Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Infant Nutrition and Health

Infant Nutrition and Health is a research topic within Nutrition and Dietetics. Science Explorer counts 33k research works in it since 1950. 20.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the composition and health effects of human milk, particularly in relation to preterm infants. It covers topics such as the composition of human milk, the impact on growth outcomes and neurodevelopment, the role in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis, the significance of oligosaccharides and lactoferrin, the development of intestinal microbiota, and the use of probiotics. The papers also discuss the nutritional and immune developmental significance of human milk for preterm infants.

  • Human Milk Composition
  • Preterm Infants
  • Necrotizing Enterocolitis
  • Oligosaccharides
  • Lactoferrin
  • Growth Outcomes
  • Microbiota Development
  • Probiotics
  • Nutritional Significance
  • Immune Development
Research works
33k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
20.2%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+32%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Infant Nutrition and Health research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (1.1k and 1k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 1.1k works
  2. 2 United States 1k works
  3. 3 India 324 works
  4. 4 Indonesia 196 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 189 works
  6. 6 Brazil 186 works
  7. 7 Canada 153 works
  8. 8 Italy 151 works
  9. 9 Türkiye 151 works
  10. 10 Japan 139 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 30.0%United States: 28.8%India: 9.0%Indonesia: 5.4%6 others listed: 26.8%30%largest
China1,081 · 30.0%United States1,038 · 28.8%India324 · 9.0%Indonesia196 · 5.4%6 others listed968 · 26.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Infant Nutrition and Health research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Jiangnan University publishes the most Infant Nutrition and Health research, followed by State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology and China Agricultural University.

Who are the leading researchers in Infant Nutrition and Health?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Infant Nutrition and Health include Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Peter R. Galle and Johan G. Eriksson.

  1. 1 Zulfiqar A Bhutta Pakistan 7k citations
  2. 2 Peter R. Galle Germany 3.3k citations
  3. 3 Johan G. Eriksson Finland 3.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Infant Nutrition and Health research done?

The largest centres of Infant Nutrition and Health research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Wuxi (China), London (United Kingdom) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Wuxi and Davis.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 155 works
  2. 2 Wuxi China 71 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 66 works
  4. 4 Shanghai China 63 works
  5. 5 Guangzhou China 58 works
  6. 6 Paris France 50 works
  7. 7 Tokyo Japan 45 works
  8. 8 Nanjing China 44 works
  9. 9 Hangzhou China 43 works
  10. 10 Seoul South Korea 42 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. WuxiCN · 71.4 works14×
  2. DavisUS · 21.9 works5.2×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Infant Nutrition and Health than the world average.

See Infant Nutrition and Health on the map

Where is the best place to study Infant Nutrition and Health?

Among universities, judged by research, Jiangnan University, Dalian Polytechnic University and Northeast Agricultural University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 33.71%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Jiangnan University: 38, 42.9%Dalian Polytechnic University: 11, 45.1%Northeast Agricultural University: 23, 38.0%China Agricultural University: 26, 36.0%Shenyang Agricultural University: 9, 36.6%University College Cork: 8, 37.7%Wageningen University & Research: 14, 24.9%The University of Western Australia: 16, 22.0%University of Auckland: 11, 35.9%Medical University of Warsaw: 11, 18.0%Dalian Polytechnic U…Jiangnan UniversityNortheast Agricultur…China Agricultural U…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Jiangnan UniversityChina 87.242.9%11.6×38 +153.4%
2 Dalian Polytechnic UniversityChina 67.645.1%10.9×11 +94.7%
3 Northeast Agricultural UniversityChina 64.138.0%16.0×23 -62.0%
4 China Agricultural UniversityChina 61.736.0%8.3×26 -37.7%
5 Shenyang Agricultural UniversityChina 54.036.6%12.3×9 -0.0%
6 University College CorkIreland 54.037.7%6.1×8 +105.2%
7 Wageningen University & ResearchNetherlands 52.724.9%6.9×14 +48.7%
8 The University of Western AustraliaAustralia 50.322.0%7.3×16 -1.5%
9 University of AucklandNew Zealand 48.535.9%3.9×11 +62.4%
10 Medical University of WarsawPoland 48.418.0%9.1×11 +91.4%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Infant Nutrition and Health research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 32% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Infant Nutrition and Health.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.