Argentina vs Poland
On research quality in 2022-now, Poland ranks #23 in the world and Argentina #38, of 189 countries. Argentina stands higher in 1 of the 26 fields both publish in, Poland in 25.
Research profiles alike: 0.57similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Argentina
- World rank, 2022-now
- #38
- #37 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 79k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 5.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 62%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Social Sciences, Paleontology, General Arts and Humanities.
Poland
- World rank, 2022-now
- #23
- #28 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 250k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 9.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 49%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Linguistics and Language, General Social Sciences, History.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Poland leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate and growth. Argentina leads on 3 of 9 measures: citations per work, open access and international co-authorship. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #38Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#23
- 0.67×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.93×
- 79kOutputfractional works, 2022-now250k
- 5.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited9.2%
- 11.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work9.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 62%Open accessof its works free to read, all time49%
- 20%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time13%
- -15%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change-11%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Argentina stands higher in 1 of 26 fields, Poland in 25. Poland leads most in Materials Science (#17 against #57); Argentina leads most in Earth and Planetary Sciences (#33 against #35). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #32Agricultural and Biological Sciences#21
- #27Arts and Humanities#19
- #36Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#25
- #60Business, Management and Accounting#25
- -Chemical Engineering#25
- #45Chemistry#17
- #52Computer Science#23
- #52Decision Sciences#30
- #46Dentistry#18
- #33Earth and Planetary Sciences#35
- #45Economics, Econometrics and Finance#21
- #50Energy#22
- #55Engineering#25
- #42Environmental Science#28
- #43Health Professions#28
- #34Immunology and Microbiology#30
- #57Materials Science#17
- #34Mathematics#24
- #37Medicine#29
- #32Neuroscience#29
- #32Nursing#21
- #33Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#18
- #40Physics and Astronomy#23
- #36Psychology#30
- #28Social Sciences#24
- #22Veterinary#16
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Argentina rank | Poland rank | Argentina top 10% | Poland top 10% | Argentina works | Poland works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #32 | #21 | 6.0% | 11.8% | 6.7k | 12k |
| Arts and Humanities | #27 | #19 | 8.0% | 9.8% | 6k | 17k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #36 | #25 | 5.3% | 9.3% | 3.8k | 12k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #60 | #25 | 4.8% | 8.7% | 1.2k | 7.4k |
| Chemical Engineering | - | #25 | - | 7.2% | - | 905 |
| Chemistry | #45 | #17 | 4.8% | 9.0% | 970 | 4.5k |
| Computer Science | #52 | #23 | 4.5% | 8.1% | 3k | 11k |
| Decision Sciences | #52 | #30 | 5.4% | 8.1% | 302 | 1.7k |
| Dentistry | #46 | #18 | 3.3% | 20.1% | 269 | 965 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #33 | #35 | 5.2% | 7.1% | 2.2k | 3.3k |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #45 | #21 | 6.3% | 8.5% | 1.3k | 6.7k |
| Energy | #50 | #22 | 4.5% | 10.1% | 503 | 2.1k |
| Engineering | #55 | #25 | 3.8% | 8.3% | 4.1k | 32k |
| Environmental Science | #42 | #28 | 5.2% | 9.0% | 5.5k | 12k |
| Health Professions | #43 | #28 | 6.0% | 10.4% | 1.8k | 3.7k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #34 | #30 | 6.8% | 9.9% | 832 | 2.1k |
| Materials Science | #57 | #17 | 3.5% | 7.2% | 1.5k | 8.7k |
| Mathematics | #34 | #24 | 7.8% | 8.1% | 719 | 2.9k |
| Medicine | #37 | #29 | 5.5% | 10.5% | 13k | 40k |
| Neuroscience | #32 | #29 | 5.4% | 8.9% | 1k | 3.4k |
| Nursing | #32 | #21 | 5.3% | 12.0% | 456 | 1.3k |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #33 | #18 | 6.4% | 12.5% | 216 | 779 |
| Physics and Astronomy | #40 | #23 | 4.9% | 7.3% | 1.7k | 5.6k |
| Psychology | #36 | #30 | 5.5% | 8.2% | 2.8k | 7k |
| Social Sciences | #28 | #24 | 6.7% | 8.7% | 19k | 50k |
| Veterinary | #22 | #16 | 5.8% | 10.4% | 222 | 359 |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Argentina
- Protest
- Political Violence
- Welfare State
- Economy
- Feminism
- Biogeography
- Public Policy
- Philosophy
- Inequality
- Colonialism
- Cultural Studies
- Social Inequality
- Innovation
- Biodiversity
- Identity
- Gender
- Social Movements
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Globalization
- Education
- Latin America
- History
- Sustainability
- Human Rights
- Cultural Identity
- Neoliberalism
- Ethics
- Literature
- Memory
- Invasive Species
- Communication
- Politics
- Society
- Community Participation
- Violence
- Molecular Phylogeny
- Resistance
- Cultural
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization5,661▲ 3.3×167 topics
- Climate Change4,461▲ 1.87×123 topics
- Education4,214▲ 2.8×141 topics
- Epidemiology4,167▲ 1.19×140 topics
- Latin America3,932▲ 24×23 topics
- Public Health2,816▲ 2.2×75 topics
- History2,786▲ 4.6×64 topics
- Social Movements2,751▲ 11×32 topics
- Sustainability2,654▲ 1.24×124 topics
- Gender2,566▲ 5.4×56 topics
- Human Rights2,376▲ 2.6×84 topics
- Identity1,909▲ 3.0×75 topics
- Cultural Identity1,864▲ 4.3×36 topics
- Biodiversity1,796▲ 2.7×37 topics
- Neoliberalism1,740▲ 5.5×30 topics
- Innovation1,697▲ 1.87×74 topics
- Ethics1,695▲ 3.8×59 topics
- Social Inequality1,673▲ 7.1×21 topics
- Literature1,623▲ 3.4×59 topics
- Cultural Studies1,567▲ 4.8×39 topics
- Memory1,556▲ 7.2×23 topics
- Colonialism1,446▲ 3.5×49 topics
- Invasive Species1,426▲ 3.8×21 topics
- Inequality1,394▲ 7.0×19 topics
- Communication1,383▲ 5.0×23 topics
- Philosophy1,347▲ 3.5×44 topics
- Politics1,316▲ 5.7×24 topics
- Public Policy1,293▲ 3.1×29 topics
- Society1,260▲ 7.5×26 topics
- Biogeography1,167▲ 4.8×20 topics
- Community Participation1,145▲ 3.7×18 topics
- Feminism1,125▲ 4.4×26 topics
- Violence1,050▲ 8.1×15 topics
- Economy1,023▲ 15×8 topics
- Molecular Phylogeny927▲ 6.4×12 topics
- Welfare State912▲ 13×4 topics
- Resistance885▲ 10.0×9 topics
- Political Violence883▲ 39×3 topics
- Cultural822▲ 19×7 topics
- Protest816▲ 24×3 topics
Poland
- Anthropology
- Historiography
- Social Change
- Digital Innovations
- European Union Law
- Ethnolinguistics
- Social Sciences
- Translation
- Multilingualism
- Language
- Sociolinguistics
- Ethics
- Polish history
- Cultural Identity
- Soviet Union
- Literature
- Ethnography
- Nationalism
- European Union
- Education
- Globalization
- Cultural Studies
- Human Rights
- Migration
- Innovation
- Eastern Europe
- Pedagogy
- Cultural Discourse
- Polish minority
- Cultural Heritage
- Culture
- Urban Development
- Lexicography
- Media Discourse
- Lifelong Learning
- Public Administration
- Youth Development
- National Identity
- Data Privacy
- Memory Studies
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization11k▲ 2.1×185 topics
- Education10k▲ 2.2×159 topics
- Cultural Studies7,244▲ 7.1×45 topics
- European Union7,132▲ 12×29 topics
- Human Rights6,479▲ 2.3×90 topics
- Nationalism6,245▲ 5.0×34 topics
- Migration6,012▲ 6.4×35 topics
- Ethnography5,863▲ 12×16 topics
- Innovation5,612▲ 1.97×90 topics
- Literature5,338▲ 3.5×64 topics
- Eastern Europe5,308▲ 37×3 topics
- Soviet Union5,301▲ 35×3 topics
- Pedagogy4,873▲ 3.5×30 topics
- Cultural Identity4,864▲ 3.5×40 topics
- Cultural Discourse4,864▲ 49×3 topics
- Polish history4,844▲ 71×1 topic
- Polish minority4,844▲ 71×1 topic
- Ethics4,813▲ 3.4×62 topics
- Cultural Heritage4,748▲ 3.2×40 topics
- Sociolinguistics4,605▲ 9.1×9 topics
- Culture4,528▲ 3.1×40 topics
- Language4,404▲ 6.4×15 topics
- Urban Development4,401▲ 4.5×23 topics
- Multilingualism4,107▲ 9.2×6 topics
- Lexicography4,106▲ 17×5 topics
- Translation4,103▲ 9.0×7 topics
- Media Discourse3,674▲ 21×4 topics
- Social Sciences3,670▲ 9.2×24 topics
- Lifelong Learning3,640▲ 6.4×11 topics
- Ethnolinguistics3,637▲ 44×2 topics
- Public Administration3,554▲ 16×6 topics
- European Union Law3,482▲ 79×2 topics
- Youth Development3,383▲ 13×9 topics
- Digital Innovations3,236▲ 81×1 topic
- National Identity3,110▲ 9.7×11 topics
- Social Change3,067▲ 9.0×21 topics
- Data Privacy2,893▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Historiography2,859▲ 8.5×15 topics
- Memory Studies2,850▲ 16×6 topics
- Anthropology2,767▲ 11×11 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Poland has out-published Argentina every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5001
- 2In the top 1,0005
- #35Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#29
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Argentina or Poland?
Poland publishes 3.2× as much research as Argentina in 2022-now (250k against 79k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Argentina or Poland?
9.2% of Poland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 5.8% for Argentina.
Is Argentina or Poland growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was -11% against 2018-21 for Poland, and -15% for Argentina.
Which has more open access research, Argentina or Poland?
62% of Argentina's research is free to read, against 49% of Poland's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Argentina or Poland?
Argentina holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Poland 0; in the top 1,000 it is 2 against 5.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Argentina
- 1Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas6.8% top 10% · 21k works
- 2Universidad de Buenos Aires6.1% top 10% · 8.5k works
- 3Universidad Nacional de Cuyo6.6% top 10% · 1.2k works
- 4Universidad Nacional de La Plata5.3% top 10% · 4k works
- 5National University of General San Martín7.3% top 10% · 906 works
- 6Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina7.0% top 10% · 876 works
Poland
- 1Polish Academy of Sciences9.4% top 10% · 21k works
- 2Jagiellonian University8.7% top 10% · 14k works
- 3University of Warsaw8.8% top 10% · 11k works
- 4AGH University of Krakow9.1% top 10% · 8k works
- 5University of Wrocław7.6% top 10% · 4.2k works
- 6Wrocław University of Science and Technology8.6% top 10% · 3.4k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Argentina
- 1 Rafael Ugarriza Díaz #1,505 worldwide 80k citations · 380 works
- 2 Enzo Tagliazucchi #4,405 worldwide 15k citations · 294 works
- 3 Osvaldo E. Sala #6,469 worldwide 55k citations · 325 works
- 4 Sandra M. Díaz #7,348 worldwide 83k citations · 374 works
- 5 G. Farrar #18,089 worldwide 10k citations · 105 works
Poland
- 1 P. Jaranowski #637 worldwide 94k citations · 375 works
- 2 T. Kunigo #1,235 worldwide 24k citations · 283 works
- 3 N. Haddad #1,253 worldwide 21k citations · 240 works
- 4 O. Arslan #1,266 worldwide 42k citations · 484 works
- 5 M. Lisovyi #1,357 worldwide 65k citations · 863 works
Other comparisons
Israelvs
Poland
Norwayvs
Poland
Finlandvs
Poland
Polandvs
Taiwan
New Zealandvs
Poland
Czechiavs
Poland
Argentinavs
Luxembourg
Argentinavs
Slovenia
United Arab Emiratesvs
Argentina
Argentinavs
Thailand
Argentinavs
Bangladesh