Charles River Laboratories (United States)
In research, Charles River Laboratories (United States) stands highest in Life Sciences (#4,876 of 6,403 worldwide), Medicine (#6,564 of 8,541 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#7,611 of 9,902 worldwide), 2022-now.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #15,561 of 22,385 · #17,432 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,230 of 3,332
- Research works
- 691 ▲ 36% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 11k 15.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.0% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.89× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 37% world 40%
- International
- 21% world 18%
What is Charles River Laboratories (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life SciencesDomain | #4,876 of 6,403 | 4.9% | 80 | #5637 | |
| MedicineField | #6,564 of 8,541 | 5.2% | 68 | #7719 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #7,611 of 9,902 | 5.6% | 85 | #8915 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Charles River Laboratories (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Life Sciences#5,637 #4,876
- Medicine#7,719 #6,564
- Health Sciences#8,915 #7,611
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does Charles River Laboratories (United States) work in?
In 2022-now, 43% of research at Charles River Laboratories (United States) is in Health Sciences, 41% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (34%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (23%), Immunology and Microbiology (9%). It does 2.9× the world's share of Life Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 25 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences9043.1%
- Medicine7234.2%
- Veterinary157.1%
- Health Professions20.8%
- Nursing20.8%
- Dentistry00.1%
- Life Sciences8540.5%
- Physical Sciences3014.2%
- Engineering94.5%
- Environmental Science94.4%
- Computer Science52.5%
- Chemistry21.1%
- Materials Science10.7%
- Mathematics10.4%
- Energy10.3%
- Chemical Engineering00.2%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Social Sciences52.2%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 52.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 25 fields, with their numbers
- Veterinary52.54×15 works
- Immunology and Microbiology9.06×19 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology4.31×48 works
- Neuroscience2.36×8 works
- Medicine1.78×72 works
- Nursing1.65×2 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.64×1 works
- Environmental Science0.88×9 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.84×8 works
- Chemistry0.73×2 works
- Chemical Engineering0.57×0 works
- Mathematics0.35×1 works
- Computer Science0.32×5 works
- Health Professions0.32×2 works
- Psychology0.31×2 works
- Engineering0.30×9 works
- Energy0.27×0 works
- Decision Sciences0.23×0 works
- Materials Science0.20×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.15×1 works
- Dentistry0.11×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.10×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.05×0 works
- Social Sciences0.03×1 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.02×0 works
- Veterinary 52.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 9.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4.3×
- Neuroscience 2.4×
- Medicine 1.8×
- Nursing 1.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.6×
- Environmental Science 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.8×
- Chemistry 0.7×
- Chemical Engineering 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Health Professions 0.3×
- Psychology 0.3×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Energy 0.3×
- Decision Sciences 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Charles River Laboratories (United States)?
Ranked on the quality score, Cheryl L. Perkins, Kathleen R. Pritchett‐Corning and Danielle L. Brown lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Charles River Laboratories (United States).
- 1
Cheryl L. Perkins
United States · #697,606 worldwide 6.2k citations · 24 works
- 2
Kathleen R. Pritchett‐Corning
United States · #1,001,921 worldwide 2.9k citations · 85 works
- 3
Danielle L. Brown
United States · #1,263,647 worldwide 1.7k citations · 38 works
- 4
Lauren E. Black
United States · #1,617,634 worldwide 1.4k citations · 19 works
- 5
Julie Schwartz
United States · #1,845,898 worldwide 2.9k citations · 86 works
- 6
James Kramer
United States · #1,892,478 worldwide 1.5k citations · 45 works
- 7
George Treacy
United States · #1,964,308 worldwide 1.2k citations · 28 works
- 8
Ryan F. Boyd
United States · #2,101,347 worldwide 527 citations · 24 works
- 9
Leon F. Stankowski
United States · #2,445,788 worldwide 2.2k citations · 54 works
- 10
Amanda L. Hays
United States · #2,594,588 worldwide 707 citations · 44 works
Which keywords describe research at Charles River Laboratories (United States)?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Immunotherapy, Gene Therapy, Ethical Considerations, Publication Bias, Animal Research Reporting, ARRIVE Guidelines, Immune System and Neurotoxicity.
- Environmental Exposure
- Targeted Therapy
- Data Analysis
- AAV
- Genomic Integration
- Dendritic Cells
- Genomic Instability
- Bacterial Therapy
- Pharmacokinetics
- Innate Immunity
- Animal Welfare
- Histopathology
- Gene Expression
- Cancer Immunotherapy
- Tumor Regression
- Immune System
- Animal Research Reporting
- Inflammation
- Oxidative Stress
- Immunotherapy
- Epidemiology
- Gene Therapy
- Ethical Considerations
- ARRIVE Guidelines
- Publication Bias
- Neurotoxicity
- Immunity
- Toxicology
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Immunotoxicity
- Tumor Targeting
- Health Effects
- Arginine Deprivation
- Environmental Monitoring
- Antigen Presentation
- Tumor Antigen
- Anesthesia
- Viral Vectors
- Metabolic Disorders
- Fibrosis
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology15▲ 1.78×49 topics
- Immunotherapy13▲ 8.4×14 topics
- Gene Therapy10▲ 26×6 topics
- Oxidative Stress9▲ 2.6×24 topics
- Ethical Considerations9▲ 12×7 topics
- Inflammation8▲ 1.89×35 topics
- ARRIVE Guidelines8▲ 333×1 topic
- Animal Research Reporting8▲ 333×1 topic
- Publication Bias8▲ 84×2 topics
- Immune System8▲ 15×3 topics
- Neurotoxicity7▲ 29×4 topics
- Tumor Regression7▲ 29×2 topics
- Immunity7▲ 7.9×7 topics
- Cancer Immunotherapy6▲ 20×2 topics
- Toxicology6▲ 18×4 topics
- Gene Expression6▲ 4.8×10 topics
- Tumor Microenvironment6▲ 6.7×6 topics
- Histopathology6▲ 139×1 topic
- Immunotoxicity6▲ 492×1 topic
- Animal Welfare5▲ 29×4 topics
- Tumor Targeting5▲ 14×3 topics
- Innate Immunity5▲ 7.7×8 topics
- Health Effects5▲ 3.9×10 topics
- Pharmacokinetics5▲ 8.5×4 topics
- Arginine Deprivation4▲ 55×1 topic
- Bacterial Therapy4▲ 55×1 topic
- Environmental Monitoring4▲ 5.6×3 topics
- Genomic Instability4▲ 19×3 topics
- Antigen Presentation4▲ 22×2 topics
- Dendritic Cells4▲ 22×1 topic
- Tumor Antigen4▲ 32×1 topic
- Genomic Integration4▲ 34×2 topics
- Anesthesia4▲ 24×3 topics
- AAV4▲ 44×1 topic
- Viral Vectors4▲ 44×1 topic
- Data Analysis4▲ 6.4×3 topics
- Metabolic Disorders3▲ 13×3 topics
- Targeted Therapy3▲ 7.2×4 topics
- Fibrosis3▲ 7.8×4 topics
- Environmental Exposure3▲ 14×2 topics
Which research topics does Charles River Laboratories (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Animal testing and alternatives, Immunotoxicology and immune responses, Cancer Research and Treatments and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Animal testing and alternatives Small Animals 8 works
- 2 Immunotoxicology and immune responses Immunology 6 works
- 3 Cancer Research and Treatments Biotechnology 4 works
- 4 Immunotherapy and Immune Responses Immunology 4 works
- 5 Virus-based gene therapy research Genetics 4 works
- 6 Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications Molecular Biology 3 works
- 7 Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 3 works
- 8 Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment Cancer Research 3 works
- 9 Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia Small Animals 3 works
- 10 Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism Cancer Research 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Charles River Laboratories (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 36% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Charles River Laboratories (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00072% in 2024.
Fractional works of Charles River Laboratories (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 11.7% in 2018.
Other research institutions in Wilmington
- OSRAM (United States)
- Nova Medical (United States)
- Implant Sciences (United States)
- Sun Pharma (United States)
- TeraDiode (United States)
- Tecomet (United States)
- PVD Products (United States)
- CuriRx (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Charles River Laboratories (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
