Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Education

Service-Learning and Community Engagement

Service-Learning and Community Engagement is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 15k research works in it since 1950. 26.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the impact of service-learning in higher education, focusing on community engagement, civic education, social justice, and student development. It delves into the effects of service-learning on academic outcomes, civic engagement, and the development of reflective and responsible citizens through university-community partnerships.

  • Service-Learning
  • Community Engagement
  • Civic Education
  • Social Justice
  • Reflection
  • Academic Outcomes
  • Civic Engagement
  • University-Community Partnerships
  • Student Development
  • Pedagogy
Research works
15k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4k
per year above
Top-10% rate
26.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+24%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Service-Learning and Community Engagement research?

By volume, the United States and Canada publish the most (1.6k and 170 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.6k works
  2. 2 Canada 170 works
  3. 3 Spain 119 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 118 works
  5. 5 Australia 107 works
  6. 6 Indonesia 69 works
  7. 7 South Africa 66 works
  8. 8 India 55 works
  9. 9 China 52 works
  10. 10 Italy 50 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 66.4%Canada: 7.1%Spain: 5.0%United Kingdom: 4.9%6 others listed: 16.6%66%largest
United States1,595 · 66.4%Canada170 · 7.1%Spain119 · 5.0%United Kingdom118 · 4.9%6 others listed399 · 16.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Service-Learning and Community Engagement research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Purdue University West Lafayette publishes the most Service-Learning and Community Engagement research, followed by The Ohio State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Purdue University West Lafayette United States 17 works
  2. 2 The Ohio State University United States 16 works
  3. 3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States 15 works
  4. 4 University of Florida United States 14 works
  5. 5 Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong 14 works
  6. 6 Arizona State University United States 13 works
  7. 7 University of Wisconsin–Madison United States 12 works
  8. 8 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States 12 works
  9. 9 Michigan State University United States 12 works
  10. 10 University of Calgary Canada 12 works

Where is Service-Learning and Community Engagement research done?

The largest centres of Service-Learning and Community Engagement research in 2022–2025 are New York (United States), Washington D.C. (United States), Toronto (Canada) and London (United Kingdom).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 New York United States 51 works
  2. 2 Washington D.C. United States 36 works
  3. 3 Toronto Canada 26 works
  4. 4 London United Kingdom 26 works
  5. 5 Los Angeles United States 23 works
  6. 6 Chicago United States 22 works
  7. 7 Madrid Spain 22 works
  8. 8 Melbourne Australia 21 works
  9. 9 Hong Kong China 20 works
  10. 10 Baltimore United States 19 works
See Service-Learning and Community Engagement on the map

Where is the best place to study Service-Learning and Community Engagement?

Among universities, judged by research, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, University of Colorado Boulder and Arizona State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%mean 25.23%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Hong Kong Polytechnic University: 14, 58.2%University of Colorado Boulder: 9, 49.6%Arizona State University: 13, 24.3%Purdue University West Lafayette: 17, 13.9%University of Calgary: 12, 20.0%Utah State University: 11, 5.6%The Ohio State University: 16, 17.5%Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis: 9, 16.6%University of Kentucky: 12, 15.5%Michigan State University: 12, 31.1%Hong Kong Polytechni…University of Colora…Arizona State Univer…Purdue University We…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong 77.658.2%5.3×14 +277.2%
2University of Colorado Boulder United States 58.049.6%8.1×9 +101.4%
3Arizona State University United States 50.324.3%6.9×13 +103.5%
4Purdue University West Lafayette United States 49.313.9%6.1×17 +118.7%
5University of Calgary Canada 48.920.0%6.5×12 +146.2%
6Utah State University United States 47.85.6%20.0×11 +155.0%
7The Ohio State University United States 45.717.5%5.9×16 +73.3%
8Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis United States 43.816.6%10.4×9 +61.6%
9University of Kentucky United States 42.815.5%8.9×12 +26.6%
10Michigan State University United States 41.731.1%5.8×12 +9.0%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Service-Learning and Community Engagement research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 24% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Service-Learning and Community Engagement.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.