Georgia vs Hungary
On research quality in 2022-now, Hungary ranks #32 in the world and Georgia #120, of 189 countries. Georgia stands higher in 0 of the 24 fields both publish in, Hungary in 24.
Research profiles alike: 0.64similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Georgia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #120
- #129 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 11k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 3.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 55%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Classics, Archeology.
Hungary
- World rank, 2022-now
- #32
- #36 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 69k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 8.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 48%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Geography, Planning and Development, Life-span and Life-course Studies, Archeology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Hungary leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and citations per work. Georgia leads on 3 of 9 measures: open access, international co-authorship and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #120Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#32
- 0.40×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.87×
- 11kOutputfractional works, 2022-now69k
- 3.6%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited8.6%
- 5.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work14.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 55%Open accessof its works free to read, all time48%
- 26%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time24%
- +81%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+23%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Georgia stands higher in 0 of 24 fields, Hungary in 24. Hungary leads most in Computer Science (#38 against #122). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #92Agricultural and Biological Sciences#33
- #91Arts and Humanities#30
- #94Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#30
- #101Business, Management and Accounting#31
- -Chemistry#41
- #122Computer Science#38
- -Decision Sciences#37
- -Dentistry#30
- #59Earth and Planetary Sciences#37
- #69Economics, Econometrics and Finance#29
- -Energy#41
- #117Engineering#37
- #113Environmental Science#38
- #100Health Professions#33
- -Immunology and Microbiology#33
- -Materials Science#40
- #78Mathematics#30
- #108Medicine#33
- -Neuroscience#24
- -Nursing#35
- -Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#28
- #54Physics and Astronomy#27
- #93Psychology#31
- #106Social Sciences#31
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Georgia rank | Hungary rank | Georgia top 10% | Hungary top 10% | Georgia works | Hungary works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #92 | #33 | 1.9% | 9.5% | 1k | 4.1k |
| Arts and Humanities | #91 | #30 | 2.6% | 8.6% | 883 | 3.5k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #94 | #30 | 3.5% | 7.8% | 410 | 3.3k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #101 | #31 | 3.8% | 10.2% | 352 | 2.2k |
| Chemistry | - | #41 | - | 5.1% | - | 1k |
| Computer Science | #122 | #38 | 4.0% | 7.6% | 421 | 4.1k |
| Decision Sciences | - | #37 | - | 8.6% | - | 695 |
| Dentistry | - | #30 | - | 20.5% | - | 260 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #59 | #37 | 3.7% | 7.0% | 207 | 1.2k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #69 | #29 | 6.6% | 10.0% | 846 | 1.9k |
| Energy | - | #41 | - | 8.2% | - | 464 |
| Engineering | #117 | #37 | 4.0% | 7.1% | 597 | 7.8k |
| Environmental Science | #113 | #38 | 5.0% | 8.6% | 366 | 3.1k |
| Health Professions | #100 | #33 | 3.5% | 9.3% | 209 | 1.3k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #33 | - | 8.4% | - | 526 |
| Materials Science | - | #40 | - | 6.7% | - | 1.4k |
| Mathematics | #78 | #30 | 3.2% | 8.3% | 251 | 1k |
| Medicine | #108 | #33 | 3.6% | 9.3% | 1.5k | 9.3k |
| Neuroscience | - | #24 | - | 8.4% | - | 1.1k |
| Nursing | - | #35 | - | 10.6% | - | 231 |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | - | #28 | - | 9.2% | - | 253 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #54 | #27 | 4.4% | 7.0% | 208 | 1.6k |
| Psychology | #93 | #31 | 2.8% | 7.3% | 283 | 2.6k |
| Social Sciences | #106 | #31 | 3.6% | 9.4% | 2.4k | 16k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Georgia
- Geopolitics
- Taxonomy
- Sovereignty
- Historical Phonology
- Political Economy
- Ethnobotanical Survey
- International Relations
- Drug Discovery
- Regional Development
- Herbal Medicine
- Language
- Antioxidant
- Human Rights
- Post-Communist Countries
- Education
- Human Capital
- Medicinal Plants
- Sustainable Development
- Sustainability
- Innovation
- Globalization
- Economic Development
- Climate Change
- Labor Market
- Agriculture
- Financial Crisis
- Artificial Intelligence
- Trade Relations
- Migration
- Digital Transformation
- Linguistics
- Biogeography
- Phylogeny
- Economy
- Phytochemical Constituents
- Traditional Ecological Knowledge
- Etymology
- Russia
- Nation-Building
- Central Asia
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization1,176▲ 4.8×126 topics
- Innovation819▲ 6.4×66 topics
- Economic Development692▲ 7.0×45 topics
- Sustainability667▲ 2.2×104 topics
- Climate Change618▲ 1.83×109 topics
- Sustainable Development519▲ 2.7×90 topics
- Labor Market493▲ 14×17 topics
- Medicinal Plants472▲ 9.8×18 topics
- Agriculture471▲ 10.0×13 topics
- Human Capital441▲ 23×10 topics
- Financial Crisis412▲ 30×13 topics
- Education410▲ 1.92×94 topics
- Artificial Intelligence396▲ 2.2×51 topics
- Post-Communist Countries380▲ 199×1 topic
- Trade Relations380▲ 199×1 topic
- Human Rights355▲ 2.8×76 topics
- Migration318▲ 7.5×30 topics
- Antioxidant291▲ 3.4×50 topics
- Digital Transformation272▲ 4.1×27 topics
- Language269▲ 8.8×14 topics
- Linguistics247▲ 13×7 topics
- Herbal Medicine232▲ 6.7×13 topics
- Biogeography230▲ 6.7×20 topics
- Regional Development228▲ 5.4×19 topics
- Phylogeny225▲ 11×17 topics
- Drug Discovery205▲ 7.4×12 topics
- Economy197▲ 21×4 topics
- International Relations189▲ 6.3×28 topics
- Phytochemical Constituents188▲ 49×2 topics
- Ethnobotanical Survey187▲ 47×1 topic
- Traditional Ecological Knowledge187▲ 35×1 topic
- Political Economy180▲ 5.7×17 topics
- Etymology174▲ 30×2 topics
- Historical Phonology174▲ 30×2 topics
- Russia172▲ 33×3 topics
- Sovereignty170▲ 15×9 topics
- Nation-Building168▲ 25×4 topics
- Taxonomy162▲ 9.0×15 topics
- Central Asia159▲ 18×4 topics
- Geopolitics156▲ 8.3×11 topics
Hungary
- Visegrad Group
- Soft Power
- Postcolonial Theory
- Sociology
- Cold War
- Eastern Europe
- Geopolitics
- Religion
- Nationalism
- Identity
- Biodiversity
- Sustainable Development
- Artificial Intelligence
- Education
- Epidemiology
- Environmental Influence
- Policy
- Regional Disparities
- Economic Development
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Innovation
- Knowledge Management
- Social Impact
- Tourism
- Climate Change
- Machine Learning
- Inflammation
- Human Rights
- Environmental Impact
- European Union
- Invasive Species
- International Relations
- European Integration
- Diplomacy
- Soviet Union
- National Identity
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Australia
- Central Europe
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability7,962▲ 4.2×137 topics
- Globalization7,804▲ 5.1×174 topics
- Innovation6,693▲ 8.3×89 topics
- Economic Development6,345▲ 10×57 topics
- Knowledge Management6,104▲ 14×40 topics
- Regional Disparities6,074▲ 165×2 topics
- Social Impact5,955▲ 19×25 topics
- Policy5,925▲ 35×16 topics
- Tourism5,878▲ 82×9 topics
- Environmental Influence5,802▲ 252×1 topic
- Climate Change2,714▲ 1.28×130 topics
- Epidemiology2,159▼ 0.69×139 topics
- Machine Learning1,914▼ 0.74×97 topics
- Education1,437◆ 1.07×156 topics
- Inflammation1,306▼ 0.79×83 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1,262◆ 1.13×65 topics
- Human Rights1,246▲ 1.56×90 topics
- Sustainable Development1,239◆ 1.01×110 topics
- Environmental Impact1,231◆ 0.92×73 topics
- Biodiversity966▲ 1.62×38 topics
- European Union950▲ 5.5×29 topics
- Identity882▲ 1.56×78 topics
- Invasive Species868▲ 2.6×21 topics
- Nationalism857▲ 2.4×34 topics
- International Relations838▲ 4.4×31 topics
- Religion709▲ 1.96×43 topics
- European Integration636▲ 15×6 topics
- Geopolitics633▲ 5.3×12 topics
- Diplomacy539▲ 7.4×9 topics
- Eastern Europe519▲ 13×3 topics
- Soviet Union499▲ 12×3 topics
- Cold War486▲ 10×5 topics
- National Identity477▲ 5.3×11 topics
- Sociology466▲ 4.3×27 topics
- Cultural Diplomacy450▲ 7.1×5 topics
- Postcolonial Theory437▲ 21×4 topics
- Australia425▲ 34×1 topic
- Soft Power393▲ 12×3 topics
- Central Europe352▲ 57×1 topic
- Visegrad Group352▲ 57×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Hungary has out-published Georgia every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0003
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#33
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Georgia or Hungary?
Hungary publishes 6.5× as much research as Georgia in 2022-now (69k against 11k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Georgia or Hungary?
8.6% of Hungary's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 3.6% for Georgia.
Is Georgia or Hungary growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +81% against 2018-21 for Georgia, and +23% for Hungary.
Which has more open access research, Georgia or Hungary?
55% of Georgia's research is free to read, against 48% of Hungary's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Georgia or Hungary?
Georgia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Hungary 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 3.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Georgia
- 1Ilia State University3.6% top 10% · 1.6k works
- 2Tbilisi State University3.4% top 10% · 2.1k works
- 3Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University4.5% top 10% · 649 works
- 4International Black Sea University6.3% top 10% · 261 works
- 5University of Georgia14.7% top 10% · 218 works
- 6Georgian Technical University2.1% top 10% · 1.1k works
Hungary
- 1Hungarian Research Network9.3% top 10% · 5k works
- 2Eötvös Loránd University9.7% top 10% · 6.3k works
- 3Hungarian Academy of Sciences9.4% top 10% · 4.2k works
- 4Corvinus University of Budapest13.7% top 10% · 1.9k works
- 5University of Debrecen8.1% top 10% · 5.9k works
- 6Budapest University of Technology and Economics7.0% top 10% · 4.7k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Georgia
- 1 F. Chlebana #33,051 worldwide 6k citations · 76 works
- 2 David Lordkipanidze #43,553 worldwide 8.8k citations · 168 works
- 3 J. Sturdy #43,642 worldwide 6.3k citations · 89 works
- 4 A. Petrilli #45,877 worldwide 3.4k citations · 55 works
- 5 K. Sung #50,952 worldwide 7.7k citations · 100 works
Hungary
- 1 Z. Frei #1,545 worldwide 71k citations · 273 works
- 2 M. Tápai #1,944 worldwide 72k citations · 134 works
- 3 Attila Szolnoki #5,052 worldwide 23k citations · 291 works
- 4 M. Vasúth #6,543 worldwide 59k citations · 224 works
- 5 Abderahman Rejeb #8,541 worldwide 8.8k citations · 137 works
Other comparisons
Hungaryvs
South Africa
Hungaryvs
Ireland
Hungaryvs
Saudi Arabia
Chilevs
Hungary
Greecevs
Hungary
Hungaryvs
Luxembourg