Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Compare · Countries

Philippines vs Rwanda

On research quality in 2022-now, The Philippines ranks #68 in the world and Rwanda #69, of 189 countries. The Philippines stands higher in 20 of the 22 fields both publish in, Rwanda in 2.

Research profiles alike: 0.69similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured

Compare other countries
vs

Philippines

World rank, 2022-now
#68
#60 all time
Works, 2022-now
56k
fractional
Top-10% rate
5.8%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
64%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Leadership and Management, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Research and Theory.

Rwanda

World rank, 2022-now
#69
#72 all time
Works, 2022-now
4.6k
fractional
Top-10% rate
10.2%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
73%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Chemical Health and Safety, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Developmental Biology.

Who leads, measure by measure?

Rwanda leads on 6 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access, international co-authorship and growth. The Philippines leads on 2 of 9 measures: research quality and output. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.

Philippines 21 level6 Rwanda
  1. #68Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#69
  2. 0.49×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.99×
  3. 56kOutputfractional works, 2022-now4.6k
  4. 5.8%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited10.2%
  5. 7.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.2
  6. 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
  7. 64%Open accessof its works free to read, all time73%
  8. 20%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time57%
  9. +102%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+111%

A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.

Who leads in each field?

Philippines stands higher in 20 of 22 fields, Rwanda in 2. The Philippines leads most in Computer Science (#53 against #75); Rwanda leads most in Environmental Science (#56 against #77). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.

The numbers behind each field

Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.

Field Philippines rankRwanda rank Philippines top 10%Rwanda top 10% Philippines worksRwanda works
Agricultural and Biological Sciences #65 #68 4.7% 13.9% 3.8k 263
Arts and Humanities #54 - 7.9% - 1.9k -
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology #73 - 4.3% - 1.3k -
Business, Management and Accounting #70 #78 4.6% 5.4% 3.2k 221
Chemistry #57 - 3.9% - 344 -
Computer Science #53 #75 6.6% 9.3% 5.8k 301
Decision Sciences #54 - 4.7% - 934 -
Earth and Planetary Sciences #61 - 4.4% - 476 -
Economics, Econometrics and Finance #66 - 6.5% - 1.4k -
Energy #65 - 4.4% - 263 -
Engineering #73 #81 3.3% 8.8% 4.3k 331
Environmental Science #77 #56 4.0% 9.0% 3.2k 374
Health Professions #59 - 7.5% - 1.9k -
Immunology and Microbiology #57 - 4.7% - 287 -
Materials Science #67 - 4.4% - 523 -
Mathematics #62 - 8.4% - 619 -
Medicine #74 #56 4.8% 10.4% 5.9k 890
Neuroscience #45 - 4.5% - 361 -
Nursing #50 - 3.2% - 367 -
Physics and Astronomy #65 - 6.7% - 279 -
Psychology #57 - 4.2% - 3.7k -
Social Sciences #53 #70 7.7% 11.6% 15k 799

What is each known for?

The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.

Philippines

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Educational Technology4,628▲ 5.5×47 topics
  2. E-Learning3,697▲ 5.4×27 topics
  3. Technology Integration3,446▲ 15×12 topics
  4. Education3,106▲ 2.5×152 topics
  5. Machine Learning3,005▲ 1.26×96 topics
  6. Online Learning2,867▲ 4.8×27 topics
  7. Globalization2,845▲ 2.0×172 topics
  8. Sustainability2,665▲ 1.52×135 topics
  9. Mental Health1,973▲ 1.93×48 topics
  10. Mobile Learning1,780▲ 7.3×6 topics
  11. Sustainable Development1,666▲ 1.49×110 topics
  12. Artificial Intelligence1,622▲ 1.59×66 topics
  13. Student Satisfaction1,621▲ 12×4 topics
  14. Teacher Professional Development1,551▲ 13×5 topics
  15. Inclusive Education1,550▲ 6.0×20 topics
  16. Student Engagement1,547▲ 5.4×17 topics
  17. Digital Transformation1,537▲ 4.0×32 topics
  18. Professional Development1,514▲ 10×15 topics
  19. Online Education1,393▲ 10×7 topics
  20. Higher Education1,319▲ 3.5×34 topics
  21. Teacher Perception1,245▲ 16×2 topics
  22. Google Classroom1,242▲ 17×1 topic
  23. Virtual Classroom1,242▲ 17×1 topic
  24. Distance Learning1,203▲ 4.8×14 topics
  25. Health Education1,148▲ 3.7×11 topics
  26. Teaching Strategies1,146▲ 5.7×7 topics
  27. Social Capital1,136▲ 3.1×21 topics
  28. Leadership1,135▲ 3.2×41 topics
  29. Motivation1,133▲ 3.8×12 topics
  30. Biogeography1,123▲ 5.6×20 topics
  31. STEM Education1,082▲ 3.3×16 topics
  32. Lifelong Learning1,067▲ 7.2×11 topics
  33. Job Satisfaction1,053▲ 3.3×15 topics
  34. 21st Century Skills1,012▲ 4.9×6 topics
  35. Self-Efficacy888▲ 4.8×11 topics
  36. Microlearning810▲ 50×1 topic
  37. Phylogeny798▲ 6.7×17 topics
  38. Academic Achievement778▲ 6.3×10 topics
  39. Taxonomy766▲ 7.4×15 topics
  40. Educational Leadership723▲ 8.0×4 topics

Rwanda

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change299▲ 1.99×104 topics
  2. Epidemiology291▲ 1.32×127 topics
  3. Machine Learning221▲ 1.20×84 topics
  4. Sustainability200▲ 1.48×92 topics
  5. Deep Learning169◆ 0.88×79 topics
  6. Education164▲ 1.73×70 topics
  7. Environmental Impact144▲ 1.53×58 topics
  8. Public Health141▲ 1.75×56 topics
  9. Educational Technology133▲ 2.0×30 topics
  10. Globalization129▲ 1.19×75 topics
  11. Remote Sensing123▲ 1.82×40 topics
  12. Supply Chain Management122▲ 2.5×21 topics
  13. Genocide120▲ 41×3 topics
  14. Politics114▲ 7.9×12 topics
  15. Maternal Mortality108▲ 8.7×5 topics
  16. Risk Factors106▲ 1.74×35 topics
  17. Media105▲ 13×5 topics
  18. Middle East105▲ 31×2 topics
  19. Qatar104▲ 104×1 topic
  20. Rwanda104▲ 104×1 topic
  21. Community Health Workers100▲ 20×2 topics
  22. Risk Management94▲ 3.6×14 topics
  23. Health Inequalities92▲ 14×5 topics
  24. Socio-economic Factors89▲ 14×3 topics
  25. Child Mortality89▲ 22×1 topic
  26. Health Systems89▲ 22×1 topic
  27. Teaching Strategies84▲ 5.4×5 topics
  28. Higher Education82▲ 2.8×22 topics
  29. Child Development82▲ 3.6×8 topics
  30. Ethical Considerations75▲ 3.9×15 topics
  31. Global Burden of Disease75▲ 5.5×4 topics
  32. Student Engagement74▲ 3.4×16 topics
  33. Medical Education71▲ 4.8×11 topics
  34. Technology Integration70▲ 4.0×10 topics
  35. Vaccine69▲ 3.1×11 topics
  36. Global Health68▲ 7.9×7 topics
  37. Maternal and Child Undernutrition63▲ 14×1 topic
  38. Water Sanitation Hygiene63▲ 14×1 topic
  39. Poverty Reduction60▲ 8.4×5 topics
  40. Surgical Care46▲ 15×2 topics

Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.

How has their output grown?

The Philippines has out-published Rwanda every year since 1980.

still counting10k20kPhilippines18k in 2025Rwanda1,664 in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works per year.

Their share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.

still counting0.20%0.40%Philippines0.31% in 2025Rwanda0.028% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).

still counting10%20%Rwanda11.2% in 2025Philippines5.6% in 2025200020102020

A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.

Who holds more of the world's best institutions?

A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.

Philippines 23 level0 Rwanda
  1. 0In the world top 500
  2. 0In the top 1000
  3. 0In the top 5000
  4. 1In the top 1,0000
  5. #48Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51

Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.

Which publishes more research, Philippines or Rwanda?

The Philippines publishes 12.2× as much research as Rwanda in 2022-now (56k against 4.6k fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Philippines or Rwanda?

10.2% of Rwanda's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 5.8% for the Philippines.

Is Philippines or Rwanda growing faster?

Output in 2022-25 was +111% against 2018-21 for Rwanda, and +102% for the Philippines.

Which has more open access research, Philippines or Rwanda?

73% of Rwanda's research is free to read, against 64% of the Philippines's.

Which has more world-class institutions, Philippines or Rwanda?

The Philippines holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Rwanda 0; in the top 1,000 it is 1 against 0.

Which institutions lead in each country?

The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.

Philippines

  1. 1Northwestern University11.9% top 10% · 850 works
  2. 2De La Salle University6.5% top 10% · 2.6k works
  3. 3Cebu Technological University7.8% top 10% · 927 works
  4. 4Bulacan State University4.7% top 10% · 693 works
  5. 5Caraga State University4.7% top 10% · 721 works
  6. 6University of Mindanao6.9% top 10% · 1.1k works

Rwanda

  1. 1University of Rwanda11.0% top 10% · 1.6k works
  2. 2University of Kigali6.7% top 10% · 612 works
  3. 3Ministry of Natural Resources12.5% top 10% · 458 works
  4. 4Rwanda Biomedical Center13.9% top 10% · 207 works
  5. 5University of Global Health Equity13.5% top 10% · 218 works
  6. 6Ministry of Education12.9% top 10% · 231 works

The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.

Who are the top researchers on each side?

The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.

Philippines

  1. 1 Veincent Christian Filipino Pepito #10,461 worldwide 72k citations · 102 works
  2. 2 Jason Villota Chavez #12,774 worldwide 1.5k citations · 67 works
  3. 3 Liane Peña Alampay #24,239 worldwide 7.2k citations · 141 works
  4. 4 Reggie C. Pantig #27,163 worldwide 2.2k citations · 119 works
  5. 5 Nese Sreenivasulu #33,746 worldwide 13k citations · 242 works

Rwanda

  1. 1 Corine Karema #100,026 worldwide 84k citations · 83 works
  2. 2 Claude Mambo Muvunyi #103,506 worldwide 4.7k citations · 224 works
  3. 3 Agnès Binagwaho #112,520 worldwide 24k citations · 297 works
  4. 4 Ainhoa Costas‐Chavarri #144,195 worldwide 4.1k citations · 51 works
  5. 5 Pierre Gashema #164,832 worldwide 531 citations · 71 works