Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Toronto · Canada

Structural Genomics Consortium

In research, Structural Genomics Consortium stands highest in Life Sciences (#1,088 of 11,023 worldwide), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (#731 of 5,801 worldwide) and Molecular Biology (#536 of 3,729 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (Molecular Biology is 12.2× its share of world research).

World rank, all time
#4,094
of 34,923
Rank in Canada
#99
of 718
Research works
290
▲ 42% vs 2018-21
Citations
17k
59.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
17.7%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.29×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
70%
world 40%
International
62%
world 18%

What is Structural Genomics Consortium known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Life SciencesDomain #1,088 of 11,023 18.6%190
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField #731 of 5,801 18.3%169
Molecular BiologySubfield #536 of 3,729 18.3%145

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Structural Genomics Consortium sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Structural Genomics Consortium work in?

In 2022-now, 49% of research at Structural Genomics Consortium is in Life Sciences, 26% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (43%), Medicine (22%), Engineering (7%). It does 3.1× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 36 fractional works · 49.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 31 fractional works · 42.8% of its workMolecular Biology: 27 fractional works · 36.9% of its workCell Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiophysics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCancer Research: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMolecular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStructural Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 19 fractional works · 26.1% of its workEngineering: 5 fractional works · 7.3% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 3.8% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workChemistry: 4 fractional works · 5.9% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 3 fractional works · 4.1% of its workSpectroscopy: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workInorganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 3 fractional works · 4.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 3.8% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 2 fractional works · 3.1% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workProcess Chemistry and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 16 fractional works · 21.7% of its workMedicine: 16 fractional works · 21.6% of its workOncology: 4 fractional works · 4.8% of its workInfectious Diseases: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKStructuralGenomics…73fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences49%Physical Sciences26%Health Sciences22%Social Sciences3%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology3142.8%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology22.1%
    3. Neuroscience11.6%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics11.6%
    5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.1%
    1. Engineering57.3%
    2. Chemistry45.9%
    3. Materials Science34.6%
    4. Computer Science33.8%
    5. Physics and Astronomy11.5%
    6. Environmental Science11.4%
    7. Energy10.8%
    8. Chemical Engineering00.4%
    9. Mathematics00.2%
    10. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.2%
    1. Medicine1621.6%
    2. Health Professions00.2%
    3. Veterinary00.0%
    1. Decision Sciences11.0%
    2. Social Sciences11.0%
    3. Arts and Humanities10.8%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.2%
    5. Psychology00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Structural Genomics Consortium specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Molecular Biology takes 12.2× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Molecular BiologySubfield · 27.0 works12×
  2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField · 31.3 works8.0×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.22× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 8.02× its world share, 31 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.11× its world share, 2 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.00× its world share, 1 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 4.43× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemical Engineering: 1.20× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 3.74× its world share, 4 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.49× its world share, 3 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.90× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.49× its world share, 5 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.29× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.33× its world share, 3 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.66× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.12× its world share, 16 worksMedicineVeterinary: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.26× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 1.02× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.08× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 8.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 23 fields, with their numbers
  1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology8.02×31 works
  2. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics4.43×1 works
  3. Chemistry3.74×4 works
  4. Immunology and Microbiology2.11×2 works
  5. Materials Science1.33×3 works
  6. Chemical Engineering1.20×0 works
  7. Medicine1.12×16 works
  8. Decision Sciences1.02×1 works
  9. Neuroscience1.00×1 works
  10. Energy0.90×1 works
  11. Physics and Astronomy0.66×1 works
  12. Computer Science0.49×3 works
  13. Engineering0.49×5 works
  14. Environmental Science0.29×1 works
  15. Arts and Humanities0.26×1 works
  16. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.22×1 works
  17. Veterinary0.22×0 works
  18. Mathematics0.14×0 works
  19. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.10×0 works
  20. Social Sciences0.08×1 works
  21. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.07×0 works
  22. Health Professions0.06×0 works
  23. Psychology0.05×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Structural Genomics Consortium?

Ranked on the quality score, Panagiotis Prinos, Abdellah Allali‐Hassani and Raymond Hui lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Structural Genomics Consortium.

  1. 1 Panagiotis Prinos Canada · #163,549 worldwide 3.9k citations · 111 works
  2. 2 Abdellah Allali‐Hassani Canada · #174,280 worldwide 7.5k citations · 113 works
  3. 3 Raymond Hui Canada · #490,827 worldwide 4.4k citations · 84 works
  4. 4 Amy K. Wernimont Canada · #643,902 worldwide 3.1k citations · 36 works
  5. 5 Raquel A. C. Machado Canada · #759,724 worldwide 1k citations · 44 works
  6. 6 Chuanbing Bian Canada · #818,889 worldwide 2.2k citations · 28 works
  7. 7 Yufeng Tong Canada · #1,005,988 worldwide 3k citations · 97 works
  8. 8 Tara L. Davis Canada · #2,235,860 worldwide 969 citations · 32 works
  9. 9 Rebeka Cataldo de Oliveira Fanti Canada · #2,616,799 worldwide 64 citations · 16 works
  10. 10 Viacheslav V. Trush Canada · #4,182,232 worldwide 251 citations · 20 works
All ranked researchers at Structural Genomics Consortium

What are the most cited papers from Structural Genomics Consortium?

The most cited paper from Structural Genomics Consortium is "The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability" (F. Niesen, Helena Berglund, Masoud Vedadi, 2007), with 2,481 citations. Next come "Histone Recognition and Large-Scale Structural Analysis of the Human Bromodomain Family" (1,794) and "Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery" (1,324).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability F. Niesen, Helena Berglund, Masoud Vedadi · Nature Protocols Sep 2007 2,481
2 Histone Recognition and Large-Scale Structural Analysis of the Human Bromodomain Family P. Filippakopoulos, S. Picaud, Maria Mangos et al. · Cell Open access Mar 2012 1,794
3 Epigenetic protein families: a new frontier for drug discovery C.H. Arrowsmith, C. Bountra, Paul V. Fish et al. · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Review 13 Apr 2012 1,324
4 Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox Matthieu Schapira, Matthew F. Calabrese, Alex N. Bullock et al. · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Review 30 Oct 2019 983
5 Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data Yang Shen, Oliver F. Lange, Frank Delaglio et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access 7 Mar 2008 869
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Structural Genomics Consortium?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cancer Therapy, Transcriptional Regulation, Cancer, BET Bromodomains, PROTACs, Epigenetic Regulation, Proteasome Inhibitors and Proteasome.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Cancer Therapy8▲ 19×14 topics
  2. Transcriptional Regulation7▲ 60×5 topics
  3. Cancer6▲ 5.8×24 topics
  4. Machine Learning5▲ 2.1×12 topics
  5. BET Bromodomains4▲ 179×1 topic
  6. PROTACs4▲ 179×1 topic
  7. Epigenetic Regulation4▲ 23×4 topics
  8. Proteasome Inhibitors3▲ 64×2 topics
  9. Proteasome3▲ 119×1 topic
  10. Ubiquitin3▲ 119×1 topic
  11. Cell Proliferation3▲ 45×3 topics
  12. Medicinal Chemistry3▲ 15×6 topics
  13. Drug Discovery3▲ 16×6 topics
  14. Arginine Methylation2▲ 133×1 topic
  15. Pharmacokinetics2▲ 13×2 topics
  16. Protein Arginine Methyltransferases2▲ 133×1 topic
  17. Tumor Microenvironment2▲ 7.2×5 topics
  18. Angiogenesis2▲ 9.5×6 topics
  19. DNA Methylation2▲ 28×3 topics
  20. Epigenetic Reprogramming2▲ 33×1 topic
  21. Histone Modification2▲ 45×1 topic
  22. Molecular Docking2▲ 25×1 topic
  23. Virtual Screening2▲ 34×1 topic
  24. Cancer Progression2▲ 17×5 topics
  25. Gene Expression2▲ 4.6×10 topics
  26. Molecular Dynamics2▲ 17×3 topics
  27. PET Imaging2▲ 17×3 topics
  28. Stromal Cells2▲ 35×2 topics
  29. Fibroblast Activation Protein2▲ 60×1 topic
  30. Immunosuppression2▲ 29×1 topic
  31. Mitochondrial Dysfunction2▲ 8.7×5 topics
  32. Apoptosis2▲ 7.9×7 topics
  33. High-Throughput2▲ 36×1 topic
  34. Immunity2▲ 5.4×5 topics
  35. Materials Informatics2▲ 36×1 topic
  36. RNA methylation2▲ 26×1 topic
  37. m6A-seq2▲ 26×1 topic
  38. Mutation2▲ 11×3 topics
  39. Parkinson's Disease2▲ 8.5×5 topics
  40. Microfluidics1▲ 25×2 topics

Which research topics does Structural Genomics Consortium publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, Cancer-related gene regulation and Computational Drug Discovery Methods.

  1. 1 Protein Degradation and Inhibitors Molecular Biology 4 works
  2. 2 Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways Molecular Biology 3 works
  3. 3 Cancer-related gene regulation Molecular Biology 2 works
  4. 4 Computational Drug Discovery Methods Computational Theory and Mathematics 2 works
  5. 5 Epigenetics and DNA Methylation Molecular Biology 2 works
  6. 6 Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis Oncology 2 works
  7. 7 RNA modifications and cancer Molecular Biology 2 works
  8. 8 Machine Learning in Materials Science Materials Chemistry 2 works
  9. 9 Click Chemistry and Applications Organic Chemistry 1 works
  10. 10 Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation Biomedical Engineering 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available70.5%not open29.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors62.4%domestic only37.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Structural Genomics Consortium's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 42% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Structural Genomics Consortium as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00030% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Structural Genomics Consortium0.00032% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Structural Genomics Consortium over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Toronto

All research institutions in Toronto

Share Structural Genomics Consortium's ranking

Structural Genomics Consortium on Science Explorer

A card with Structural Genomics Consortium's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website2Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Its overall standing, then the domains, fields and subfields where Structural Genomics Consortium is in the world's top ten or its top 1%. Each has an image of its own.

Overall

Domains

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Structural Genomics Consortium. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.