Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Education

Innovative Educational Techniques

Innovative Educational Techniques is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 17k research works in it since 1954. 3.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to education, leadership, and complex systems. It includes research on teaching methodologies, supply chain management, healthcare, digital learning, artificial intelligence, logistics, and border security. The papers explore the impact of various teaching models on student performance, the application of AI in education, and the challenges and innovations in healthcare supply chains.

  • Leadership
  • Education
  • Teaching Methodology
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Healthcare
  • Student Performance
  • Digital Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Logistics
  • Border Security
Research works
17k
fractional, since 1954
In the world top 10%
605
per year above
Top-10% rate
3.6%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-11%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Innovative Educational Techniques research?

By volume, China and Ukraine publish the most (2.5k and 225 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 2.5k works
  2. 2 Ukraine 225 works
  3. 3 ?? 97 works
  4. 4 United States 91 works
  5. 5 Indonesia 79 works
  6. 6 Malaysia 57 works
  7. 7 Russia 57 works
  8. 8 Philippines 51 works
  9. 9 Vietnam 46 works
  10. 10 Thailand 40 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 77.2%Ukraine: 6.9%??: 3.0%United States: 2.8%6 others listed: 10.1%77%largest
China2,511 · 77.2%Ukraine225 · 6.9%??97 · 3.0%United States91 · 2.8%6 others listed329 · 10.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Innovative Educational Techniques research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Jiangsu Maritime Institute publishes the most Innovative Educational Techniques research, followed by National University of Defense Technology and Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Jiangsu Maritime Institute China 27 works
  2. 2 National University of Defense Technology China 24 works
  3. 3 Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine ?? 24 works
  4. 4 Taishan University China 24 works
  5. 5 Shandong Institute of Commerce & Technology China 19 works
  6. 6 Anhui University of Finance and Economics China 16 works
  7. 7 Wuhan Business University China 16 works
  8. 8 Shandong Normal University China 16 works
  9. 9 Wenzhou Polytechnic China 16 works
  10. 10 Shandong Xiehe University China 15 works

Where is Innovative Educational Techniques research done?

The largest centres of Innovative Educational Techniques research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Wuhan (China), Jinan (China) and Xi'an (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Khmelnytskyi.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 169 works
  2. 2 Wuhan China 138 works
  3. 3 Jinan China 116 works
  4. 4 Xi'an China 111 works
  5. 5 Guangzhou China 109 works
  6. 6 Shanghai China 102 works
  7. 7 Nanjing China 101 works
  8. 8 Kyiv Ukraine 89 works
  9. 9 Chongqing China 73 works
  10. 10 Chengdu China 61 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Khmelnytskyi25.8 works171×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Innovative Educational Techniques than the world average.

See Innovative Educational Techniques on the map

Where is the best place to study Innovative Educational Techniques?

Among universities, judged by research, Beijing Polytechnic, Zhejiang Yuexiu University and Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 13.92%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Beijing Polytechnic: 14, 26.8%Zhejiang Yuexiu University: 8, 35.6%Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine: 24, 6.5%Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power: 10, 20.3%Linyi University: 8, 15.9%Bohai University: 8, 12.5%Taishan University: 24, 2.6%Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts: 11, 10.3%National University of Defense Technology: 24, 7.5%Jiangsu Maritime Institute: 27, 1.2%Zhejiang Yuexiu Univ…Beijing PolytechnicJiangxi University o…Bohdan Khmelnytskyi …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Beijing Polytechnic China 63.426.8%107.7×14 —
2Zhejiang Yuexiu University ?? 58.935.6%104.4×8 -16.7%
3Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine ?? 54.66.5%215.5×24 —
4Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power China 54.320.3%42.7×10 +63.6%
5Linyi University China 53.815.9%22.0×8 +163.5%
6Bohai University China 51.412.5%23.0×8 +267.3%
7Taishan University China 49.52.6%125.6×24 +13.3%
8Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts Ukraine 48.310.3%52.8×11 —
9National University of Defense Technology China 47.87.5%9.2×24 -77.4%
10Jiangsu Maritime Institute China 46.51.2%316.8×27 -60.5%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Innovative Educational Techniques research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 11% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.