Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Topic · Education

Educational Methods and Analysis

Educational Methods and Analysis is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 11k research works in it since 1953. 9.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on trends in educational research related to 21st century skills, including content analysis, curriculum evaluation, teacher training, and bibliometric analysis. It also covers topics such as reading habits, language teaching, and skill measurement.

  • 21st Century Skills
  • Content Analysis
  • Educational Research
  • Curriculum Evaluation
  • Teacher Training
  • Bibliometric Analysis
  • Reading Habits
  • Language Teaching
  • Skill Measurement
  • Meta-Analysis
Research works
11k
fractional, since 1953
In the world top 10%
1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+31%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
Türkiye
89% of the 10 largest, 2022-now

Which countries lead Educational Methods and Analysis research?

By volume, Türkiye and the United States publish the most (4k and 115 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 Türkiye 4k works
  2. 2 United States 115 works
  3. 3 ?? 105 works
  4. 4 Iraq 67 works
  5. 5 Azerbaijan 66 works
  6. 6 Kazakhstan 51 works
  7. 7 Indonesia 28 works
  8. 8 China 17 works
  9. 9 Cyprus 16 works
  10. 10 Iran 13 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Türkiye: 89.2%United States: 2.6%??: 2.4%Iraq: 1.5%6 others listed: 4.3%89%largest
Türkiye3,965 · 89.2%United States115 · 2.6%??105 · 2.4%Iraq67 · 1.5%6 others listed192 · 4.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Educational Methods and Analysis research?

By volume in 2022-now, Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği publishes the most Educational Methods and Analysis research, followed by Gazi University and Hacettepe University.

Who are the leading researchers in Educational Methods and Analysis?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Educational Methods and Analysis include H. Duran Yıldız.

  1. 1 H. Duran Yıldız France 117k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Educational Methods and Analysis?

The most cited paper in Educational Methods and Analysis is "Nitel Araştırma Süreci: Nitel Bir Araştırma Nasıl Yapılır?" (Ali BALTACI, 2019), with 974 citations. Next come "Who Chooses Teaching and Why? Profiling Characteristics and Motivations Across Three Australian Universities" (695) and "Bilingualism: Language and Cognition" (568).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Nitel Araştırma Süreci: Nitel Bir Araştırma Nasıl Yapılır? Ali BALTACI · Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Open access 24 Dec 2019 974
2 Who Chooses Teaching and Why? Profiling Characteristics and Motivations Across Three Australian Universities Paul Richardson, Helen M. G. Watt · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 14 Feb 2006 695
3 Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Farzaneh MAHOMOUDİ, Amirreza MAHMOUDİ · Turkish Journal of Educational Research Open access 30 Dec 2020 568
4 Bir araştırma yöntemi olarak doküman analizi Ramazan Sak, İkbal Tuba Şahin-Sak, Çağla Öneren Şendil et al. · Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi Open access 19 May 2021 545
5 The Relationship Between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Reading Comprehension Instruction Virginia Richardson, Patricia L. Anders, Deborah L. Tidwell et al. · American Educational Research Journal Sep 1991 502
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Educational Methods and Analysis research done?

The largest centres of Educational Methods and Analysis research in 2022-now are Ankara (Türkiye), Istanbul (Türkiye), Konya (Türkiye) and Izmir (Türkiye). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Wellfleet, Trabzon and Bayburt.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 AnkaraTürkiye 798 works
  2. 2 IstanbulTürkiye 430 works
  3. 3 KonyaTürkiye 117 works
  4. 4 IzmirTürkiye 107 works
  5. 5 EskişehirTürkiye 90 works
  6. 6 SamsunTürkiye 82 works
  7. 7 ErzurumTürkiye 76 works
  8. 8 SivasTürkiye 76 works
  9. 9 ÇanakkaleTürkiye 68 works
  10. 10 BursaTürkiye 67 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. WellfleetUS · 32.2 works408×
  2. Trabzon40.5 works212×
  3. BayburtTR · 48.5 works162×
  4. AmasyaTR · 38.9 works95×
  5. KırşehirTR · 43.4 works87×
  6. MuşTR · 30.5 works86×
  7. NevşehirTR · 31.7 works84×
  8. AğrıTR · 21.7 works84×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Educational Methods and Analysis than the world average.

See Educational Methods and Analysis on the map

Where is the best place to study Educational Methods and Analysis?

Among universities, judged by research, Gazi University, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi and Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 14.07%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Alanya Alaaddin Keyk…Aksaray UniversitySivas Cumhuriyet Üni…Gazi University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Gazi UniversityTürkiye 70.29.1%101.4×184 +40.1%
2Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi 69.221.2%116.2×19 +47.2%
3Sivas Cumhuriyet ÜniversitesiTürkiye 66.512.1%77.0×76 +143.4%
4Aksaray UniversityTürkiye 65.914.1%93.9×45 +75.2%
5Yıldız Technical UniversityTürkiye 65.711.4%54.7×55 +23.8%
6Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit UniversityTürkiye 65.015.6%65.9×33 +74.0%
7Van Yüzüncü Yıl ÜniversitesiTürkiye 64.613.3%59.3×50 +33.4%
8Fırat UniversityTürkiye 64.412.8%63.0×55 +41.2%
9Düzce ÜniversitesiTürkiye 63.815.7%51.6×32 +32.8%
10Muş Alparslan UniversityTürkiye 63.715.4%97.4×30 +23.6%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Educational Methods and Analysis, country by country

Is Educational Methods and Analysis research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 31% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2023. The fastest-growing topics are Educational Methods and Analysis.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Educational Methods and Analysis as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.016% in 2024.

still counting0.010%0.020%0.030%Educational Methods and Analysis0.014% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Educational Methods and Analysis over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Educational Methods and Analysis10.0% in 202520102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Educational Methods and Analysis. Posts are plain text and can be reported.