Bioactive natural compounds
Bioactive natural compounds is a research topic within Molecular Biology. Science Explorer counts 11k research works in it since 1950. 10.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the biological activities and potential pharmacological applications of prenylated flavonoids, with a focus on their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties. The research covers the isolation, structure-activity relationship, and enzyme inhibition of these natural products, as well as their traditional medicinal uses in various cultures.
- Prenylated Flavonoids
- Pharmacology
- Antioxidants
- Anti-inflammatory
- Anticancer
- Traditional Medicine
- Enzyme Inhibition
- Isolation
- Structure-Activity Relationship
- Natural Products
- Research works
- 11k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.0% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +17% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
China
47% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Bioactive natural compounds research?
By volume, China and India publish the most (807 and 368 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
China 807 works
- 2
India 368 works
- 3
Indonesia 108 works
- 4
South Korea 95 works
- 5
United States 89 works
- 6
Thailand 62 works
- 7
Japan 54 works
- 8
Türkiye 51 works
- 9
Brazil 45 works
- 10
Malaysia 42 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Bioactive natural compounds research?
By volume in 2022-now, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Bioactive natural compounds research, followed by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China 29 works
- 2
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
China 25 works
- 3
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
China 16 works
- 4
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
China 11 works
- 5
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
China 11 works
- 6
Russian Academy of Sciences
Russia 10 works
- 7
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
India 9 works
- 8
Shenyang Pharmaceutical University
China 9 works
- 9
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
China 9 works
- 10
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
China 8 works
Who are the leading researchers in Bioactive natural compounds?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Bioactive natural compounds include Jun Wang, Amirhossein Sahebkar and Peter John Barnes.
- 1
Jun Wang
China 340k citations
- 2
Amirhossein Sahebkar
Iran 258k citations
- 3
Peter John Barnes
United Kingdom 225k citations
- 4
David Julian McClements
United States 185k citations
- 5
Barry B. Halliwell
United Kingdom 179k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Bioactive natural compounds research done?
The largest centres of Bioactive natural compounds research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Guangzhou (China), Shanghai (China) and Nanjing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Kunming and Bangkok.
Largest cities, 2022-now
Where it is the local speciality
- KunmingCN · 30.5 works6.2×
- BangkokTH · 26.8 works4.9×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Bioactive natural compounds than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Bioactive natural compounds?
Among universities, judged by research, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and Shenyang Pharmaceutical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
67.6 | 37.6% | 20.8× | 11 | +47.0% |
| 2 | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College |
59.3 | 10.1% | 11.7× | 25 | +9.5% |
| 3 | Shenyang Pharmaceutical University |
31.0 | 16.9% | 33.7× | 9 | +12.5% |
| 4 | Nanjing Forestry University |
28.8 | 6.2% | 8.9× | 8 | +76.8% |
| 5 | Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine |
28.2 | 10.6% | 15.7× | 8 | +44.8% |
| 6 | Beijing University of Chinese Medicine |
25.5 | 8.1% | 22.0× | 11 | -14.9% |
| 7 | Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
25.2 | 11.1% | 28.8× | 9 | +1.6% |
| 8 | Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
18.3 | 7.9% | 15.1× | 8 | -9.9% |
| 9 | Airlangga University |
11.3 | 9.4% | 4.7× | 8 | -1.1% |
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Bioactive natural compounds, country by countryIs Bioactive natural compounds research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 17% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Bioactive natural compounds.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Bioactive natural compounds as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0081% in 2024.
Fractional works of Bioactive natural compounds over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Bioactive natural compounds. Posts are plain text and can be reported.