- World rank, all time
- #25,296 of 34,923
- Rank in United States
- #5,283 of 7,310
- Research works
- 139 ▼ 40% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 4k 28.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.1% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.97× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 36% world 40%
- International
- 15% world 18%
Which fields of science does Circle Park work in?
In all years, 42% of research at Circle Park is in Physical Sciences, 40% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (22%), Computer Science (12%), Engineering (8%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 24 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences5942.5%
- Computer Science1712.1%
- Engineering128.5%
- Environmental Science106.9%
- Physics and Astronomy64.7%
- Materials Science43.0%
- Chemistry42.6%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences32.3%
- Mathematics32.0%
- Energy00.3%
- Chemical Engineering00.2%
- Social Sciences5539.8%
- Life Sciences1813.1%
- Health Sciences64.6%
- Medicine42.9%
- Health Professions21.5%
- Nursing00.3%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Mathematics, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 20 fields, with their numbers
- Mathematics5.41×1 works
- Decision Sciences3.76×1 works
- Physics and Astronomy2.47×1 works
- Psychology2.41×2 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.01×2 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.95×2 works
- Materials Science1.59×1 works
- Nursing1.35×0 works
- Arts and Humanities1.32×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.25×1 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.14×0 works
- Energy0.92×0 works
- Health Professions0.91×0 works
- Environmental Science0.85×1 works
- Chemistry0.81×0 works
- Neuroscience0.78×0 works
- Social Sciences0.77×2 works
- Computer Science0.54×1 works
- Engineering0.53×2 works
- Medicine0.49×2 works
- Mathematics 5.4×
- Decision Sciences 3.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 2.5×
- Psychology 2.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2.0×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.9×
- Materials Science 1.6×
- Nursing 1.4×
- Arts and Humanities 1.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.1×
- Energy 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.9×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Chemistry 0.8×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Medicine 0.5×
Which keywords describe research at Circle Park?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Social Media, Digital Divide, Trust, Social Capital, Online Communication, Academic Libraries, Community Engagement and Stakeholder Engagement.
- Virtual Communities
- Semantic Web
- Cultural Competence
- User Behavior
- Scientific Data Management
- Information Quality
- Dark Matter
- Ecology
- Motivation
- Knowledge Sharing
- Bibliometric Analysis
- Political Participation
- Information Technology
- Civic Engagement
- Information Retrieval
- Crisis Communication
- Invasive Species
- Community Engagement
- Social Capital
- Digital Divide
- Social Media
- Trust
- Academic Libraries
- Online Communication
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Public Relations
- Digital Literacy
- Digital Repositories
- Interdisciplinary Research
- Accountability
- Deliberative Democracy
- Media Use
- Research Evaluation
- Data Integration
- Data Sharing
- Particle Physics
- Search Engines
- Collaboration
- Diversity
- User-Centered Design
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Social Media12▲ 11×13 topics
- Digital Divide5▲ 18×6 topics
- Trust4▲ 12×7 topics
- Social Capital4▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Academic Libraries3▲ 47×3 topics
- Community Engagement3▲ 7.5×4 topics
- Online Communication3▲ 21×3 topics
- Invasive Species3▲ 3.7×6 topics
- Stakeholder Engagement3▲ 30×2 topics
- Crisis Communication3▲ 86×1 topic
- Public Relations3▲ 109×1 topic
- Information Retrieval3▲ 13×3 topics
- Digital Literacy2▲ 6.1×3 topics
- Civic Engagement2▲ 17×3 topics
- Digital Repositories2▲ 65×2 topics
- Information Technology2▲ 5.4×2 topics
- Interdisciplinary Research2▲ 21×2 topics
- Political Participation2▲ 20×2 topics
- Accountability2▲ 24×2 topics
- Bibliometric Analysis2▲ 35×1 topic
- Deliberative Democracy2▲ 24×1 topic
- Knowledge Sharing2▲ 9.5×3 topics
- Media Use2▲ 34×1 topic
- Motivation2▲ 5.5×3 topics
- Research Evaluation2▲ 75×1 topic
- Ecology2▲ 7.3×2 topics
- Data Integration2▲ 6.0×4 topics
- Dark Matter2▲ 7.1×2 topics
- Data Sharing2▲ 69×1 topic
- Information Quality2▲ 28×2 topics
- Particle Physics2▲ 11×2 topics
- Scientific Data Management2▲ 88×1 topic
- Search Engines2▲ 161×1 topic
- User Behavior2▲ 161×1 topic
- Collaboration2▲ 19×3 topics
- Cultural Competence2▲ 10×3 topics
- Diversity2▲ 7.2×3 topics
- Semantic Web2▲ 8.8×4 topics
- User-Centered Design2▲ 35×3 topics
- Virtual Communities2▲ 33×2 topics
Which research topics does Circle Park publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials, Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques and Digital and Traditional Archives Management.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 RNA Interference and Gene Delivery Molecular Biology 1 works
- 2 Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials Biomaterials 0 works
- 3 Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques Molecular Biology 0 works
- 4 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 0 works
- 5 scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
- 6 Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics Biomedical Engineering 0 works
- 7 Agricultural Innovations and Practices General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0 works
- 8 Particle Detector Development and Performance Nuclear and High Energy Physics 0 works
- 9 Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies Nuclear and High Energy Physics 0 works
- 10 Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior Social Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Circle Park's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 40% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Circle Park as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000068% in 2024.
Fractional works of Circle Park over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Florence
- Francis Marion University
- ScienceSouth
- Florence–Darlington Technical College
- HopeHealth
- Carolinas Hospital System
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Circle Park. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
