Nepal vs Sudan
On research quality in 2022-now, Nepal ranks #109 in the world and Sudan #110, of 189 countries. Nepal stands higher in 16 of the 21 fields both publish in, Sudan in 5.
Research profiles alike: 0.57similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Nepal
- World rank, 2022-now
- #109
- #89 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 33k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 4.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 76%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Drug Discovery, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Dentistry.
Sudan
- World rank, 2022-now
- #110
- #114 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 7.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 7.1%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 65%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Microbiology, Forestry, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Nepal leads on 4 of 9 measures: research quality, output, open access and growth. Sudan leads on 4 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and international co-authorship. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #109Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#110
- 0.42×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.69×
- 33kOutputfractional works, 2022-now7.7k
- 4.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited7.1%
- 7.2Citations per workall time, per fractional work9.3
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 76%Open accessof its works free to read, all time65%
- 25%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time40%
- +54%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+22%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Nepal stands higher in 16 of 21 fields, Sudan in 5. Nepal leads most in Environmental Science (#84 against #104); Sudan leads most in Computer Science (#99 against #113). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #89Agricultural and Biological Sciences#106
- #76Arts and Humanities-
- #82Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#76
- #103Business, Management and Accounting-
- #54Chemistry-
- #113Computer Science#99
- #62Decision Sciences-
- #56Dentistry-
- #64Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #93Economics, Econometrics and Finance-
- #91Engineering#89
- #84Environmental Science#104
- #84Health Professions#79
- #65Immunology and Microbiology-
- #66Materials Science-
- #76Mathematics-
- #127Medicine#116
- #68Neuroscience-
- #62Nursing-
- #88Psychology-
- #124Social Sciences#127
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Nepal rank | Sudan rank | Nepal top 10% | Sudan top 10% | Nepal works | Sudan works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #89 | #106 | 5.5% | 5.4% | 2.8k | 782 |
| Arts and Humanities | #76 | - | 6.8% | - | 990 | - |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #82 | #76 | 4.9% | 7.5% | 1k | 374 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #103 | - | 4.8% | - | 1.4k | - |
| Chemistry | #54 | - | 9.4% | - | 245 | - |
| Computer Science | #113 | #99 | 5.0% | 7.8% | 2k | 446 |
| Decision Sciences | #62 | - | 4.9% | - | 458 | - |
| Dentistry | #56 | - | 2.3% | - | 386 | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #64 | - | 6.0% | - | 253 | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #93 | - | 3.9% | - | 1.2k | - |
| Engineering | #91 | #89 | 4.5% | 9.2% | 3.1k | 686 |
| Environmental Science | #84 | #104 | 5.1% | 6.3% | 1.9k | 315 |
| Health Professions | #84 | #79 | 6.7% | 10.5% | 1.2k | 274 |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #65 | - | 5.6% | - | 312 | - |
| Materials Science | #66 | - | 6.2% | - | 494 | - |
| Mathematics | #76 | - | 7.7% | - | 292 | - |
| Medicine | #127 | #116 | 3.4% | 5.4% | 8.6k | 2.2k |
| Neuroscience | #68 | - | 5.0% | - | 233 | - |
| Nursing | #62 | - | 5.0% | - | 276 | - |
| Psychology | #88 | - | 5.3% | - | 1k | - |
| Social Sciences | #124 | #127 | 6.1% | 8.0% | 4k | 1k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Nepal
- Health Systems
- Health Inequalities
- Youth Employment
- Identity Politics
- Maternal Mortality
- IoT
- Poverty
- Food Security
- Depression
- Conflict
- Remote Sensing
- Pandemic
- Diagnosis
- Sustainable Development
- Environmental Impact
- Treatment
- COVID-19
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Globalization
- Education
- Public Health
- Economic Growth
- Quality of Life
- Risk Factors
- Mental Health
- Renewable Energy
- Healthcare
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Management
- Risk Management
- Social Inequality
- Surgical Management
- Democratization
- Maoist Insurgency
- Community Health Workers
- Child Mortality
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology2,371▲ 1.61×135 topics
- Climate Change1,795▲ 1.78×118 topics
- Machine Learning1,547▲ 1.25×96 topics
- Deep Learning1,443◆ 1.13×85 topics
- Globalization1,274▲ 1.75×120 topics
- Sustainability1,243▲ 1.37×107 topics
- Education906▲ 1.42×107 topics
- COVID-19880▲ 1.83×31 topics
- Public Health754▲ 1.40×62 topics
- Treatment745▲ 1.65×52 topics
- Economic Growth711▲ 2.4×32 topics
- Environmental Impact703◆ 1.11×69 topics
- Quality of Life697▲ 1.30×57 topics
- Sustainable Development675▲ 1.16×94 topics
- Risk Factors662▲ 1.62×37 topics
- Diagnosis650▲ 1.88×41 topics
- Mental Health633▲ 1.19×45 topics
- Pandemic632▲ 1.72×13 topics
- Renewable Energy608◆ 1.13×55 topics
- Remote Sensing576▲ 1.27×42 topics
- Healthcare552▲ 1.31×38 topics
- Conflict544▲ 9.1×10 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease520▲ 1.23×39 topics
- Depression498▲ 1.53×25 topics
- Management494▲ 1.67×38 topics
- Food Security480▲ 2.4×22 topics
- Risk Management469▲ 2.7×17 topics
- Poverty416▲ 12×5 topics
- Social Inequality376▲ 3.8×11 topics
- IoT364▲ 2.6×19 topics
- Surgical Management362▲ 2.4×20 topics
- Maternal Mortality338▲ 4.1×5 topics
- Democratization326▲ 13×4 topics
- Identity Politics315▲ 18×3 topics
- Maoist Insurgency315▲ 161×1 topic
- Youth Employment315▲ 42×1 topic
- Community Health Workers245▲ 7.5×2 topics
- Health Inequalities239▲ 5.3×5 topics
- Child Mortality216▲ 8.1×1 topic
- Health Systems216▲ 8.1×1 topic
Sudan
- Climate Resilience
- Conflict
- Critical Thinking Skills
- Drug Resistance
- Vaccine Development
- Global Burden
- Vaccine
- Pathogenesis
- Diabetes
- Local Wisdom
- Pandemic
- E-Learning
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Character Education
- COVID-19
- Diagnosis
- Treatment
- Curriculum Development
- Climate Change
- Inflammation
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Public Health
- Globalization
- Digital Learning
- Oxidative Stress
- Antioxidant
- Educational Technology
- Immune Response
- Online Learning
- STEM Education
- Mobile Learning
- Genetic Diversity
- Islamic Education
- Antioxidant Activity
- Media Literacy
- Sustainable Agriculture
- 21st Century Skills
- Teacher Performance
- Character Development
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology709▲ 2.0×135 topics
- Inflammation266▲ 1.42×83 topics
- Machine Learning258◆ 0.88×87 topics
- Climate Change240◆ 1.01×103 topics
- Public Health220▲ 1.72×58 topics
- Curriculum Development203▲ 3.4×17 topics
- Globalization201▲ 1.16×83 topics
- Treatment197▲ 1.85×51 topics
- Digital Learning195▲ 4.3×12 topics
- Diagnosis193▲ 2.4×41 topics
- Oxidative Stress178▲ 1.23×62 topics
- COVID-19176▲ 1.54×31 topics
- Antioxidant165▲ 2.7×51 topics
- Character Education164▲ 3.9×6 topics
- Educational Technology161▲ 1.55×37 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease158▲ 1.58×39 topics
- Immune Response152▲ 3.0×23 topics
- E-Learning150▲ 1.77×24 topics
- Online Learning149▲ 2.0×23 topics
- Pandemic148▲ 1.69×14 topics
- STEM Education146▲ 3.7×15 topics
- Local Wisdom143▲ 3.5×9 topics
- Mobile Learning143▲ 4.8×6 topics
- Diabetes142▲ 3.2×22 topics
- Genetic Diversity132▲ 3.5×21 topics
- Pathogenesis128▲ 2.9×24 topics
- Islamic Education126▲ 4.3×4 topics
- Vaccine125▲ 3.6×11 topics
- Antioxidant Activity124▲ 2.3×31 topics
- Global Burden115▲ 2.4×12 topics
- Media Literacy113▲ 2.4×5 topics
- Vaccine Development99▲ 4.4×11 topics
- Sustainable Agriculture95▲ 3.5×13 topics
- Drug Resistance95▲ 3.8×9 topics
- 21st Century Skills89▲ 3.5×6 topics
- Critical Thinking Skills82▲ 5.4×2 topics
- Teacher Performance76▲ 6.2×2 topics
- Conflict75▲ 5.3×8 topics
- Character Development74▲ 5.2×2 topics
- Climate Resilience62▲ 12×3 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Nepal has out-published Sudan every year since 1993, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0000
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Nepal or Sudan?
Nepal publishes 4.3× as much research as Sudan in 2022-now (33k against 7.7k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Nepal or Sudan?
7.1% of Sudan's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 4.8% for Nepal.
Is Nepal or Sudan growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +54% against 2018-21 for Nepal, and +22% for Sudan.
Which has more open access research, Nepal or Sudan?
76% of Nepal's research is free to read, against 65% of Sudan's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Nepal or Sudan?
Nepal holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Sudan 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Nepal
- 1Tribhuvan University4.7% top 10% · 16k works
- 2College of Medical Sciences4.8% top 10% · 558 works
- 3Nepal Development Research Institute8.8% top 10% · 409 works
- 4Pokhara University5.3% top 10% · 1.6k works
- 5Purbanchal University6.5% top 10% · 334 works
- 6Agriculture and Forestry University5.3% top 10% · 1.4k works
Sudan
- 1National University16.3% top 10% · 260 works
- 2University of Khartoum7.8% top 10% · 1.3k works
- 3Sudan Meteorological Authority7.3% top 10% · 720 works
- 4University of Gezira7.4% top 10% · 539 works
- 5Sudan University of Science and Technology6.8% top 10% · 573 works
- 6Al-Neelain University5.9% top 10% · 362 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Nepal
- 1 Meghnath Dhimal #20,212 worldwide 83k citations · 338 works
- 2 Arun Bhakta Shrestha #60,021 worldwide 17k citations · 187 works
- 3 Mandira Lamichhane Dhimal #65,202 worldwide 21k citations · 63 works
- 4 Krishna Kumar Aryal #72,386 worldwide 11k citations · 105 works
- 5 Santosh Nepal #88,994 worldwide 6.7k citations · 130 works
Sudan
- 1 Ayman Ahmed #17,030 worldwide 35k citations · 288 works
- 2 Nouh Saad Mohamed #38,344 worldwide 35k citations · 192 works
- 3 Emmanuel Edwar Siddig #68,313 worldwide 30k citations · 300 works
- 4 Ahmed ElSayed #171,188 worldwide 5.3k citations · 55 works
- 5 Hytham K. S. Hamid #277,816 worldwide 2.5k citations · 139 works