Indonesia vs Montenegro
On research quality in 2022-now, Montenegro ranks #63 in the world and Indonesia #65, of 189 countries. Indonesia stands higher in 22 of the 26 fields both publish in, Montenegro in 4.
Research profiles alike: 0.35somewhat alike shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Indonesia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #65
- #66 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 1.6M
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 7.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 86%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Human Factors and Ergonomics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Demography.
Montenegro
- World rank, 2022-now
- #63
- #62 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 2.8k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 8.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 56%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, General Energy, Space and Planetary Science.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Montenegro leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and international co-authorship. Indonesia leads on 3 of 9 measures: output, open access and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #65Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#63
- 0.48×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.99×
- 1.6MOutputfractional works, 2022-now2.8k
- 7.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited8.4%
- 2.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.7
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 86%Open accessof its works free to read, all time56%
- 4%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time46%
- +65%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+17%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Indonesia stands higher in 22 of 26 fields, Montenegro in 4. Indonesia leads most in Social Sciences (#27 against #85); Montenegro leads most in Medicine (#70 against #129). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #59Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- #53Arts and Humanities-
- #96Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-
- #33Business, Management and Accounting-
- #41Chemical Engineering-
- #60Chemistry-
- #64Computer Science#56
- #64Decision Sciences-
- #59Dentistry-
- #62Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #59Economics, Econometrics and Finance-
- #70Energy-
- #87Engineering#58
- #74Environmental Science#59
- #51Health Professions-
- #69Immunology and Microbiology-
- #73Materials Science-
- #67Mathematics-
- #129Medicine#70
- #67Neuroscience-
- #56Nursing-
- #40Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #63Physics and Astronomy-
- #92Psychology-
- #27Social Sciences#85
- #28Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Indonesia rank | Montenegro rank | Indonesia top 10% | Montenegro top 10% | Indonesia works | Montenegro works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #59 | - | 6.7% | - | 125k | - |
| Arts and Humanities | #53 | - | 7.9% | - | 36k | - |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #96 | - | 1.9% | - | 13k | - |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #33 | - | 7.6% | - | 182k | - |
| Chemical Engineering | #41 | - | 2.7% | - | 663 | - |
| Chemistry | #60 | - | 2.4% | - | 4.6k | - |
| Computer Science | #64 | #56 | 8.1% | 9.1% | 176k | 249 |
| Decision Sciences | #64 | - | 2.8% | - | 11k | - |
| Dentistry | #59 | - | 1.6% | - | 2.7k | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #62 | - | 2.4% | - | 7.4k | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #59 | - | 7.0% | - | 40k | - |
| Energy | #70 | - | 2.6% | - | 3.4k | - |
| Engineering | #87 | #58 | 3.5% | 7.4% | 75k | 465 |
| Environmental Science | #74 | #59 | 6.3% | 9.6% | 55k | 201 |
| Health Professions | #51 | - | 7.9% | - | 68k | - |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #69 | - | 2.0% | - | 2.6k | - |
| Materials Science | #73 | - | 2.9% | - | 9k | - |
| Mathematics | #67 | - | 7.9% | - | 16k | - |
| Medicine | #129 | #70 | 5.2% | 7.3% | 95k | 332 |
| Neuroscience | #67 | - | 1.9% | - | 2.5k | - |
| Nursing | #56 | - | 2.0% | - | 5.6k | - |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #40 | - | 3.1% | - | 2.8k | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #63 | - | 3.7% | - | 1.6k | - |
| Psychology | #92 | - | 5.0% | - | 31k | - |
| Social Sciences | #27 | #85 | 8.8% | 6.2% | 613k | 303 |
| Veterinary | #28 | - | 3.2% | - | 313 | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Indonesia
- Breastfeeding
- Community Participation
- School Literacy Movement
- Information Literacy
- Learning Outcomes
- Health Education
- UMKM
- STEM Education
- SMEs
- Islamic Banking
- Corporate Governance
- Pandemic
- COVID-19
- Digital Learning
- Education
- E-commerce
- Indonesia
- Media Literacy
- Character Education
- Social Media
- Community Empowerment
- E-Learning
- Educational Technology
- Local Wisdom
- Curriculum Development
- Digital Literacy
- Financial Performance
- Sustainable Development
- Qualitative Research
- Online Learning
- Economic Impact
- Supply Chain Management
- Islamic Education
- Digital Marketing
- Mobile Learning
- Information Technology
- Pandemic Response
- Reading Interest
- Customer Satisfaction
- Public Health Policy
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Community Empowerment148k▲ 12×16 topics
- Social Media117k▲ 4.9×41 topics
- E-Learning112k▲ 6.7×27 topics
- Character Education108k▲ 13×6 topics
- Educational Technology107k▲ 5.2×48 topics
- Media Literacy106k▲ 12×6 topics
- Local Wisdom105k▲ 13×9 topics
- Indonesia97k▲ 13×5 topics
- Curriculum Development95k▲ 8.1×20 topics
- E-commerce94k▲ 9.6×11 topics
- Digital Literacy90k▲ 9.1×13 topics
- Education88k▲ 3.0×161 topics
- Financial Performance86k▲ 8.8×16 topics
- Digital Learning84k▲ 9.6×13 topics
- Sustainable Development84k▲ 3.1×113 topics
- COVID-1983k▲ 3.7×34 topics
- Qualitative Research83k▲ 5.6×45 topics
- Pandemic81k▲ 4.7×14 topics
- Online Learning80k▲ 5.6×27 topics
- Corporate Governance79k▲ 6.2×32 topics
- Economic Impact76k▲ 8.2×13 topics
- Islamic Banking71k▲ 11×3 topics
- Supply Chain Management65k▲ 4.2×27 topics
- SMEs64k▲ 11×5 topics
- Islamic Education64k▲ 11×4 topics
- STEM Education64k▲ 8.1×16 topics
- Digital Marketing63k▲ 9.4×6 topics
- UMKM62k▲ 13×1 topic
- Mobile Learning61k▲ 10×6 topics
- Health Education61k▲ 8.1×11 topics
- Information Technology53k▲ 6.4×32 topics
- Learning Outcomes52k▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Pandemic Response47k▲ 12×3 topics
- Information Literacy46k▲ 10×4 topics
- Reading Interest45k▲ 13×1 topic
- School Literacy Movement45k▲ 13×1 topic
- Customer Satisfaction45k▲ 8.1×10 topics
- Community Participation44k▲ 7.2×19 topics
- Public Health Policy42k▲ 9.3×4 topics
- Breastfeeding42k▲ 11×3 topics
Montenegro
- Yugoslavia
- Eastern Europe
- Rural Tourism
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Conflict
- Economic Diplomacy
- Commercial Diplomacy
- Negotiation
- Agricultural Sustainability
- International Trade
- Sovereign Debt Crises
- Regional Development
- Nationalism
- Religion
- Identity
- Biodiversity
- Economic Growth
- Renewable Energy
- Sustainability
- Deep Learning
- Climate Change
- Machine Learning
- Sustainable Development
- Neural Networks
- Environmental Impact
- Remote Sensing
- Biogeography
- Invasive Species
- International Relations
- Ethnicity
- Nation-Building
- Foreign Policy
- Taxonomy
- Phylogeny
- Ecology
- Innovation Management
- Balkans
- Leadership Emergence
- Mediterranean
- Post-war
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change171▲ 1.89×101 topics
- Deep Learning158▲ 1.38×79 topics
- Machine Learning119◆ 1.07×80 topics
- Sustainability106▲ 1.31×95 topics
- Sustainable Development87▲ 1.68×61 topics
- Renewable Energy80▲ 1.67×47 topics
- Neural Networks78▲ 1.53×40 topics
- Economic Growth77▲ 2.9×26 topics
- Environmental Impact74▲ 1.31×57 topics
- Biodiversity66▲ 2.6×31 topics
- Remote Sensing59▲ 1.46×36 topics
- Identity54▲ 2.2×37 topics
- Biogeography51▲ 5.5×20 topics
- Religion46▲ 3.0×24 topics
- Invasive Species46▲ 3.2×21 topics
- Nationalism43▲ 2.9×18 topics
- International Relations43▲ 5.3×18 topics
- Regional Development39▲ 3.4×14 topics
- Ethnicity39▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Sovereign Debt Crises38▲ 29×2 topics
- Nation-Building38▲ 22×4 topics
- International Trade38▲ 8.1×10 topics
- Foreign Policy38▲ 30×2 topics
- Agricultural Sustainability35▲ 9.2×5 topics
- Taxonomy34▲ 7.1×13 topics
- Negotiation34▲ 29×2 topics
- Phylogeny33▲ 6.0×16 topics
- Commercial Diplomacy33▲ 84×1 topic
- Ecology33▲ 5.8×9 topics
- Economic Diplomacy33▲ 84×1 topic
- Innovation Management33▲ 6.4×7 topics
- Conflict31▲ 5.8×7 topics
- Balkans31▲ 40×2 topics
- Small and Medium Enterprises29▲ 4.9×4 topics
- Leadership Emergence28▲ 61×1 topic
- Rural Tourism28▲ 27×1 topic
- Mediterranean27▲ 9.2×6 topics
- Eastern Europe27▲ 15×2 topics
- Post-war26▲ 68×1 topic
- Yugoslavia26▲ 68×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Indonesia has out-published Montenegro every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 1In the top 5000
- 14In the top 1,0000
- #19Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Indonesia or Montenegro?
Indonesia publishes 572.8× as much research as Montenegro in 2022-now (1.6M against 2.8k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Indonesia or Montenegro?
8.4% of Montenegro's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 7.4% for Indonesia.
Is Indonesia or Montenegro growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +65% against 2018-21 for Indonesia, and +17% for Montenegro.
Which has more open access research, Indonesia or Montenegro?
86% of Indonesia's research is free to read, against 56% of Montenegro's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Indonesia or Montenegro?
Indonesia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Montenegro 0; in the top 1,000 it is 14 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Indonesia
- 1Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu8.9% top 10% · 29k works
- 2Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara8.2% top 10% · 21k works
- 3Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya7.0% top 10% · 5.7k works
- 4Universitas Patria Artha7.2% top 10% · 16k works
- 5Indonesia University of Education10.9% top 10% · 21k works
- 6State University of Padang8.1% top 10% · 22k works
Montenegro
- 1Ministry of Education14.6% top 10% · 468 works
- 2University of Montenegro6.7% top 10% · 1.4k works
- 3Mediterranean University7.6% top 10% · 395 works
- 4University of Donja Gorica8.1% top 10% · 147 works
- 5Ministry of Science11.0% top 10% · 110 works
- 6Klinički Centar Crne Gore3.1% top 10% · 67 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Indonesia
- 1 Dian Palupi Kusuma #10,218 worldwide 82k citations · 164 works
- 2 Sven Wunder #14,885 worldwide 26k citations · 307 works
- 3 Opan Arifudin #18,342 worldwide 4.1k citations · 70 works
- 4 Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum #20,874 worldwide 95k citations · 117 works
- 5 David Gaveau #22,682 worldwide 8.7k citations · 115 works
Montenegro
- 1 Nebojša Bulatović #261,816 worldwide 17k citations · 42 works
- 2 T. Ravdandorj #265,252 worldwide 5k citations · 92 works
- 3 K. B. Cantun Avila #321,930 worldwide 4.7k citations · 86 works
- 4 Aneta Bošković #366,061 worldwide 32k citations · 41 works
- 5 B. Tseepeldorj #384,755 worldwide 4k citations · 68 works