracy6▲ 5.3×3 topics
- Leadership6▲ 4.0×11 topics
- Constitutionalism5▲ 19×2 topics
- European Legal Systems5▲ 46×1 topic
- Health5▲ 4.4×10 topics
- Judicial Review5▲ 20×1 topic
- Family Dynamics5▲ 13×1 topic
- Work Environment5▲ 85×1 topic
- Inclusion4▲ 9.1×6 topics
- Reflective Practice4▲ 7.0×5 topics
Which research topics does Forskning.no (Norway) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research, Social and Educational Sciences, Health, psychology, and well-being and European and International Law Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 24 works
- 2 Social and Educational Sciences Education 14 works
- 3 Health, psychology, and well-being General Health Professions 6 works
- 4 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 5 works
- 5 Research in Social Sciences Education 5 works
- 6 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 2 works
- 7 Innovative Education and Learning Practices Human Factors and Ergonomics 2 works
- 8 Architecture and Computational Design Architecture 2 works
- 9 Sociology and Cultural Identity Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 10 Urinary Tract Infections Management Epidemiology 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Forskning.no (Norway)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 42% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Oslo
- University of Oslo
- Oslo University Hospital
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Norwegian Cancer Society
- BI Norwegian Business School
- Norwegian Defence Research Establishment
- Norsk Hydro (Norway)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.