Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Tucson · United States

Critical Path Institute

In research, Critical Path Institute stands highest in Health Sciences (#10,992 of 20,462 worldwide), over all time.

c-path.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#14,446
of 28,054 · #15,685 all time
Rank in United States
#2,024
of 4,192
Research works
267
▲ 16% vs 2013–17
Citations
6.7k
25.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
24.1%
record average 16.5%
Open access
48%
world 28%

What is Critical Path Institute known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #10,992 of 20,462 23.0%131

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Critical Path Institute sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.84× its world share, 11 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.20× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.86× its world share, 2 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2.21× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 1.31× its world share, 7 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.12× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.24× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 2.48× its world share, 2 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 2.47× its world share, 5 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.16× its world share, 30 worksMedicineNursing: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 3.19× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 5.71× its world share, 4 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.13× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.89× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.10× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 5.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Critical Path Institute?

Ranked on the composite score, Diane Stephenson and Klaus Romero lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Critical Path Institute.

  1. 1 Diane Stephenson United States · #542,850 worldwide 36 citations · 17 works
  2. 2 Klaus Romero United States · #746,390 worldwide 34 citations · 20 works
All ranked researchers at Critical Path Institute

Which keywords describe research at Critical Path Institute?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Machine Learning, Precision Medicine, Predictive Modeling, Medical Imaging, Feature Extraction, Quantitative Analysis, Radiomics and Parkinson's Disease.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Machine Learning12▲ 5.0×15 topics
  2. Precision Medicine6▲ 17×6 topics
  3. Deep Learning5▲ 1.99×13 topics
  4. Predictive Modeling5▲ 25×2 topics
  5. Medical Imaging5▲ 12×3 topics
  6. Epidemiology4▲ 1.52×30 topics
  7. Feature Extraction4▲ 12×2 topics
  8. Quantitative Analysis4▲ 27×1 topic
  9. Radiomics4▲ 47×1 topic
  10. Oxidative Stress4▲ 3.2×13 topics
  11. Quality of Life4▲ 3.4×8 topics
  12. Biomarkers3▲ 5.8×7 topics
  13. Clinical Trials3▲ 5.8×7 topics
  14. Healthcare3▲ 3.4×5 topics
  15. Parkinson's Disease3▲ 16×6 topics
  16. Cost-effectiveness Analysis2▲ 40×1 topic
  17. Health Utility Measures2▲ 40×1 topic
  18. Mitochondrial Dysfunction2▲ 11×8 topics
  19. Gene Expression2▲ 5.1×6 topics
  20. Neurodegeneration2▲ 10×5 topics
  21. Immunotherapy2▲ 4.0×8 topics
  22. Targeted Therapy2▲ 13×3 topics
  23. Bayesian Methods2▲ 52×2 topics
  24. Data Integration2▲ 16×4 topics
  25. Medical Image Analysis2▲ 14×2 topics
  26. Pharmacokinetics2▲ 10.0×3 topics
  27. Type 1 Diabetes2▲ 32×2 topics
  28. Adaptive Designs2▲ 120×1 topic
  29. Computer-Aided Detection2▲ 28×1 topic
  30. Dopaminergic Neurons2▲ 39×2 topics
  31. False Discovery Rate2▲ 120×1 topic
  32. Histopathology Images2▲ 28×1 topic
  33. Quality Assessment2▲ 14×3 topics
  34. Electronic Health Records2▲ 25×2 topics
  35. Health Equity2▲ 8.5×2 topics
  36. Molecular Docking2▲ 18×1 topic
  37. Virtual Screening2▲ 25×1 topic
  38. Forecasting2▲ 12×2 topics
  39. Publication Bias2▲ 51×2 topics
  40. Semantic Web2▲ 24×2 topics

Which research topics does Critical Path Institute publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, AI in cancer detection and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials.

Radiomics and Machine Le…4Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 4 fractional worksHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life: 2 fractional worksAI in cancer detection2AI in cancer detection: 2 fractional worksStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials: 2 fractional worksComputational Drug Discovery Methods: 2 fractional worksCancer Genomics and Diagnostics: 2 fractional worksParkinson's Disease Mech…1Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments: 1 fractional worksMeta-analysis and systematic reviews: 1 fractional worksBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies: 1 fractional worksPsychometric Methodologi…1Psychometric Methodologies and Testing: 1 fractional works
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingEconomics and EconometricsArtificial IntelligenceStatistics and Probability6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 4 works
  2. 2 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 2 works
  3. 3 AI in cancer detection Artificial Intelligence 2 works
  4. 4 Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistics and Probability 2 works
  5. 5 Computational Drug Discovery Methods Computational Theory and Mathematics 2 works
  6. 6 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Research 2 works
  7. 7 Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments Neurology 1 works
  8. 8 Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1 works
  9. 9 Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies Molecular Biology 1 works
  10. 10 Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Management Science and Operations Research 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available48.1%not open51.9%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors32.5%domestic only67.5%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Critical Path Institute's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 16% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Tucson

All research institutions in Tucson

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.