Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Topic · Neurology

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis is a research topic within Neurology. Science Explorer counts 24k research works in it since 1950. 10.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the diagnosis and management of cerebral vein thrombosis, including topics such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension, sinovenous thrombosis, venous sinus stenting, pseudotumor cerebri syndrome, intracranial pressure, optic disc drusen, cerebrospinal fluid shunting, and neuroimaging techniques.

  • Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
  • Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
  • Sinovenous Thrombosis
  • Dural Sinus Thrombosis
  • Venous Sinus Stenting
  • Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome
  • Intracranial Pressure
  • Optic Disc Drusen
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting
  • Neuroimaging
Research works
24k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.5k
per year above
Top-10% rate
10.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+8%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
36% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.2k and 544 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 1.2k works
  2. 2 China 544 works
  3. 3 India 409 works
  4. 4 Japan 234 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 202 works
  6. 6 Türkiye 184 works
  7. 7 Italy 131 works
  8. 8 Germany 126 works
  9. 9 France 125 works
  10. 10 South Korea 119 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 36.2%China: 16.7%India: 12.6%Japan: 7.2%6 others listed: 27.3%36%largest
United States1,178 · 36.2%China544 · 16.7%India409 · 12.6%Japan234 · 7.2%6 others listed886 · 27.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research?

By volume in 2022-now, Capital Medical University publishes the most Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research, followed by Harvard University and All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 Capital Medical UniversityChina 66 works
  2. 2 Harvard UniversityUnited States 47 works
  3. 3 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 39 works
  4. 4 Mayo ClinicUnited States 35 works
  5. 5 University of TorontoCanada 28 works
  6. 6 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 26 works
  7. 7 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 22 works
  8. 8 Neurological SurgeryUnited States 22 works
  9. 9 Fudan UniversityChina 21 works
  10. 10 Tel Aviv UniversityIsrael 18 works

Who are the leading researchers in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis include Jost Bruno Jonas, Jun Wang and Graeme J. Hankey.

  1. 1 Jost Bruno Jonas Germany 350k citations
  2. 2 Jun Wang China 340k citations
  3. 3 Graeme J. Hankey Australia 316k citations
  4. 4 Gregory Y.H. Lip United Kingdom 311k citations
  5. 5 Salim Yusuf Canada 294k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis?

The most cited paper in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis is "An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century" (Ralph L. Sacco, Scott Eric Kasner, Joseph P. Broderick et al., 2013), with 3,583 citations. Next come "Trends in the Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism" (2,678) and "The International Classification of Headache Disorders" (2,327).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 An Updated Definition of Stroke for the 21st Century Ralph L. Sacco, Scott Eric Kasner, Joseph P. Broderick et al. · Stroke Open access 8 May 2013 3,583
2 Trends in the Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Marc D. Silverstein, John A. Heit, David N. Mohr et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine 23 Mar 1998 2,678
3 The International Classification of Headache Disorders Jes Olesen · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain Open access May 2008 2,327
4 Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism John A. Heit, Marc D. Silverstein, David N. Mohr et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine 27 Mar 2000 2,186
5 The Long-Term Clinical Course of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis Paolo Prandoni, Anthonie W.A. Lensing, Alberto Cogo et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine Jul 1996 2,119
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research done?

The largest centres of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), Seoul (South Korea) and Istanbul (Türkiye). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Rockville Centre.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BeijingChina 127 works
  2. 2 LondonUnited Kingdom 61 works
  3. 3 SeoulSouth Korea 56 works
  4. 4 IstanbulTürkiye 54 works
  5. 5 ShanghaiChina 53 works
  6. 6 BostonUnited States 52 works
  7. 7 New YorkUnited States 52 works
  8. 8 TokyoJapan 51 works
  9. 9 MoscowRussia 50 works
  10. 10 ParisFrance 48 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Rockville CentreUS · 21.5 works32×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis than the world average.

See Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis on the map

Where is the best place to study Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Copenhagen, University of Birmingham and Capital Medical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 17.15%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →University of Copenh…University of Birmin…Harvard UniversityCapital Medical Univ…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1University of CopenhagenDenmark 74.134.2%3.8×15 +40.6%
2University of BirminghamUnited Kingdom 70.629.5%6.2×16 +11.5%
3Capital Medical UniversityChina 67.215.5%14.6×66 +16.4%
4Harvard UniversityUnited States 63.719.2%3.5×47 -6.2%
5Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 58.617.0%4.0×26 +2.7%
6University College LondonUnited Kingdom 51.713.0%3.3×22 -4.5%
7Emory UniversityUnited States 50.513.7%4.7×16 +21.8%
8University of TorontoCanada 47.011.0%3.3×28 -21.1%
9University of MiamiUnited States 47.010.3%5.8×15 +21.8%
10Tel Aviv UniversityIsrael 46.88.1%5.3×18 +34.8%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis, country by country

Is Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 8% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.020% in 2024.

still counting0.020%0.040%Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis0.019% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis10.3% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis. Posts are plain text and can be reported.