Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Neurology

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis is a research topic within Neurology. Science Explorer counts 24k research works in it since 1950. 8.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the diagnosis and management of cerebral vein thrombosis, including topics such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension, sinovenous thrombosis, venous sinus stenting, pseudotumor cerebri syndrome, intracranial pressure, optic disc drusen, cerebrospinal fluid shunting, and neuroimaging techniques.

  • Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
  • Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
  • Sinovenous Thrombosis
  • Dural Sinus Thrombosis
  • Venous Sinus Stenting
  • Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome
  • Intracranial Pressure
  • Optic Disc Drusen
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting
  • Neuroimaging
Research works
24k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
8.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+27%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1k and 460 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1k works
  2. 2 China 460 works
  3. 3 India 361 works
  4. 4 Japan 204 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 183 works
  6. 6 Türkiye 158 works
  7. 7 Germany 117 works
  8. 8 Italy 112 works
  9. 9 South Korea 111 works
  10. 10 France 109 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 36.5%China: 16.1%India: 12.6%Japan: 7.1%6 others listed: 27.6%37%largest
United States1,044 · 36.5%China460 · 16.1%India361 · 12.6%Japan204 · 7.1%6 others listed790 · 27.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Capital Medical University publishes the most Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research, followed by Neurological Surgery and All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Capital Medical UniversityChina 34 works
  2. 2 Neurological SurgeryUnited States 20 works
  3. 3 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 16 works
  4. 4 University of TorontoCanada 14 works
  5. 5 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 13 works
  6. 6 Mayo ClinicUnited States 13 works
  7. 7 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchIndia 13 works
  8. 8 Harvard UniversityUnited States 13 works
  9. 9 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 12 works
  10. 10 University of MiamiUnited States 12 works

Who are the leading researchers in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis include Jost B. Jonas and Tien Yin Wong.

  1. 1 Jost B. Jonas Germany 7.7k citations
  2. 2 Tien Yin Wong Singapore 4.3k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research done?

The largest centres of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), Seoul (South Korea) and Istanbul (Türkiye).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 110 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 55 works
  3. 3 Seoul South Korea 52 works
  4. 4 Istanbul Türkiye 48 works
  5. 5 Moscow Russia 47 works
  6. 6 Shanghai China 47 works
  7. 7 New York United States 46 works
  8. 8 Boston United States 45 works
  9. 9 Tokyo Japan 44 works
  10. 10 Paris France 41 works
See Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis on the map

Where is the best place to study Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis?

Among universities, judged by research, Capital Medical University, University of Birmingham and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 11.32%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Capital Medical University: 34, 10.3%University of Birmingham: 10, 23.7%Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research: 13, 3.6%All India Institute of Medical Sciences: 16, 2.3%Cairo University: 11, 10.5%Institute of Medical Sciences: 11, 1.5%Harvard University: 13, 12.9%University of California, Los Angeles: 10, 13.8%Johns Hopkins University: 12, 16.1%Sun Yat-sen University: 8, 18.5%University of Birmin…Capital Medical Univ…Post Graduate Instit…All India Institute …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Capital Medical UniversityChina 64.510.3%14.4×34 +58.1%
2 University of BirminghamUnited Kingdom 55.723.7%4.1×10 +134.9%
3 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchIndia 42.63.6%9.5×13 +92.1%
4 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 40.52.3%6.3×16 +186.8%
5 Cairo UniversityEgypt 39.010.5%3.4×11 +167.2%
6 Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 38.51.5%8.2×11 +156.9%
7 Harvard UniversityUnited States 38.412.9%2.4×13 +97.0%
8 University of California, Los AngelesUnited States 36.713.8%2.7×10 +119.7%
9 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 35.916.1%2.8×12 +13.7%
10 Sun Yat-sen UniversityChina 34.118.5%1.3×8 +107.5%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 27% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.