Indonesia vs Moldova
On research quality in 2022-now, Indonesia ranks #65 in the world and Moldova #159, of 189 countries. Indonesia stands higher in 26 of the 26 fields both publish in, Moldova in 0.
Research profiles alike: 0.76very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other countries
Indonesia
- World rank, 2022-now
- #65
- #66 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 1.6M
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 7.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 86%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Human Factors and Ergonomics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Demography.
Moldova
- World rank, 2022-now
- #159
- #170 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 7.3k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 2.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 79%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: General Energy, Anatomy, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Indonesia leads on 6 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate, open access and growth. Moldova leads on 2 of 9 measures: citations per work and international co-authorship. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.
- #65Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#159
- 0.48×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.33×
- 1.6MOutputfractional works, 2022-now7.3k
- 7.4%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited2.6%
- 2.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work4.2
- 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
- 86%Open accessof its works free to read, all time79%
- 4%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time24%
- +65%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+29%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Indonesia stands higher in 26 of 26 fields, Moldova in 0. Indonesia leads most in Social Sciences (#27 against #142). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #59Agricultural and Biological Sciences#112
- #53Arts and Humanities#96
- #96Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-
- #33Business, Management and Accounting#106
- #41Chemical Engineering-
- #60Chemistry-
- #64Computer Science#123
- #64Decision Sciences-
- #59Dentistry-
- #62Earth and Planetary Sciences-
- #59Economics, Econometrics and Finance#105
- #70Energy-
- #87Engineering#126
- #74Environmental Science#108
- #51Health Professions#98
- #69Immunology and Microbiology-
- #73Materials Science#84
- #67Mathematics-
- #129Medicine#142
- #67Neuroscience-
- #56Nursing-
- #40Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-
- #63Physics and Astronomy-
- #92Psychology#104
- #27Social Sciences#142
- #28Veterinary-
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Indonesia rank | Moldova rank | Indonesia top 10% | Moldova top 10% | Indonesia works | Moldova works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #59 | #112 | 6.7% | 3.3% | 125k | 423 |
| Arts and Humanities | #53 | #96 | 7.9% | 3.5% | 36k | 343 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #96 | - | 1.9% | - | 13k | - |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #33 | #106 | 7.6% | 1.6% | 182k | 350 |
| Chemical Engineering | #41 | - | 2.7% | - | 663 | - |
| Chemistry | #60 | - | 2.4% | - | 4.6k | - |
| Computer Science | #64 | #123 | 8.1% | 2.8% | 176k | 478 |
| Decision Sciences | #64 | - | 2.8% | - | 11k | - |
| Dentistry | #59 | - | 1.6% | - | 2.7k | - |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | #62 | - | 2.4% | - | 7.4k | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #59 | #105 | 7.0% | 1.6% | 40k | 405 |
| Energy | #70 | - | 2.6% | - | 3.4k | - |
| Engineering | #87 | #126 | 3.5% | 2.2% | 75k | 578 |
| Environmental Science | #74 | #108 | 6.3% | 3.0% | 55k | 345 |
| Health Professions | #51 | #98 | 7.9% | 2.7% | 68k | 257 |
| Immunology and Microbiology | #69 | - | 2.0% | - | 2.6k | - |
| Materials Science | #73 | #84 | 2.9% | 1.8% | 9k | 204 |
| Mathematics | #67 | - | 7.9% | - | 16k | - |
| Medicine | #129 | #142 | 5.2% | 2.2% | 95k | 1.2k |
| Neuroscience | #67 | - | 1.9% | - | 2.5k | - |
| Nursing | #56 | - | 2.0% | - | 5.6k | - |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics | #40 | - | 3.1% | - | 2.8k | - |
| Physics and Astronomy | #63 | - | 3.7% | - | 1.6k | - |
| Psychology | #92 | #104 | 5.0% | 1.8% | 31k | 303 |
| Social Sciences | #27 | #142 | 8.8% | 3.2% | 613k | 1.6k |
| Veterinary | #28 | - | 3.2% | - | 313 | - |
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Indonesia
- Breastfeeding
- Community Participation
- School Literacy Movement
- Information Literacy
- Learning Outcomes
- Health Education
- UMKM
- STEM Education
- SMEs
- Islamic Banking
- Corporate Governance
- Pandemic
- COVID-19
- Digital Learning
- Education
- E-commerce
- Indonesia
- Media Literacy
- Character Education
- Social Media
- Community Empowerment
- E-Learning
- Educational Technology
- Local Wisdom
- Curriculum Development
- Digital Literacy
- Financial Performance
- Sustainable Development
- Qualitative Research
- Online Learning
- Economic Impact
- Supply Chain Management
- Islamic Education
- Digital Marketing
- Mobile Learning
- Information Technology
- Pandemic Response
- Reading Interest
- Customer Satisfaction
- Public Health Policy
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Community Empowerment148k▲ 12×16 topics
- Social Media117k▲ 4.9×41 topics
- E-Learning112k▲ 6.7×27 topics
- Character Education108k▲ 13×6 topics
- Educational Technology107k▲ 5.2×48 topics
- Media Literacy106k▲ 12×6 topics
- Local Wisdom105k▲ 13×9 topics
- Indonesia97k▲ 13×5 topics
- Curriculum Development95k▲ 8.1×20 topics
- E-commerce94k▲ 9.6×11 topics
- Digital Literacy90k▲ 9.1×13 topics
- Education88k▲ 3.0×161 topics
- Financial Performance86k▲ 8.8×16 topics
- Digital Learning84k▲ 9.6×13 topics
- Sustainable Development84k▲ 3.1×113 topics
- COVID-1983k▲ 3.7×34 topics
- Qualitative Research83k▲ 5.6×45 topics
- Pandemic81k▲ 4.7×14 topics
- Online Learning80k▲ 5.6×27 topics
- Corporate Governance79k▲ 6.2×32 topics
- Economic Impact76k▲ 8.2×13 topics
- Islamic Banking71k▲ 11×3 topics
- Supply Chain Management65k▲ 4.2×27 topics
- SMEs64k▲ 11×5 topics
- Islamic Education64k▲ 11×4 topics
- STEM Education64k▲ 8.1×16 topics
- Digital Marketing63k▲ 9.4×6 topics
- UMKM62k▲ 13×1 topic
- Mobile Learning61k▲ 10×6 topics
- Health Education61k▲ 8.1×11 topics
- Information Technology53k▲ 6.4×32 topics
- Learning Outcomes52k▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Pandemic Response47k▲ 12×3 topics
- Information Literacy46k▲ 10×4 topics
- Reading Interest45k▲ 13×1 topic
- School Literacy Movement45k▲ 13×1 topic
- Customer Satisfaction45k▲ 8.1×10 topics
- Community Participation44k▲ 7.2×19 topics
- Public Health Policy42k▲ 9.3×4 topics
- Breastfeeding42k▲ 11×3 topics
Moldova
- European Legal Systems
- Constitutionalism
- Fitness Technology
- Motor Skills Development
- Financial Security
- Physical Education
- Judicial Review
- Global Governance
- Health Promotion
- Regional Development
- Environmental Management
- Higher Education
- E-Learning
- Mental Health
- Renewable Energy
- Educational Technology
- Sustainability
- Innovation
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Sustainable Development
- Education
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Economic Development
- Pedagogy
- Digital Transformation
- Teacher Training
- Leadership
- International Law
- Digital Economy
- European Union
- Legal Regulation
- Athletic Training
- Digitalization
- Economic Security
- Biomechanical Analysis
- Sports Science
- ECHR
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainable Development524▲ 3.9×87 topics
- Globalization458▲ 2.7×111 topics
- Education415▲ 2.8×116 topics
- Human Rights413▲ 4.7×69 topics
- Climate Change381▲ 1.64×108 topics
- Innovation361▲ 4.1×71 topics
- Epidemiology318◆ 0.93×126 topics
- Sustainability308▲ 1.47×100 topics
- Artificial Intelligence277▲ 2.3×55 topics
- Educational Technology249▲ 2.5×44 topics
- Economic Development237▲ 3.5×34 topics
- Renewable Energy220▲ 1.78×55 topics
- Pedagogy210▲ 4.9×26 topics
- Mental Health205▲ 1.68×40 topics
- Digital Transformation185▲ 4.0×28 topics
- E-Learning185▲ 2.2×24 topics
- Teacher Training171▲ 3.3×27 topics
- Higher Education159▲ 3.5×26 topics
- Leadership154▲ 3.7×31 topics
- Environmental Management153▲ 4.4×19 topics
- International Law139▲ 5.2×29 topics
- Regional Development135▲ 4.6×16 topics
- Digital Economy130▲ 7.6×19 topics
- Health Promotion126▲ 4.7×12 topics
- European Union125▲ 6.5×23 topics
- Global Governance119▲ 5.8×21 topics
- Legal Regulation116▲ 6.0×8 topics
- Judicial Review112▲ 15×6 topics
- Athletic Training110▲ 14×3 topics
- Physical Education109▲ 10×7 topics
- Digitalization108▲ 6.1×9 topics
- Financial Security105▲ 12×3 topics
- Economic Security102▲ 5.6×7 topics
- Motor Skills Development94▲ 12×2 topics
- Biomechanical Analysis93▲ 17×2 topics
- Fitness Technology92▲ 46×1 topic
- Sports Science92▲ 46×1 topic
- Constitutionalism91▲ 12×4 topics
- ECHR87▲ 29×1 topic
- European Legal Systems87▲ 29×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Indonesia has out-published Moldova every year since 1980.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Who holds more of the world's best institutions?
A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.
- 0In the world top 500
- 0In the top 1000
- 1In the top 5000
- 14In the top 1,0000
- #19Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51
Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.
Which publishes more research, Indonesia or Moldova?
Indonesia publishes 216.2× as much research as Moldova in 2022-now (1.6M against 7.3k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Indonesia or Moldova?
7.4% of Indonesia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 2.6% for Moldova.
Is Indonesia or Moldova growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +65% against 2018-21 for Indonesia, and +29% for Moldova.
Which has more open access research, Indonesia or Moldova?
86% of Indonesia's research is free to read, against 79% of Moldova's.
Which has more world-class institutions, Indonesia or Moldova?
Indonesia holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Moldova 0; in the top 1,000 it is 14 against 0.
Which institutions lead in each country?
The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.
Indonesia
- 1Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu8.9% top 10% · 29k works
- 2Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara8.2% top 10% · 21k works
- 3Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya7.0% top 10% · 5.7k works
- 4Universitas Patria Artha7.2% top 10% · 16k works
- 5Indonesia University of Education10.9% top 10% · 21k works
- 6State University of Padang8.1% top 10% · 22k works
Moldova
- 1Moldova State University1.6% top 10% · 1.5k works
- 2Technical University of Moldova3.1% top 10% · 928 works
- 3Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science5.5% top 10% · 320 works
- 4State University of Physical Education and Sport3.4% top 10% · 386 works
- 5Institute of Educational Sciences8.2% top 10% · 216 works
- 6Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova1.8% top 10% · 672 works
The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Indonesia
- 1 Dian Palupi Kusuma #10,218 worldwide 82k citations · 164 works
- 2 Sven Wunder #14,885 worldwide 26k citations · 307 works
- 3 Opan Arifudin #18,342 worldwide 4.1k citations · 70 works
- 4 Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum #20,874 worldwide 95k citations · 117 works
- 5 David Gaveau #22,682 worldwide 8.7k citations · 115 works
Moldova
- 1 Valeriu Crudu #140,526 worldwide 4.5k citations · 157 works
- 2 Denis L. Nika #196,481 worldwide 9.6k citations · 101 works
- 3 Dumitru Chesov #439,970 worldwide 1.8k citations · 83 works
- 4 Oleg I. Lupan #601,694 worldwide 14k citations · 252 works
- 5 Eleonora Vataman #611,941 worldwide 11k citations · 37 works