Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Food Science

Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability is a research topic within Food Science. Science Explorer counts 18k research works in it since 1951. 26.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the quantification, management, and reduction of food waste across food supply chains, households, and consumer behaviors. It explores the environmental impacts of food waste, strategies for waste reduction, and the role of packaging in minimizing waste. The cluster also addresses the societal and economic implications of food waste, aiming to promote sustainable practices and policies.

  • Food Waste
  • Supply Chain
  • Household Behavior
  • Environmental Impact
  • Waste Reduction
  • Food Loss
  • Packaging
  • Sustainability
  • Consumer Attitudes
  • Global Impact
Research works
18k
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
4.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
26.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+173%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability research?

By volume, India and the United States publish the most (808 and 672 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 India 808 works
  2. 2 United States 672 works
  3. 3 China 521 works
  4. 4 Indonesia 393 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 367 works
  6. 6 Brazil 352 works
  7. 7 Italy 331 works
  8. 8 Türkiye 247 works
  9. 9 Malaysia 219 works
  10. 10 Australia 195 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

India: 19.7%United States: 16.4%China: 12.7%Indonesia: 9.6%6 others listed: 41.7%20%largest
India808 · 19.7%United States672 · 16.4%China521 · 12.7%Indonesia393 · 9.6%6 others listed1,711 · 41.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Wageningen University & Research publishes the most Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability research, followed by Universiti Teknologi MARA and IPB University.

Who are the leading researchers in Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability include Cyrus Cooper and David Julian McClements.

  1. 1 Cyrus Cooper United Kingdom 7.2k citations
  2. 2 David Julian McClements United States 4.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability research done?

The largest centres of Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom), Jakarta (Indonesia) and Wageningen (Netherlands). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Wageningen.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 123 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 74 works
  3. 3 Jakarta Indonesia 62 works
  4. 4 Wageningen Netherlands 61 works
  5. 5 New Delhi India 55 works
  6. 6 Paris France 50 works
  7. 7 Tehran Iran 50 works
  8. 8 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 50 works
  9. 9 Istanbul Türkiye 48 works
  10. 10 São Paulo Brazil 44 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. WageningenNL · 60.9 works21×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability than the world average.

See Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability on the map

Where is the best place to study Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability?

Among universities, judged by research, Wageningen University & Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and University of Parma score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 42.93%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Wageningen University & Research: 57, 44.6%Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 18, 48.3%University of Parma: 16, 45.5%Warsaw University of Life Sciences: 18, 23.6%Central Queensland University: 11, 47.2%Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem: 9, 33.6%Università degli Studi della Tuscia: 9, 27.2%ETH Zurich: 8, 66.8%University of Copenhagen: 14, 49.1%University of Bologna: 19, 43.4%Swedish University o…University of ParmaWageningen Universit…Warsaw University of…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Wageningen University & ResearchNetherlands 81.844.6%21.3×57 +89.0%
2 Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesSweden 71.148.3%15.8×18 +56.9%
3 University of ParmaItaly 68.345.5%9.7×16 +157.7%
4 Warsaw University of Life SciencesPoland 61.823.6%15.1×18 +375.1%
5 Central Queensland UniversityAustralia 60.747.2%14.4×11
6 Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi EgyetemHungary 60.733.6%12.5×9 +326.4%
7 Università degli Studi della TusciaItaly 57.927.2%18.1×9 +617.2%
8 ETH ZurichSwitzerland 55.766.8%1.6×8 +273.4%
9 University of CopenhagenDenmark 54.749.1%2.7×14 +187.1%
10 University of BolognaItaly 54.143.4%3.2×19 +303.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 173% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.