Latvia vs Philippines
On research quality in 2022-now, The Philippines ranks #68 in the world and Latvia #71, of 189 countries. Latvia stands higher in 5 of the 22 fields both publish in, the Philippines in 17.
Research profiles alike: 0.49similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Latvia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #71
- #97 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 13k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 6.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 57%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance.
Philippines
- World rank, 2022-now
- #68
- #60 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 56k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 5.8%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 64%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Leadership and Management, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Research and Theory.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Latvia leads on 4 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and international co-authorship. The Philippines leads on 4 of 9 measures: research quality, output, open access and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #71Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#68
- 0.66×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.49×
- 13kOutputfractional works, 2022-now56k
- 6.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited5.8%
- 9.4Citations per workall time, per fractional work7.6
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 57%Open accessof its works free to read, all time64%
- 30%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time20%
- +3%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+102%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Latvia stands higher in 5 of 22 fields, Philippines in 17. The Philippines leads most in Social Sciences (#53 against #81); Latvia leads most in Materials Science (#61 against #67). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #75Agricultural and Biological Sciences#65
- #61Arts and Humanities#54
- #71Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#73
- #65Business, Management and Accounting#70
- -Chemistry#57
- #68Computer Science#53
- -Decision Sciences#54
- -Earth and Planetary Sciences#61
- #72Economics, Econometrics and Finance#66
- -Energy#65
- #68Engineering#73
- #90Environmental Science#77
- #77Health Professions#59
- -Immunology and Microbiology#57
- #61Materials Science#67
- -Mathematics#62
- #71Medicine#74
- -Neuroscience#45
- -Nursing#50
- -Physics and Astronomy#65
- #72Psychology#57
- #81Social Sciences#53
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Latvia rank | Philippines rank | Latvia top 10% | Philippines top 10% | Latvia works | Philippines works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #75 | #65 | 7.0% | 4.7% | 829 | 3.8k |
| Arts and Humanities | #61 | #54 | 8.9% | 7.9% | 458 | 1.9k |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #71 | #73 | 5.3% | 4.3% | 487 | 1.3k |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #65 | #70 | 8.1% | 4.6% | 924 | 3.2k |
| Chemistry | - | #57 | - | 3.9% | - | 344 |
| Computer Science | #68 | #53 | 6.9% | 6.6% | 828 | 5.8k |
| Decision Sciences | - | #54 | - | 4.7% | - | 934 |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | - | #61 | - | 4.4% | - | 476 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #72 | #66 | 7.6% | 6.5% | 626 | 1.4k |
| Energy | - | #65 | - | 4.4% | - | 263 |
| Engineering | #68 | #73 | 5.4% | 3.3% | 1.9k | 4.3k |
| Environmental Science | #90 | #77 | 5.3% | 4.0% | 863 | 3.2k |
| Health Professions | #77 | #59 | 9.1% | 7.5% | 265 | 1.9k |
| Immunology and Microbiology | - | #57 | - | 4.7% | - | 287 |
| Materials Science | #61 | #67 | 4.8% | 4.4% | 451 | 523 |
| Mathematics | - | #62 | - | 8.4% | - | 619 |
| Medicine | #71 | #74 | 7.8% | 4.8% | 1.4k | 5.9k |
| Neuroscience | - | #45 | - | 4.5% | - | 361 |
| Nursing | - | #50 | - | 3.2% | - | 367 |
| Physics and Astronomy | - | #65 | - | 6.7% | - | 279 |
| Psychology | #72 | #57 | 6.2% | 4.2% | 393 | 3.7k |
| Social Sciences | #81 | #53 | 7.7% | 7.7% | 2.4k | 15k |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Latvia
- Environmental Protection
- Resource Efficiency
- Postcolonial Theory
- Cold War
- Life Cycle Assessment
- Soviet Union
- Global Governance
- European Integration
- Digital Transformation
- European Union
- Corporate Governance
- Big Data
- Environmental Management
- Education
- Energy Efficiency
- Innovation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Renewable Energy
- Human Rights
- Sustainable Development
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Globalization
- Environmental Impact
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Economic Development
- Supply Chain Management
- Economic Growth
- International Law
- Social Capital
- International Relations
- Entrepreneurship
- Legal Regulation
- Criminal Justice
- Diplomacy
- Eastern Europe
- Cultural Integration
- Australia
- Financial Security
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability717▲ 2.0×112 topics
- Sustainable Development539▲ 2.3×96 topics
- Climate Change538▲ 1.35×116 topics
- Human Rights509▲ 3.4×76 topics
- Globalization452▲ 1.56×140 topics
- Renewable Energy451▲ 2.1×56 topics
- Environmental Impact389▲ 1.55×69 topics
- Artificial Intelligence388▲ 1.85×60 topics
- Machine Learning385▼ 0.79×87 topics
- Innovation379▲ 2.5×75 topics
- Epidemiology361▼ 0.62×133 topics
- Energy Efficiency304▲ 2.2×43 topics
- Economic Development288▲ 2.5×46 topics
- Education281◆ 1.11×120 topics
- Supply Chain Management260▲ 1.97×24 topics
- Environmental Management254▲ 4.2×19 topics
- Economic Growth238▲ 1.99×33 topics
- Big Data228▲ 1.62×31 topics
- International Law208▲ 4.5×31 topics
- Corporate Governance206▲ 1.90×28 topics
- Social Capital203▲ 2.7×18 topics
- European Union198▲ 6.0×25 topics
- International Relations187▲ 5.2×25 topics
- Digital Transformation182▲ 2.3×28 topics
- Entrepreneurship176▲ 3.0×21 topics
- European Integration149▲ 18×5 topics
- Legal Regulation137▲ 4.2×8 topics
- Global Governance136▲ 3.9×25 topics
- Criminal Justice135▲ 4.1×8 topics
- Soviet Union129▲ 16×3 topics
- Diplomacy127▲ 9.3×7 topics
- Life Cycle Assessment122▲ 3.0×8 topics
- Eastern Europe118▲ 15×3 topics
- Cold War118▲ 13×5 topics
- Cultural Integration114▲ 3.6×3 topics
- Postcolonial Theory108▲ 28×3 topics
- Australia106▲ 45×1 topic
- Resource Efficiency100▲ 5.0×3 topics
- Financial Security98▲ 6.3×3 topics
- Environmental Protection93▲ 13×10 topics
Philippines
- Educational Leadership
- Academic Achievement
- Microlearning
- 21st Century Skills
- Lifelong Learning
- Biogeography
- Leadership
- Teaching Strategies
- Distance Learning
- Google Classroom
- Higher Education
- Professional Development
- Student Engagement
- Teacher Professional Development
- Artificial Intelligence
- Mobile Learning
- Sustainability
- Online Learning
- Education
- E-Learning
- Educational Technology
- Technology Integration
- Machine Learning
- Globalization
- Mental Health
- Sustainable Development
- Student Satisfaction
- Inclusive Education
- Digital Transformation
- Online Education
- Teacher Perception
- Virtual Classroom
- Health Education
- Social Capital
- Motivation
- STEM Education
- Job Satisfaction
- Self-Efficacy
- Phylogeny
- Taxonomy
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Educational Technology4,628▲ 5.5×47 topics
- E-Learning3,697▲ 5.4×27 topics
- Technology Integration3,446▲ 15×12 topics
- Education3,106▲ 2.5×152 topics
- Machine Learning3,005▲ 1.26×96 topics
- Online Learning2,867▲ 4.8×27 topics
- Globalization2,845▲ 2.0×172 topics
- Sustainability2,665▲ 1.52×135 topics
- Mental Health1,973▲ 1.93×48 topics
- Mobile Learning1,780▲ 7.3×6 topics
- Sustainable Development1,666▲ 1.49×110 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1,622▲ 1.59×66 topics
- Student Satisfaction1,621▲ 12×4 topics
- Teacher Professional Development1,551▲ 13×5 topics
- Inclusive Education1,550▲ 6.0×20 topics
- Student Engagement1,547▲ 5.4×17 topics
- Digital Transformation1,537▲ 4.0×32 topics
- Professional Development1,514▲ 10×15 topics
- Online Education1,393▲ 10×7 topics
- Higher Education1,319▲ 3.5×34 topics
- Teacher Perception1,245▲ 16×2 topics
- Google Classroom1,242▲ 17×1 topic
- Virtual Classroom1,242▲ 17×1 topic
- Distance Learning1,203▲ 4.8×14 topics
- Health Education1,148▲ 3.7×11 topics
- Teaching Strategies1,146▲ 5.7×7 topics
- Social Capital1,136▲ 3.1×21 topics
- Leadership1,135▲ 3.2×41 topics
- Motivation1,133▲ 3.8×12 topics
- Biogeography1,123▲ 5.6×20 topics
- STEM Education1,082▲ 3.3×16 topics
- Lifelong Learning1,067▲ 7.2×11 topics
- Job Satisfaction1,053▲ 3.3×15 topics
- 21st Century Skills1,012▲ 4.9×6 topics
- Self-Efficacy888▲ 4.8×11 topics
- Microlearning810▲ 50×1 topic
- Phylogeny798▲ 6.7×17 topics
- Academic Achievement778▲ 6.3×10 topics
- Taxonomy766▲ 7.4×15 topics
- Educational Leadership723▲ 8.0×4 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
The Philippines has out-published Latvia every year since 2012, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 0In the top 5000
- 0In the top 1,0001
- #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#48
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Latvia or Philippines?
The Philippines publishes 4.3× as much research as Latvia in 2022-now (56k against 13k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Latvia or Philippines?
6.8% of Latvia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 5.8% for the Philippines.
Is Latvia or Philippines growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +102% against 2018-21 for the Philippines, and +3% for Latvia.
Which has more open access research, Latvia or Philippines?
64% of the Philippines's research is free to read, against 57% of Latvia's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Latvia or Philippines?
Latvia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and the Philippines 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 1.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Latvia
- 1Riga Technical University5.8% top 10% · 2.3k works
- 2University of Latvia6.1% top 10% · 2.9k works
- 3College of Business Administration14.5% top 10% · 444 works
- 4College of Law5.7% top 10% · 1k works
- 5Riga Stradiņš University9.9% top 10% · 1k works
- 6Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies3.9% top 10% · 844 works
Philippines
- 1Northwestern University11.9% top 10% · 850 works
- 2De La Salle University6.5% top 10% · 2.6k works
- 3Cebu Technological University7.8% top 10% · 927 works
- 4Bulacan State University4.7% top 10% · 693 works
- 5Caraga State University4.7% top 10% · 721 works
- 6University of Mindanao6.9% top 10% · 1.1k works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Latvia
- 1 Andrejs Ērglis #117,746 worldwide 36k citations · 513 works
- 2 Kristaps Klavins #165,683 worldwide 3.6k citations · 104 works
- 3 Laima Tihomirova #186,734 worldwide 4.7k citations · 46 works
- 4 Liene Ņikitina-Zaķe #227,666 worldwide 18k citations · 108 works
- 5 Oskar Faix #233,046 worldwide 11k citations · 135 works
Philippines
- 1 Veincent Christian Filipino Pepito #10,461 worldwide 72k citations · 102 works
- 2 Jason Villota Chavez #12,774 worldwide 1.5k citations · 67 works
- 3 Liane Peña Alampay #24,239 worldwide 7.2k citations · 141 works
- 4 Reggie C. Pantig #27,163 worldwide 2.2k citations · 119 works
- 5 Nese Sreenivasulu #33,746 worldwide 13k citations · 242 works