Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 44k research works in it since 1950. 9.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Proteolytic Pathway, exploring mechanisms of protein degradation, regulation of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases, roles of Deubiquitinating Enzymes, and the impact of SUMOylation. It also delves into the development of proteasome inhibitors for cancer therapy and the involvement of this pathway in NF-?B activation.
- Ubiquitin
- Proteasome
- Deubiquitinating Enzymes
- E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
- SUMOylation
- Protein Degradation
- Polyubiquitin Chains
- Proteasome Inhibitors
- NF-?B Activation
- Cancer Therapy
- Research works
- 44k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 4.4k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 9.9% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +13% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
China
44% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways research?
By volume, China and the United States publish the most (3.2k and 2k works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
China 3.2k works
- 2
United States 2k works
- 3
Germany 341 works
- 4
Japan 297 works
- 5
United Kingdom 289 works
- 6
India 273 works
- 7
South Korea 197 works
- 8
Canada 190 works
- 9
France 177 works
- 10
Italy 177 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways research?
By volume in 2022-now, Harvard University publishes the most Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways research, followed by Chinese Academy of Sciences and Zhejiang University.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Harvard University
United States 115 works
- 2
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China 102 works
- 3
Zhejiang University
China 85 works
- 4
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
China 84 works
- 5
Sun Yat-sen University
China 78 works
- 6
National Institutes of Health
United States 65 works
- 7
Central South University
China 62 works
- 8
Nanjing Medical University
China 62 works
- 9
Sichuan University
China 54 works
- 10
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 54 works
Who are the leading researchers in Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways include Eric S. Lander, Mark J. Daly and Stacey L. Gabriel.
- 1
Eric S. Lander
United States 524k citations
- 2
Mark J. Daly
United States 403k citations
- 3
Stacey L. Gabriel
United States 402k citations
- 4
Peer Bork
Germany 396k citations
- 5
Guido Kroemer
France 386k citations
- 6
Bert Vogelstein
United States 373k citations
- 7
Gad A. Getz
United States 364k citations
- 8
Elaine R. Mardis
United States 346k citations
- 9
Shizuo Akira
Japan 342k citations
- 10
Jun Wang
China 340k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways research done?
The largest centres of Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Guangzhou (China) and Hangzhou (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Dundee and Nantong.
Largest cities, 2022-now
Where it is the local speciality
- DundeeGB · 28.1 works15×
- NantongCN · 30.9 works8.1×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways?
Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, China Pharmaceutical University and University of Dundee score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, country by countryIs Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 13% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.036% in 2024.
Fractional works of Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways. Posts are plain text and can be reported.