Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Educational Technology and E-Learning

Educational Technology and E-Learning is a research topic within Information Systems. Science Explorer counts 3.4k research works in it since 2000. 15.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the impact and implementation of digital learning, including e-learning platforms, blended learning models, use of multimedia in education, teacher training for digital pedagogy, and the challenges and opportunities presented by pandemic education. The research covers a wide range of topics related to the integration of technology in educational settings.

  • Digital Learning
  • E-learning Platforms
  • Blended Learning
  • Educational Technology
  • Online Teaching
  • Learning Management System
  • Multimedia in Education
  • Teacher Training
  • Student Motivation
  • Pandemic Education
Research works
3.4k
fractional, since 2000
In the world top 10%
537
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+480%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Educational Technology and E-Learning research?

By volume, Indonesia and India publish the most (1.1k and 72 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Indonesia 1.1k works
  2. 2 India 72 works
  3. 3 Malaysia 58 works
  4. 4 ?? 42 works
  5. 5 United States 35 works
  6. 6 Nigeria 33 works
  7. 7 China 28 works
  8. 8 Philippines 28 works
  9. 9 Pakistan 21 works
  10. 10 South Africa 20 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Indonesia: 77.2%India: 4.9%Malaysia: 3.9%??: 2.9%6 others listed: 11.2%77%largest
Indonesia1,138 · 77.2%India72 · 4.9%Malaysia58 · 3.9%??42 · 2.9%6 others listed165 · 11.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Educational Technology and E-Learning research?

By volume in 2022–2025, State University of Malang publishes the most Educational Technology and E-Learning research, followed by State University of Padang and Indonesia University of Education.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 State University of Malang Indonesia 45 works
  2. 2 State University of Padang Indonesia 41 works
  3. 3 Indonesia University of Education Indonesia 40 works
  4. 4 Yogyakarta State University Indonesia 34 works
  5. 5 State University of Semarang Indonesia 32 works
  6. 6 State University of Medan Indonesia 31 works
  7. 7 State University of Jakarta Indonesia 30 works
  8. 8 Universitas Negeri Surabaya Indonesia 28 works
  9. 9 State University of Makassar Indonesia 27 works
  10. 10 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Indonesia 19 works

Where is Educational Technology and E-Learning research done?

The largest centres of Educational Technology and E-Learning research in 2022–2025 are Jakarta (Indonesia), Bandung (Indonesia), Yogyakarta (Indonesia) and Semarang (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Padang, Malang and Semarang.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Jakarta Indonesia 119 works
  2. 2 Bandung Indonesia 94 works
  3. 3 Yogyakarta Indonesia 71 works
  4. 4 Semarang Indonesia 69 works
  5. 5 Malang Indonesia 64 works
  6. 6 Surabaya Indonesia 62 works
  7. 7 Medan Indonesia 58 works
  8. 8 Padang Indonesia 54 works
  9. 9 Makassar Indonesia 47 works
  10. 10 Surakarta Indonesia 26 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PadangID · 53.8 works15×
  2. MalangID · 64.2 works12×
  3. SemarangID · 68.9 works12×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Educational Technology and E-Learning than the world average.

See Educational Technology and E-Learning on the map

Where is the best place to study Educational Technology and E-Learning?

Among universities, judged by research, Yogyakarta State University, State University of Padang and Universitas Negeri Surabaya score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 13.72%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Yogyakarta State University: 34, 13.7%State University of Padang: 41, 18.1%Universitas Negeri Surabaya: 28, 11.1%State University of Malang: 44, 11.6%State University of Semarang: 32, 9.5%Indonesia University of Education: 40, 11.3%Universitas Jember: 9, 22.5%State University of Jakarta: 30, 10.3%State University of Makassar: 27, 11.5%Universitas PGRI Semarang: 14, 17.6%State University of …Yogyakarta State Uni…State University of …Universitas Negeri S…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Yogyakarta State University Indonesia 82.913.7%36.6×34 +819.4%
2State University of Padang Indonesia 77.218.1%22.9×41
3Universitas Negeri Surabaya Indonesia 75.311.1%22.9×28 +209.1%
4State University of Malang Indonesia 75.111.6%28.1×44
5State University of Semarang Indonesia 74.99.5%25.1×32 +227.6%
6Indonesia University of Education Indonesia 69.111.3%24.1×40
7Universitas Jember Indonesia 63.722.5%9.4×9
8State University of Jakarta Indonesia 63.510.3%34.1×30
9State University of Makassar Indonesia 62.911.5%20.5×27
10Universitas PGRI Semarang Indonesia 62.617.6%18.1×14

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Educational Technology and E-Learning research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 480% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Educational Technology and E-Learning.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.